Russia is like the black knight: You can destroy all their oil refineries, main train tracks, kerch bridge and the military euqipment and they are still delusion to say: "Te Black Knight always triumps".

If they are that tone deaf that you tried to destroy all his limbs and he still has the audacity to not leave your country... well, maybe then the Kreml needs to loose his roof. It is not like Russia didnt bomb the govermental buildings all time or were carefull with preservation of historical heritage. So lets see their long faces when there are no bulbous spire anymore. Bomb away suckers. GTFO of Ukraine!

Ja.

Wiki: Good Tsar, bad Boyars

"Good Tsar, bad Boyars" (Russian: Царь хороший, бояре плохие, romanized: Tsar khoroshiy, boyarie plokhiye), sometimes also known as Naïve Monarchism, is a Russian political phenomenon in which positive actions taken by the Russian government are viewed as being the result of the leader of Russia, while negative actions taken by the government are viewed as being caused by lower-level bureaucrats unbeknownst to the leader. Originating from the Russian Empire, the term has since been used to refer to the leaders of the Soviet Union and post-Soviet Russian Federation, particularly during the rule of Vladimir Putin.

Man beachte wie Russland mit der AFD in DE genau es anders rum macht: "Obere Regierung alle unfähig und schuld, aber die feinen AFD Boyars in den Ländern werden aus Berlin gezwungen diese schlechten Dinge zu machen!" - Versteht aber kein AFD Wähler weil deren Russland-Propaganda-Bildung nur bis zum Telegramm-Handy reicht.

That actually aged well:

Ultimately, the goal of our sanctions is to make this a strategic failure for Russia. And let’s define a little bit of what that means: Strategic success in the 21st century is not about a physical land grab of territory. That’s what Putin has done. In this century, power — strategic power is increasingly measured and exercised by economic strength, by technological sophistication, and your story — who you are, what your values are, can you attract ideas and talent and goodwill. On each of those measures, this would be a failure for Russia.

Daleep Singh, February 24, 2022

Deputy National Security Advisor for International Economics and Deputy NEC Director

source

Bubátzý 👍

Russians are basically the Smokers from Waterworld.

Nuclear Power is heavily subsuidezed in France. Most in france related to nuclear are state institutions. Including the Energy Company EDF and the scientific institute CEA. It is often phrased as a state-in-state with a lot of undisclosed structures and money funds. They were created when France saw in the 60s that they need also a nuclear bomb and hence developed a state-close structure that until today in not giving out too much informations. The French citizens pay with their taxes for their nuclear power plants. Heavily. And they hide it behind a lot of structures. Who is paying for the construction? The Repair? The Decomission? - Right: French citizens. If if calculate all these cost into the bill, Nuclear energy is one of the most expensive energy forms there are.

The real reason is, that right now and in the next decade, all the Boomers ago going to retire and this piece of shit Merz tried everything with his party for the last 20 years to not solve the problem on how the retirement fund will handle all these boomers. So his fucked up answer? Let the young again and again cut back for the Boomers to have a flourish retirement.

FUCK YOU FOTZENFRITZ!

Es gibt keinen Inhaltlichen Diskurs, da es keine Ausrichtung an der Realität gibt die den Rahmen gibt. Oder wie Markus Gabriel es sagte: "Der Diskurs dreht sich die ganze zeit nur darum ob Caesar ein gelbes dreieck ist. Ist Merz ein blaues viereck? Alice weidel ist ein lila kreis!" - Will sagen: Es gibt keine Inhaltliche Ebene auf der man gewinnen kann, da es keine Fakten gibt. Wie sähe deiner Meinung nach eine Inhaltliche Auseinandersetzung mit einem Wahnsinnigen aus? "BRD GmbH/Echsenmenschen/Angela Merkel trinkt Kinderblut" - Bitte begegnen Sie der Aussage *Inhaltlich *mit dem Ziel die andere (offensichtlich wahnsinnige) Person von ihrerm verklärten Blick zu überzeugen, was ein selbstreflektive Aufarbeitung mit sämtlichen Ansichten in der Person anstösst.