[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 hour ago

I love coming back to random responses because I still take a good 10 seconds squinting at the image trying to remember what it says

23
submitted 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) by LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de to c/meanwhileongrad@sh.itjust.works

Found this comic strip on mastodon and honestly I just found it funny how Zuck looks in this art

There's good alt text on the mastodon post for those who can't read it well from here!

8
submitted 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) by LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de to c/onehundredninetysix

Sauce: The Greatest Estate Developer

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 hours ago

I mean I don't particularly hate having to compile everything myself, and your point about minimum requirements should've hit me wayyyy sooner. I really only planned to try RISC-V on my laptop since I only use it for productivity purposes anyways

6
submitted 3 hours ago by LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de to c/riscv@lemmy.ml

Hello all,

I've only done very basic research on RISC-V as the DeepCompute RISC-V mobo caught my attention. For the software side, I know that support will (probably) come with time, so I can't really do much besides lament over it huh?

The main thing that caught my eye is that the DeepCompute mobo seems to only accept SD cards for storage. Is this a hard limit of RISC-V or is it just a limit of current technology (i.e. we need time to build something over RISC-V like x86_64/amd64?)?

I've also heard that Linux ran vaguely slow on RISC-V architectures, but ive only heard it as a passing comment. How true is this? Would future developments/putting in more time like for the decades behind x86_64 developments alleviate the speed issue?

Thank you all!

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 3 hours ago

Guys it's OK I'm not a vampire, I 10x the garlic in every recipe I come across

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago)

So is it [bloːhaj]? I was trying to say [bloːhɑj] but [ɑ] feels perhaps odd next to the glide?

Completely an inference from https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:IPA/Swedish so I may have fucked up the phonotactics

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 4 hours ago

It's been a long time since my Field Methods, class, but I remember that (Central Atlas) Tamazight had some interesting pragmatics because it seemed to have both a nominal and verbal forms for adjectives, including color. We got some cool sayings that pertained to associating color and action.

Alas, it was also a very BAD quality Field Methods class. Our prof couldn't even figure out the region (because of poor elicitation choices) and it turns out the way the elicitation was being done, our consultant gave us SVO instead of the normal VSO 😭 (but still grammatically correct? But infelicitous). But you know, bad profs r a story for another time lol

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago

I keep seeing people put random content on PH and go viral, and atp I think it's time I start an abstract algebra course on OF (wait that's just tuition...)

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 hours ago

Praying the spirit of William Harrison occupies him today 😔

48
rule + question (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) by LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de to c/onehundredninetysix

Do you guys post something everytime you visit a post FROM !onehundredninetysix@lemmy.blahaj.zone or just everytime you decide to scroll through the community?

Also I stole this image from someone and idk who it was or the original source so 👺

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 15 hours ago

What is stable? I just run nix flake update then brew a coffee to accompany me for the next 12 hours

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 15 hours ago

C for [ˌt͡ʃɛ.kʰɪ.sl̥oʊ̯.ˈvɑ.kʰi.ə] (Yes I did narrow transcription for the purpose of making it look worse 💀)

38
rule (discuss.tchncs.de)
submitted 22 hours ago by LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de to c/onehundredninetysix

Sauce: I think Solo Max Level Newbie?

19

And fuck I got trapped! Enjoy a picture of chad Kim Dokja from ORV drawn by the artist of Nano Machine :)

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 day ago

I have quite literally dreamed about running neo/fastfetch 😭

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 day ago

I quite literally did this yesterday, but it's OK, my roommates already did before me :)

[-] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

You know, this ain't so bad

9

If we look into a far off distance at an object travelling towards Earth, shouldn't we be able to see both the light from the object at some time t plus the light at some later time (t + delta t)?

Let's also assume that the object is traveling fast enough that it is discernable. This point might be moot, since I'm not sure if such a situation is possible. I know that Rayleigh's criterion could give us a lower bound for how far the images of the object has to be, though I'm not sure how complicated it would be to throw redshift into the mix.

This seems like one of those "Whoa this feels see weird causally but it's just a natural consequence of things we've observed thus has little repercussions as to what limitations physicists actually work around." Actually, I could see perhaps long exposure photos (or the telescope equivalent, if it exists) could run into issues.

view more: next ›

LGTM

joined 4 days ago