Difference is the above mentioned are armored.
An army is not only tanks with big fat guns. All the mentioned assets lay the groundwork for any meaningful operation. What good are drones, if you cannot get a foothold and bring in forces to occupy landscapes?
I mean, tanks and IFVs with infantry take and hold ground.
Drones are use to harass units, saturate AD and basically deny ground taking advances.
These are different tactical issues with their own importance.
A nuthead will still tell you that wind is no equivalent because of missing winds.
You might have to factor PV and batteries in to make a even better point.
Usually they prefer other platforms.
Yea. Sorry for having a conversation. Go on venting. Have my upvote.
And I‘m saying: depending on the situation a well tossed nate from the outside saves you from dancing.
Laughs in deliberate cleaning.
Thank you. I‘ll add it to the post.
So sagen alle Fachleute also Ökonomen und Experten. Aber was wissen die schon?
Einkommenssteuer runter, Mehrwertsteuer hoch ist doch wieder ein Geschenk an Besserverdiener, oder?
Die würden dann % deutlich weniger Einkommensteuer zahlen, aber bei den Grundgütern, die man ja nicht mehr konsumiert weil man vermögender ist, nur „etwas mehr“ zahlen?
Ich meine, am Ende des Tages fressen Leute +/- die selbe Menge an Essen… außer natürlich wir drehen die Mehrwertsteuer so hoch, dass es für die unteren Schichten noch enger wird..
Inspired by !v0ite@piefed.social 's post yesterday some pics from a playtest. I was on an event and had British Army inspired set with a webbing, some MTP and some multicam clothing. I take the webbing and a backpack over my chest rig or plate carrier, when I want to sustain myself for a longer period (24h/48h matches). It wasn't necessary on that particular event, so I switched later on.
Gear is basically:
Not in the picture are my many MTP trousers and combat shirts and Gore Tex. Also missing is my Linderhof chest rig and my Helikon Tex guardian plate carrier: all in MTP and multicam.
I'm planing on adding a springer and a AAP-01 GBB pistol this year.
If you adhere to the strict definition of "A tank is an armoured fighting vehicle intended as a primary offensive weapon in front-line ground combat." you are right.
Still. While we see less tank on tank combat, we see a lot of tanks shooting at fixed positions. Same goes with IFVs as they unload troops or enable tactical advances. They are far from being obsolete but they're using smaller windows of opportunity. And sometime it takes a lot of anti tank drones before a tank had a mission kill. They're still valuable tactical assets.
Edit: found the image which explains the definition problem at reddit.