Is "totally unexpected" the criteria for whether something's newsworthy?
Normal Island News is a parody/satire site, not a news source.
Should've made them slide across the courtroom in their underwear to teach them a lesson.
Sure can!
The post doesn't say who published this. It's just an archive link (yaYKS isn't very informative). I had to click through to find that info. Now it's in the thread for anyone else who wants to know who it is before clicking a random link.
This is a PC Gamer article.
Why are people so bizarrely defensive about this?
This isn't sensationalism. It's a scientific study of actual real-world fuel use based on data from thousands of vehicles (at least ten thousand, I assume, based on earlier studies). If, as the study author says, internal combustion engines are being used more frequently than estimated, should it not be addressed? Should we not be aiming for higher efficiency in these vehicles? If tests aren't accurately predicting usage, should we not develop more accurate tests?
It isn't. They're journalists, not propagandists. Holding their government accountable and reporting on what's happening -- good or bad -- is just the job.
But isn't that like Apple saying "you're holding it wrong"?
I don't think it's being portrayed as a manufacturer conspiracy. When Porsche says their tests are "based on the legally prescribed EU measurement procedures," I'm sure they're not lying. But these data say pretty clearly that those tests don't predict observed reality. If they don't, what good are they really? Shouldn't we use testing that better reflect observed fuel usage?
How is it misleading?
Manufacturers make claims about fuel consumption. Based on studying real-world data, fuel consumption is significantly worse than claimed. The study authors say that internal combustion engines are active much more frequently than claimed. They propose that manufacturers and regulators use real-world data because it's more accurate. Is that such a bad idea?
If only. Unfortunately, there's a legal process to leave but no process to expel.