[-] buffalobuffalo 44 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I remember the vitriol of old reddit. I believe you are contributing to that more than helping.

Reddit was never pure in terms of discussion or kindness; I think you've got some heavily tinted rose glasses on. But reddit succeeded and brought you the deep, insightful discussion you crave because the enthusiasts were there. And enthusiasts are human, they are not all heartless cogs there to infodump and complain. The most knowledgeable, well-read, and well-spoken people I know are also ones to crack jokes and make their passions accessible and interesting.

If you want healthy discussion, I strongly believe you should allow at least a bit of levity and let people speak a little more freely. Chastising people for not being insightful enough will turn away plenty of the people you want to keep.

Let neckbeards and normies mingle. It's okay to have fun.

Also worth mentioning: this is Microblog Memes. It's in the name.

[-] buffalobuffalo 20 points 7 months ago

"your ignorance of the time cube is demonic"

I like that. I'm gonna start using that.

[-] buffalobuffalo 23 points 1 year ago

had

Plex lays off 20% of its workforce amid advertising slowdown

[-] buffalobuffalo 25 points 1 year ago

there's something in~~herently disturbing in~~ people ~~setting their pfp to a pre-teen then horny posting~~

[-] buffalobuffalo 55 points 1 year ago

Fascism always needs a Boogeyman

[-] buffalobuffalo 26 points 1 year ago

It's never too late to be a better person.

Also have a look at the name of the community. That kind of talk is not tolerated here.

[-] buffalobuffalo 41 points 1 year ago

If I believe the mod of the community in question is telling the truth, Seems like the incident in question was just a misunderstanding. The community name is

spoileradorableporn

I will refer to this as "the first community" in the following text.

The mod of the community copy/pasted the dictionary definition from vocabulary.com, which contains the word "childlike".

IMO, the community in question is not trying to skirt the line of Child Sexual Abuse Material (CSAM). In fact, there is a subreddit of the same name which has absolutely nothing to do with people that appear underage.

That said, the same mod also moderates, and posts to a different community with a concerning name. The spoiler below shows the name and the first three paragraphs of the sidebar as they appear:

spoilerCommunity is now open to posting. Posts not having verification info will be removed.

FauxBait is a place for sharing images and videos of the youngest-looking, legal-aged (18+) girls. If you like fresh, young starlets, this is the place for you!

Just to be clear: We only feature legal, consenting adults in accordance with U.S. Laws. All models featured were at least 18 years old at the time of filming.


Also, I'm not sure if the timestamps can be trusted, but said mod was instated as the only active mod of the first community at the same time that Ada made this post, which would mean that the mod account could not have been the one that wrote the original sidebar of the first community. Not sure what to make of that. For the sake of balance though, said mod does seem to be doing verifications of the age requirements. Also, the modlog for the first community shows two admin removals from at least 10 days before this debacle, both of which err on the side of caution, so at least the admins to seem to care about enforcing their rules.


The situation seems very muddy, but I personally don't think the original incident was that big of a deal (assuming the mod is telling the truth). However, I certainly don't blame the blahaj admins for defederating as it's certainly the safest option. Wouldn't want blahaj lemmy to get taken down :| Also happy to see less pron in my feed; I'm too lazy to block the individual /c/. Personal Instance-level blocking can't come soon enough.

[-] buffalobuffalo 49 points 1 year ago

"i am depressed

"You have depression."

"thank you doctor"

46
[-] buffalobuffalo 18 points 1 year ago

the instructions are clear. no mercy.

[-] buffalobuffalo 41 points 1 year ago

#NUANCE NEEDED.

Alec is making a point specifically about the 1000 hour maximum which was for INCANDESCENT lightbulbs. You know, the ones that aren't used anymore.

However, modern LED lightbulbs are typically over-driven and under-cooled. This drastically shortens their lifespan and worsens efficiency. But this might just be because it's harder to sell a $20 light that lasts for 20 years than it is to sell a $5 light that lasts for 5-10.

[-] buffalobuffalo 22 points 1 year ago

When you don't have a name for your variable: foo_fighter

88
experimentrule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago by buffalobuffalo to c/196
view more: next ›

buffalobuffalo

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF