That’s not the point. It’s not always about changing your view, but being able to defend and maybe refine your view to a more logically consistent position. Even as a lurker, it’s nice to be able to watch debates on positions that you almost entirely agree or entirely disagree with and read the arguments for and against it. I feel it helps solidify my logically consistent moral views of the world and makes me rethink the ones that are not.

I agree with op that this kind of topic and I would say realistically any topic should be allowed. As long as it’s actively moderated and both sides are constructively arguing for or against the position. It’s definitely one of the few communities I missed the most from Reddit and I wish it was as big here as well.

https://www.payscale.com/research-and-insights/gender-pay-gap/

Idk if this is a good source, but if it is then how can you really point to generally .99 to every 1.00 as a really significant issue? If you want to say that women aren’t getting the same opportunities for better job positions then sure that’s probably generally true. However I don’t think you can legitimately say that the adjusted/controlled wage gap is that bad. At least there are many valid arguments for why the unadjusted/uncontrolled wage gap is bad.

Why don’t you have the ability to create tickets on behalf of someone else? It seems like a weak excuse to waste time for something that needs to happen anyway and could be easily explained away to supervisors. I understand the person in the meme is still adding bs on top of the original request but after their account is created then they could make any new requests themselves. Maybe I just don’t really understand the whole ticketing tied to job performance anyway… I don’t really have to deal with this kind of concern myself as my supervisor understands tickets aren’t always filled out properly and I’m also not IT.

It’s called a platformer, not a racing game 💀

Can’t wait to be 800000th in the login queue

I don’t find the data nor the visualization beautiful. It’s just an “interesting” topical post that’s mediocre at best. The same kind of posts kept making it to the top of r/dataisbeautiful. IMO from observing the same thing happen on reddit, these kinds of posts will hurt this community by lowering the standards in both data and visualization.

I do think that there should be other communities that these kinds of post should be allowed in. At least until they are critiqued for being misleading, poorly sourced, or just too low quality.

8 meters for logistics? Isn’t that a lot or is it necessary when everything is packed that tightly?

They did for the god helmet. The wiki page references it as [17] https://doi.org/10.1558%2Fjcsr.v2i2.24573

Look at the number of tabs 💀

https://twitter.com/FordFischer/status/1757536607572279482

For those who don’t want to go through the cancerous ad website.

Jfc I can’t read these shitty websites on mobile. It’s hard to tell what is the article and what’s an ad and where the end of the article is. It makes me want to never click articles again and just keep reading the headlines and comments assuming nothing is being left out or any of it is being exaggerated…

How exactly can you fit this onto 1 sheet of paper?