975
submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by zaxvenz@lemm.ee to c/europe@feddit.org
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 12 points 21 hours ago

I hate that there is not much societal change going on other then moving business around and rebranding.

[-] RedPandaRaider@feddit.org 2 points 20 hours ago

It's at least a start. We cannot expect our governments to do more, the rest is on society at large. A good start for more change would be the expulsion of any US nationals from EU countries.

[-] AvailableFill74@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago

We can imagine the end of the world. We can imagine the collapse of society, but we can no longer imagine the end of capitalism.

[-] Naevermix@lemmy.world 3 points 21 hours ago
[-] FreddyNO@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago
[-] turnip@lemm.ee 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

This is a CBDC that she wants, something they have been talking about for years. Likely they want this because many European countries wont be able to survive higher interest rates caused by aging demographics, as the US high interest rates suck up global liquidity making rolling over debt more expensive.

They will be able to slow inflation using the programmability of the money to prevent you from surpassing your allotted climate credits, as they are already forcing companies to measure their c02 usage in a system called the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). They will also be able to increase inflation via issuing expiring stimulus, which would allow them to issue stimulus without worrying about the 18 month lag.

What Europe also wanted was a global climate change system, where they collect tax revenue from carbon credits, which would be charged to foreign emitters. Trump recently front run this with his own tariff system, following project 2025's idea of eliminating all international tariffs. Though countries like Canada are talking about joining Europes climate plan instead, I think all countries will have to decide where to hand the keys to their domestic economic policy.

https://climate.ec.europa.eu/eu-action/eu-emissions-trading-system-eu-ets/ets2-buildings-road-transport-and-additional-sectors_en

[-] Formfiller@lemmy.world 47 points 2 days ago

California, Oregon, Washington and Hawaii would also like to request EU status and new non facist payment methods

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 24 points 2 days ago

The Cali data companies will be in for a shock when they suddenly have to comply with any regulation, let alone the GDPR

[-] stiephelando@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 2 days ago
[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 6 points 1 day ago

What I imagine that to contain:

  1. USA! USA! USA!

  2. Communism bad!

  3. See 1 and 2

[-] blarth@thelemmy.club 1 points 21 hours ago

Except if you’ve done any privacy work you’d know that GDPR and CCPA are accounted for simultaneously in almost every case, so they end up being equivalent in reality.

[-] CMonster@discuss.online 3 points 1 day ago

You forgot New Jersey.

[-] skozzii@lemmy.ca 115 points 2 days ago

Do it! Canada will come play too.

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 17 points 2 days ago

We could add credit cards to the Interac system.

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 97 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Would be spectacular if they make an alternative that does not rely on commercial banks so that having a for-profit bank account isn't required to be able to pay for things electronically. Just like you don't need that with cash. This is something central banks can provide to the citizens of their country. If commercial banks want people's money, they better give an incentive. Currently they get it just so people can access the electronic payment systems.

But if course that's unlikely because commercial banks won't just let themselves be cut out of the sweet deal they got now.

[-] pipes@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago

At least most European banks are happy to cut out the American middlemen (Visa and Mastercard) since they're eating part of the cost, and we already have the infrastructure in place and working, it's called "instant SEPA bank transfer", most newer accounts offer it for free. The problem is the lack of political will to accelerate that indipendence and to stop hemorraging money (roughly 0.5% per transaction!)

Then as people learn to use it they'll hopefully also stop using Paypal (another American company) when sending money to someone, or getting tracked in general every single time they use their debit card.

[-] aeshna_cyanea@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

agreed, this is really low hanging fruit for fixing society in general- services (banking but also insurance (remember Obama's failed public option)) that everyone needs but are privately run should have competition run by the government that is publicly funded and run with the goal of break-even instead of for profit.

Let the for profit ones try to find reasons to exist then!

Other candidates for a public option: ISPs, ride-sharing services, credit rating agencies, etc etc

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

There's also credit unions.

Knowing your nationality, some Canadian provinces do have a public bank too, like ATB in Alberta.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

Does using Google wallet give any fee to Google?

[-] Auli@lemmy.ca 2 points 22 hours ago

No but I stopped using apple/Google pay to stop giving them data. It's a choose your poison though they stop the stores from collecting data as your card keeps changing.

[-] normalexit@lemmy.world 44 points 2 days ago

They don't get paid directly, just with your data.

[-] intheformbelow@lemmy.world 32 points 2 days ago

I hope Canada and Mexico can join. It's time to start bankrupting murican companies.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 28 points 2 days ago

Most card transactions in Norway go through a local system called BankAxept, and have for decades. A lot of Norwegians don't even know, because the same cards also support VISA, and they think that's what they're using.

[-] troglodyte_mignon@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago

Same thing in France with CB. I’ve only recently understood why I was asked to choose between "CB" and "Visa" when paying by card online, when both were written on my card. Actually, when I got my first card as a teenager, I was a bit nervous about that, I was scared of “making the wrong choice” when paying online; I rememberd asking adults around me what that was about and how to choose which one to select, and not one of them could give me an explanation, they told me that there was no difference and that I should just pick one at random. Now I feel kinda bad about all the times that I chose Visa, because from what I understand their fees are generally higher for the seller.

[-] barsoap@lemm.ee 16 points 2 days ago

Same in Germany with the girocard system. Key feature is that there's no real intermediary, it's a standard the banking sector came up with to easily authorise ordinary bank transfers. Online shopping was never an issue in Germany push come to shove you just wire them the money.

And I have no fucking idea why the EPI is launching a whole phone-based system instead/before standardising debit card infrastructure. That app offers literally nothing that I can't already do with my card and bank app on my phone short of a wallet and why the hell would I want that I already have a giro account. And why would I want to send money to a telephone number instead of an IBAN. What kind of stuff are those people on that they think that's a feature.

But at least the general structure of the EPI is similar to how girocard came about: A consortium of banks, public, cooperative, private, coming up with interoperability standards. Germany has like 1400 banks (and that's after a lot of mergers), most of them only serving a district or larger town and surrounding villages for those there was never an alternative to working with each other and the over-regional banks jumped on to not be left out.

Sometimes, all you need is some marketing. E.g. it's been possible to print out a QR code with your account info so you can receive transactions at a flea market for ages (in lieu of having your phone display it and people scanning from there), and ever since SEPA instant payment it's basically cash, as far as the seller is concerned.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 23 points 2 days ago

My main takeaway from the comments on this post is that basically all of Europe solved this a long time ago at the domestic level, but that international interoperability is lacking.

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 12 points 2 days ago

That's the state of literally everything in Europe.

[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

Hey now, we were able to standardize the curvature of cucumbers.

[-] Prime_Minister_Keyes@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Maybe there was a more important need for it. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

[-] jenesaisquoi@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

Standardise*

European spelling is superior to US spelling!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] bus_factor@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I get the phone based system. People remember their phone number and email address, they do not remember their bank account details. It's a lot easier to initiate the transfer in the moment if it's based on something the recipient can just tell you. QR codes are an acceptable workaround for a small vendor, but not really ideal for paying back the friend who paid for lunch.

Pretty much every country has something like that ready or in the works. Venmo is huge in the US, Vipps (which uses the aforementioned BankAxept in the backend) is emerging as the de-facto standard for small transfers in Norway.

It was a bigger deal in the US than elsewhere due to how hard it is to do bank transfers there, but the rest of the world is also very keen on the concept.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I know that both Portugal and The Netherlands also have their own local systems, but you can't really use the system of one country in another country.

The only country in Europe which I know for sure doesn't have its own local payments system is the UK, though it would not surprise me if there are others.

What's really needed is some sort of pan-european payments system, ideally one which also gets accepted in the rest of the World. The closest we have to it at the moment in the EU is that you can do normal (so called SEPA, if I remember it correctly) bank transfers to any account at any bank in the EU, all for the same cost (generally free) independently of it being in the same country or across borders, and quite a number of retailers all over Europe do accept payment via bank transfer, but that's not an actual payment system, it's a bank transfer system that you sometimes can use to pay an online order from a retailer.

