[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 8 points 11 months ago

Oh BOY. So I'm currently playing an automaton character in a Strength of Thousands campaign (pf2e), and I'm playing her very much like a stereotypical robot: no emotion, strongly rational, all that good stuff. One thing that I've made core to the character is her ability to learn and grow, but I don't like the idea that a lack of emotion is a flaw that needs to be overcome. So, my philosophy is "make her become emotionally intelligent, not emotional".

Sadly, I think with the way I play her, people would anthropomorphize her hard.

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

MAYBE IT'S TIME FOR NEW BONES MF

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Razira's about to go all Monty Python on these fellas.

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ’š๐Ÿ’š

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

Oh, these bitches gay! Good for them, good for them!

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Perfect, thanks dude!

51
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Maaxorus@lemmy.world to c/warhammer40k@lemmy.world

Edit: picture is sideways for some reason, not sure how to fix it.

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

With the new focus point rules, I wonder if there's gonna be any changes to psychic, given that its ability to use two focus points per fight isn't that special any more.

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

How often are we gonna have this conversation? Becoming an Oathbreaker is not the same as breaking your oath. If you actually read up on how you become an oathbreaker, you might understand why it's an evil only subclass.

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

As it's described it seems a lot more choice-based for changelings than for fluid people (at least to my knowledge), but I can see there being genderfluid changelings who alter their appearance based on their current gender.

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

According to official Eberron lore, gender is just another aspect of themselves to change and morph around, which I interpret to mean that most of em are pangender or gender apathetic, or something else along those lines.

[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

I have an elven Barbarian whom I have been meaning to use in a campaign for a while now. tl;dw: His dad is an abusive racial supremacist who had very fixed ideas of how my Barbarian should be and act like, but could never live up to.

Just recently I realized that he could be very easily interpreted as a trans allegory, and decided to go the extra mile. So now he's a trans man.

5
submitted 1 year ago by Maaxorus@lemmy.world to c/aromantic@lemmy.ml
5
submitted 1 year ago by Maaxorus@lemmy.world to c/aromantic@lemmy.ml
[-] Maaxorus@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hello! I know I'm late, but I had to say something. It seems to me you might have misunderstood how the whole aromanticism deal, or orientations in general, work.

Being aro is about attraction, not action. Choosing not to date is not the same as being aromantic, just how choosing to get into romantic relationships doesn't make you automatically allo. Aromanticism is a huge and complex variety of experiences, but none of them ever cite their lack of attraction as a choice.

As for you, maybe you only realized it recently or it changed overtime (yes that can happen), or you're an allo who decided they're happier not trying to pursue a relationship. These are possible explanations that I could think of and given the sheer breadth of the aro experience, there might be other explanations, but I'm not going to pretend I know more about you than you do. Either way, these are all perfectly fine ways to feel and I'm happy you figured something out for yourself. Just calling being aro a choice does not sit right with me.

view more: next โ€บ

Maaxorus

joined 1 year ago