[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

If I correctly remember my psychology lessons from 10+ years ago though, the results of Milgram's experiment has been reproduced countless times which sort of backs up the original point.

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Are you telling me a new Half Life game came out three years ago and I missed it?

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 17 points 2 years ago

It's definitely racist when you say that those are Indian family values. It's not racist is you say those are Sunak family values.

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

I would say it's more like the shape of a duck

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Okay, fair enough. That's not something I've ever encountered. Sorry my tone offended you - I wasn't trying to be a dick.

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I think any reconstruction of a dinosaur where there is just a skull as a refence point will be taken with a fairly large pinch of salt. However, many dinosaurs look fairly similar to other dinosaurs that we do have more complete fossils as reference, so they'll end up being based on those as well.

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Yeah the stuff on the knife is scales, but the silver on the fish is just the skin. The scales are attached to that.

I'd be really surprised if you're finding any fish in big supermarkets that still have scales, even on a whole fish but particularly on a fillet.

You will typically find skin on or skin off fillets, and depending on the fish recipes might instruct to cook them skin side down so you can have a nice crispy texture alongside the softer flesh.

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

What you're describing as scales are not, in fact, the scales. It's just the skin of the fish The scales are removed before the fish is butchered. And yes you can eat it, it's not uncommon.

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Is there any way to make JS safer? E.g. limiting the scope of its access to specific functions (e.g. visual/DOM changes, posting/querying a server only but no local function), or is it just inherently unsafe?

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Is there any way to make JS safer? E.g. limiting the scope of its access to specific functions (e.g. visual/DOM changes, posting/querying a server only but no local function), or is it just inherently unsafe?

[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago
[-] Thepolack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

No that rhymes with has a gun

view more: next ›

Thepolack

joined 2 years ago