As things stand now, if for example from my Portuguese bank account I want to buy something from an online store in Germany, the payment has to go via Visa (Mastercard isn't really common in Portugal)

[-] pyre@lemmy.world 25 points 2 days ago

with all the transactions all around the world can you imagine the money they're making by doing literally nothing and if this move is successful how much money they stand to lose? I would be surprised if they were not literally talking to hitmen right now.

[-] Lachs@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago

I can recommend the Aquired Podcast Episode. A 3h long Story of how VISA became the world leader and how much profit they make year over year. It is craaaaazy. We need to get rid of Visa and other US bases payment providers ASAP!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kidplayer_666@lemm.ee 40 points 2 days ago

HEY GUYS! YOULL NEVER GUESS. Portugal already has such a platform! Even Romania has started using it!

[-] jmcs@discuss.tchncs.de 69 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Everyone and their cousins have their own platform. That's the issue. No one wants to standardize on someone else's alternative so the incumbents reign supreme.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[-] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago

All for it! The orange fucking idiot is fusing the EU.

[-] schnapspraline@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

D€ will hopefully replace them. Important FAQ

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Wimster@lemmy.wtf 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

WERO is coming all over Europe. Germany, France and Belgium are already connected and this year also in the Netherlands. It's happening but ofcourse.... much too slow for many of us :-) www.wero-wallet.eu If they realy want to be innovative they should use blockchain technology to make it happen.

[-] CyberEgg@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 2 days ago

If they realy want to be innovative they should use blockchain

Lol

[-] pipes@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 days ago

I can already send money instantly, for free, through SEPA without a singular private company earning a cut or tracking me.

A bank account is needed, but there are thousands to choose from, and in the EU by law they cannot refuse to open a basic account for a private EU citizen.

Why should we use Wero/Revolut/Venmo/whatever instead? Intercompatibility within just one network means another network effect, that does not look like a long term solution to me. Just like Telegram, though very convenient to use with a nice UI, is no solution to Whatsapp.

Wero seems to be solving the problem of copy-pasting our IBAN. What if any bank app would just recognise a standardised QR code with that data? Who would then subscribe to Wero with a phone number and email and risk getting scammed or blocked for any random reason?

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 2 points 1 day ago

SEPA is not instant. It's still one day as standard.

You can't use SEPA to pay in the grocery store, because the cash register has no way to confirm your payment until tomorrow. That's the thing cards and various apps like WERO solve currently.

Most of these apps are tied to a traditional card, but some are tied directly to the bank account and some can do both.

Anyway, the independence from American software is still far away, since most people will be using Android or iOS to use those apps..

[-] pipes@sh.itjust.works 1 points 16 hours ago

The standard bank transfer takes at least a day as you said, but the instant one is regulated to take less than 10 seconds in total (in practice, it feels instant). Apparently introduced in 2017. I've had it on my home banking (app too) since then I think, but from my previous bank account they cost a whooping 7€, with my current bank the instant transfers are just as free as the normal ones so I use them all the time. I recently bought a used motorcycle within a morning thanks to this.

Wero itself is likely based on SEPA Instant Payments.

I was comparing them to the services used to send money to other people, but of course as you said the big thing we're still missing is a unified point of sale payment network in all of the eurozone, maybe Wero will be the one, in that case I'll be happy to use it, but IMHO we should have a standard public one based on SEPA Instant payments.

Wero is an added step on top, still much better than the competition, but they're currently a convenient alternative to bank transfers (for people who didn't discover the instant SEPA ones), and also as you noted unfortunately based on apps that run solely on American platforms. It's mentioned on their wikipedia page too. I'll keep an eye on them though, they could still work for me, we'll see.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2025
975 points (100.0% liked)

Europe

5273 readers
1114 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS