We have test-phishing mails sent by our IT-Sec team on a regular basis. There's usually an obvious one and a better made one. First round 10% clicked the obv. one, 99% the good one.

We had a lot of trainings after that.

Last year the numbers went down to 5% and 80%.

If your security concept relies on both of these numbers being zero, you're an incompetent hack trying to shift the blame on end users instead of doing your job.

Ironically making them more corrosion resistant, by doing so....

So, fucked up public transport is a necessity?

You don't know why you don't ask women if they're pregnant?

Reddit is great for watching communities being radicalized. Wehther they do it themselves or they get a psyops push is up to everyone's guess but I've watched it several times.

SRS: Started out as a community pointing out misoginy and racism, ended up as a very weird hate group. I didn't watch it that closely, only saw the result.

some tumbler centered sub i followed, I forgot the name: same story, started quite light hearted, making fun of stupid shit said by kids on tumbler, turned into a right wing hategroup. This one I witnessed. They ran out of material quick, started posting lame shit but now they gave it their own, made up context in the comments. After a while, people who pointed out obvious satire got downvoted.

Sacrifice? Tf you on about?

When they sacked Clarkson for hitting a producer, I was like: But he also punched Morgan, shouldn't he, like, get one free for that?

I only ever use those sites if i really disliked a movie but can't figure out why.

As a way to select a movie they're really pointless, I think a system that matches tastes of people and recommends movies based on that would be more promising.

Sure does! But nothing will happen, you're essentially a 100% safe running pump and dump schemes as long as you only rip off poor people.

Check out Coffeezilla's yt channel, there's loads of obvious fraudsters out there, nothing ever happens to them.

Ja man ist doch immer wieder überrascht, wie schwer manchen das Denken fällt

It isn't. Just as declaring yourself a sovereign citizen isn't a loophole for whatever idiots claim it's a loophole for, declaring illegitimate use legitimate isn't a loophole.

Actual examples for legitimate use: Storing someone's address if he wants to send you something, using someone's IP-address to serve him data while he's on your site.... If it's necessary it's legitimate.

Deutsche Bahn is being sued right now just because of this, here's the initiative that is suing them: https://digitalcourage.de/

Send a few bucks their way instead of spreading false information on the Internet.

Tis is not not ok, actually. I'm a software dev for a European company. I'm briefed by our lawyers.

"Legitimate use" isn't just a phrase from cookie law, it has a very specific meaning.

What's legitimate use? Well, any data I necessarily have to store for our business relation I can store. For as long as I need it. For example: You want me to send you something? Gonna need to store your address. After I sent the package I don't have any need for your address any more so I'd need your explicit consent to store it longer.

Another example for what is considered personal data: IP addresses. Which I store for as long as you watch my site, so that would be another example for a legitimate reason to store personal data.

Still I don't get why they display this banner. To my knowledge it's not necessary to inform the user about storage for legitimate reasons.

All that said, there's plenty of examples of companies illegitimately storing personal data, google is a good example they were sued only yesterday (fitbit)