[-] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

I'm part of a distributed team which already makes this information available to everyone. It means when you go to message someone and it says they're in the same office as you that you can just go and talk to them.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 5 days ago

Right. Everyone. But only a minority of Chinese use vpns, and it's a fraction of those who use them for anything other than work, from what I've found.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 5 days ago

Why is carol bitching about what she can see on teams that she can't see looking around the office already?

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 0 points 5 days ago

Something with politics or political in the name. Idk, but shitposts are supposed to be dumb!

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago

It's not a meme, joke, banter, dumb comment or light-hearted observation. What's your idea of shitposting?

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 4 points 6 days ago

Does the average republican believe the government's characterisation of this as the fault of the democrats? What about the average American?

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 1 points 6 days ago

Jesus.

As far as I can tell, you are arguing that it won't become impossible to use a VPN. But no-one has said that it will be, and what I and others are trying to point out, is that VPN usage will become more difficult and rare. The vast majority of people will be restricted from viewing the content that the government objects to, whatever that is.

If you have anything to say about that rather than repeating the point that, yes, for the knowledgeable, for the tech-literate, for the people with the will and the spare time and the energy, VPN usage will still be available, feel free to. Maybe you think that actually everyone will use a VPN - why? why won't a massive reduction in marketed options not reduce usage massively? Maybe you think that actually it doesn't matter - why? why does it not matter that the average person will be unable to get information censored by the government?

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 3 points 6 days ago

I thought this article was complaining about something that no-one used, but here you are recommending alternatives... alternatives that are not curl

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 2 points 6 days ago

You don't seem to be accounting for the strategic value of the car industry, which is what the person above was talking about.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 18 points 1 week ago

Someone doesn't know what OCD is

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 25 points 1 week ago

Dividing between providers is not what people would be doing if the resilience of cloud services were as is being memed about.

Doing so is phenomenally expensive.

[-] FishFace@piefed.social 23 points 1 week ago

What does the title have to do with anything?

view more: ‹ prev next ›

FishFace

joined 1 week ago