[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Are you supposing that any scrap of unscientific propaganda in a person’s opinions makes them functionally a fascist?

No, that's why I separated the two in my argument.

I posit that someone can doubt the science and believe in liberalism.

How in good faith does a neoliberal doubt the science? They definitely incorrectly doubt the magnitude of change to our society that is required to fix climate change, sure. But the science itself?

Hell, I think some of the people who voted for Trump still believe in liberalism (not that they would call it that) even as they enable fascism.

Neoliberalism is part of how those people got to fascism. It's much easier for a fascist to convince people to adopt fascists positions when they already have neoliberal ideas in their head. Neoliberalism only allows change to the people in charge of systems. It's a smaller jump to convince neoliberals to change the people in society than it is to convince them to change institutions they believe are infallible.

This descent into madness has been really hard to watch.

Yes, but in hindsight it is clear how we got here. Neoliberalism and the right-wing information sphere are two of the major culprits.

If any of them were to renounce Trump, I’d welcome them eagerly.

We don't get this for free though or by comprising all of our positions. Democrats have been trying to reach across the aisle for a while. They failed in this election in large part because of that continued attempt to reach moderate Republicans. What Democrats need is a populist narrative. This will rally people around our side of the issues.

I think you risk not being able to solve anything because you’re so picky about allies. I think improving climate policy remains possible with a minority of climate deniers in the tent.

Not if we have to comprise our positions to get them in the tent. We need full speed ahead on climate change action. If we have to go the speed we are now, slower, or backwards like we will be in a few months, then that isn't a useful alliance.

I don’t know, do you really want to compare comprehensive political positions?

I think you're referring to harm to other living, breathing people. You want to be a part of the big tent? Time to spill the beans on your positions. Whether they're considered political or otherwise. A bulleted list is fine. edit: typos

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

But like maybe you should have read the article you posted.

I did. Biden should have done more. But he didn't do nothing.

You’re just interested in anyone who is even remotely dissatisfied with Democrats shutting up or being shut up, regardless of what Democrats do.

I want people to be vocal. You're doing that. I disagree with what is being said.

Dude, I fucking tried to warn about what was going to happen and I wasn’t the only one. At least here on lemmy, it meant being called a trumper and a Russian every last time.

And I tried to warn you people. You played right into the hands of MAGA and the Kremlin. We knew who Harris and the Democrats were. The goal was to prevent fascism anyway. There was no other viable strategy, but people still tried to sink Harris' campaign anyway.

I have no remaining faith in the party. Not after this election.

The Democratic Party is a tool, not a friend you need to have faith in.

As did Harris, vague meaningless non-policy promises notwithstanding.

I showed receipts. Reiterate the same lie as many times as you want. It will still be a lie.

Ooh. Were they strongly worded?

What matter's is that it was Biden's decision. People in his administration disagreed with him.

This thread is about Democrats. Of course Trump is worse. That doesn’t excuse selling weapons for an ongoing genocide.

No, I mean you wouldn't still be in this thread shitting on Democrats if you cared. You would want to spend your time going after Trump, since he's going to president, but that's not where you are directing your energy.

I’m telling you not to be a damned fool. The party will sell you out. It’s what they do. It’s a pattern of behavior that you’ve been making excuses for.

That's what I'm telling you. We need to co-opt the Democrats. I'm not making excuses for their behavior, I'm arguing for a strategy to advance our goals. Voting for Democrats until the party is co-opted by a progressive and socialist populist movement buys us time to make that happen. If you read my comments you would know my argument's position by now.

Who is screaming at whom to be silent?

You at me. Be vocal. But do it in a way that is useful.

They’re using you. Not the other way around.

People are definitely using you. They got you arguing against your own interests and you don't even know. Or maybe you don't care. That moral victory is too important to you. edit: typo

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

We're not dead yet. So we're still fighting.

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

“I want to do something” isn’t a policy.

When running for office, that's what a policy is.

The Democratic Party does not agree with this.

Neither do you.

Lieberman didn’t do it alone.

With only a max of 60 votes at any given time and the filibuster, he only needed one. Democrats had to get rid of the filibuster. But as institutionalists they were never planning on doing that.

I guess they thought it wouldn't be fair to do it without Republicans.

With the leverage you keep pretending we have. How do we exercise this phantom leverage? Democrats’ unwillingness to listen is how we got here.

Vote in elections for Democrats. Like we did in 2020.

Democrats don’t work around the interests of their owners. They work for them. Wealth redistribution won’t happen as long as the Democratic Party is run by corporate shit.

We need to co-opt the Democratic Party to get socialist and even progressive policies through. But even currently Democrats would have gotten more done if not for Manchin and Sinema.

And vague references to leverage that we can only somehow exercise by unquestioningly getting behind corporate shit only serves corporate shit.

Refusing to leverage power is playing right into the hands of corporate shit. The worse part is you're doing it for free. Might as well work Musk's Doge department for no pay while you're at it. He's looking for people like you.

https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2024/nov/14/elon-musk-trump

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

I’ve spent the past few decades wanting that party to move to the left and voting for them. They did what you wanted instead and moved to the right.

I don't want Democrats to move to the right. I want people to stop hunting for a moral victory over the Democrats. Progressives voting for them is how we get them to move to the left.

Your argument is fully a straw man now.

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

It will definitely lose them progressive votes. And it probably won't gain them many conservative votes. But the Democrats are still going to try anyway. They look at who voted and chase those people's votes. edit: typo

Most of the country wants a new party, but our FPTP system mathematically guarantees they will never get it.

lol

=/

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

It’s fatalism.

My point here is, “The system that only allows for getting worse will never get better.”

Years of US history demonstrate that is not the case. People have demonstrated it is possible to make things better with our democracy. Women's suffrage and the civil rights movement happened in the US in the 20th century.

Things have been getting worse since Reagan brought neoliberalism to the mainstream. The US wasn't perfect. And on some social issues like gay marriage things have gotten better. But we are where we are now thanks to over forty years of neoliberism allowing the rich to extract wealth from everyone else. We have entered the billionaires forming an oligarchy around a dictator stage of late-stage capitalism.

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

Without industrializing the North could have lost the war to the South as they would have been more evenly matched. The North needed to win the political battle, the war, and then after the war, the culture war. They won the first two, but we are still fighting the culture war.

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

Fixed. Thanks.

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

I live in the US where fascists have put targets on the backs of trans people.

The same fascists have also pledged to let Israel finish their genocide. Weird you don't care about that.

https://www.project2025.org/

https://www.25and.me/?topics=

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

It's not enough. The House elections happen every two years. AIPAC can successfully primary progressive politicians if we don't vote for them.

https://apnews.com/article/squad-aipac-progressives-congress-cori-bush-0de0a96929368db72145b033261415ca

Murphy spells it out. Democrats are moving to the right to get people who aren't 100% with them on social and cultural issues. There is a huge base of people in the US that support Israel. And they tend to be consistent older voters.

https://apnews.com/article/squad-aipac-progressives-congress-cori-bush-0de0a96929368db72145b033261415ca

https://money.usnews.com/money/retirement/aging/articles/why-older-citizens-are-more-likely-to-vote

[-] ToastedPlanet 1 points 6 days ago

https://www.donaldjtrump.com/platform/

Trump ran on a populist platform that wasn't limited to economic populism. Harris didn't have any compelling narrative whatsoever.

It’s the electorate stupid!

It's worth while for the electorate to learn the right lessons. Otherwise there wouldn't be people in this comment section trying to get everyone to learn the wrong lessons.

4
submitted 3 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

Lorcana players picked up on the change quickly. When a set of Ruby Taffyta Muttonfudge cards were revealed during the Shimmering Skies Lorecast numbered 103, 114, and 117, fans immediately noticed that the cards were no longer numbered alphabetically. There was some hope that a new ordering system would reveal itself as more cards were spoiled, but now that we’ve seen the entire set, it’s clear that there’s no logical organization whatsoever. The set is still broken down by color and card type, but within those subcategories, it's a total free for all.

6
submitted 3 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

With the fifth set, Shimmering Skies, imminent, we're delighted to get a look at an as-yet-unseen secret Enchanted card from within. Without further ado, meet the Enchanted Clarabelle: Light on her Hooves!

3
submitted 4 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

Equipped with the Rush keyword ability, which allows Rafiki to challenge an opposing character in the same turn he’s played, in concert with an ability that gives him Challenger +4 in his first turn, Shaman Duelist can quite deftly remove a character with up to 5 Willpower from the board. His utility doesn’t end there either – with 4 Willpower of his own and 2 Lore he’s handy to have in play for a bit of questing after his big entrance.

121
Kalm with Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 4 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/196

[Alt-Text]: Biden faces off with the MAGA movement in a dark souls universe causing Panik and Dark Panik. Meanwhile, in an animal crossing universe, Kamala thinks about Coconut causing Kalm. Text: MAGA Panik Biden Dark Panik Coconut Kamala 2024 Kalm

1
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

The cards from the D23 Collections feature expanded artwork that reaches out to the edge of the cards, showing more of the scenery. It will feature a card from each of the first sex sets including:

  • The First Chapter: Mickey Mouse – Brave Little Tailor
  • Rise of the Floodborn: Cinderella – Stouthearted
  • Into the Inklands: Ursula – Deceiver
  • Ursula’s Return: Bruno Madrigal – Undetected Uncle
  • Shimmering Skies: Vanellope Von Schweetz – Sugar Rush Princess
  • November 2024 Set Preview Card: Oswald – The Lucky Rabbit
4
submitted 4 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

Bucky - Squirrel Squeak Tutor will terrorize Disney Lorcana players no more.

4
submitted 4 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

Ursula’s Return brought two brand-new Starter Decks to Disney Lorcana. Here’s how to upgrade the Sapphire/Steel Starter Deck from Lorcana’s fourth set.

186
submitted 4 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/politics@lemmy.world
3
submitted 4 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

Production company We Are Royale (WAR) created a series of trailers for Disney Lorcana, an immersive trading card game by Ravensburger.

9
submitted 5 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

Disney Lorcana’s fifth set Shimmering Skies has finally been revealed. We’ve compiled everything you need to know about the new set including its release date, new products, and more.

261
I cast Rule Reverse! (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 5 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/196
7
submitted 5 months ago by ToastedPlanet to c/lorcana@lemmy.world

Disney Lorcana fans have a new reason to visit their local hobby stores on August 9 and mass retailers on August 23, as the trading card game launches its fifth set, “Shimmering Skies.” This expansion introduces new characters, mechanics, and cards, enriching the gaming experience for both new and returning players.

view more: ‹ prev next ›

ToastedPlanet

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF