Hell not having a good idea on what harm reduction in politics is negates efforts of socialist activism
It's typically a safe assumption as most of the time when people are talking about voting third party the third party candidate is most similar to the Democrat on the ballot.
But of course if the person wasn't going to vote if the third party candidate wasn't on the ballot then their lack of a vote is ensuring that the candidate they like the least has an easier time winning.
That makes sense given how efficient those things are
Those things are crazy efficient
And by not voting you're ensuring that positive change will have a much harder time occuring.
Local elections are very important and pushing for more progressive local candidates can help to influence policies on the national stage. And if there's no candidates you like in your locality you can try to run yourself.
There's more elections than just the election for president.
There's no such thing as the perfect candidate so voting for the person you hate the least is the best option for preventing the person you hate the most from winning.
I'm not a fan of Biden but he's way fucking better than trump and his fellow Republicans.
Don't make the mistake of believing that just because you haven't seen something that it doesn't exist.
We all exist in media bubbles and in those bubbles we miss a lot. By seeing this meme you could say that your media bubble has finally bumped into the bubble where people openly talk about not voting.
Hell there's comments in this comment section on the note of not voting.
Local elections are also very important and really need participation. Like if you wanted that fee for mail-in voting to go away that would likely be a decision made by local politicians.
And without voting there's no hope for change for the better
Congratulations on ensuring our system has a harder time improving
It's an incredibly stupid movement where people are saying that they won't vote as a protest to not liking either candidate.
Usually said by people who have little to lose if Republicans win, seem to think revolution is a viable possibility if Republicans win, and/or think that by not voting something good might happen.
Also people who don't understand that our system is a First-Past-the-Post system and the only group of people who are trying to get support for not voting in this election are people on the left.
So I'm not as many words: people trying to guarantee a victory for trump.
Should all minimum wage jobs be closed between the hours of 9pm and 4pm? No, in fact a decent amount (if not all) need done in some capacity throughout the day.
Or another one that those kinds of people don't like to be asked: So if the minimum wage is for children (high school students getting their first jobs), what should be the minimum wage for adults?
She (and the people like her) fail to grasp so much about their arguments it's infuriating. They feel that those who work minimum wageshould suffer. Usually they'll talk around saying it, but that's the just of what they say.
I'm not even sure what that means
I assemble 1 and keep the box
2 night stands for the price of 1
It's obvious from the way they engage with others here, they want you to not vote so trump has an easier time winning.