713
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

Amazon Told Drivers Not to Worry About In-Van Surveillance Cameras. Now Footage Is Leaking Online::undefined

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Fpsfrank85@lemmy.world 145 points 1 year ago

It’s astounding how much money they will spend to not pay and treat their employees fairly.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Now, NOT DEFENDING AMAZONS BEHAVIOR OR THEIR DATA HANDLING PRACTICES.

However I do work for a company that has in vehicle cameras and DEAR GOD does it cut down on incidents. We kept having issues with drivers just doing dumb little things to try and save time. like knocking the shifter into neutral and pulling on the handbrake instead of pressing the button on the shifter and moving it into park. Just to be clear, the company has a really lax time/delivery expectation. If you work at a safe, reasonable pace and dont fuck up nobody gets upset with you. But senior management did the math that each driver had to drag out an extra 2 hours a day for it to cost us more than what we spent on compo/vehicle repairs the year before. Once the van had a camera, we saw a 70% reduction in incidents in the following 12 months.

[-] JshKlsn@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're downvoted, but honestly, I understand what you're saying.

My friends all think it's fine to text and drive, even in their employers vehicles. If there was a camera, guaranteed they'd stop texting and driving and become way safer.

People don't like it, obviously. I'd hate being watched. But there's no doubt it cuts down on accidents.

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Yeah thats all I'm saying, that even IF your only goal is to improve safety they absolutely work. If you're also looking to micromanage, slavedrive and violate your staffs privacy you can use them for that too, but thats on you not to be evil.

[-] Distributed@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I work at a company that makes these kinds of cameras. Drivers hate them, but it really does enforce safe driving habits. This makes the roads a safer place, like it or not.

Brings insurance down a lottt too.

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Someone I know is a dispatcher for a company that delivers for Amazon. He says that the management there piles on the deliveries in a way that he doesn't think it's possible for any of their drivers to do the full thing in the time allotted. Every day drivers come in 30-90 minutes late not being paid overtime, and he also has to stay because he has to stay until the last van is back.

[-] reliv3@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Curious.

What are the incentives for the drivers to pull this time saving maneuver rather than doing it the right way?

[-] Delphia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

No fucking idea, we're all paid hourly. Some people like to flex on the others "I did 200 in 6 hours" and some really dont want to do overtime. Some also want to smash through their work and go grab a coffee and play with their phone for 2 hours.

I can jump on anyones route, go do their workload slowly and methodically and get back within an hour of clock off. You have to properly take the piss to get dragged into the bosses office.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 25 points 1 year ago

That’s true, but Amazon pays above the national average, which itself desperately needs to rise.

[-] Stitch@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

This is a stronger indictment of the national work landscape than a boon for Amazon, who has a over 100% turnover rate…

[-] sputtersalt@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

how can you have a turnover rate over 100%?

[-] designatedhacker@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

It's a turnover rate over time. If everyone quit and had to be replaced in a day you'd be at 100%. Anything after that is over 100% for the year.

I've seen rates of 150% bandied around for Amazon. That means replacing 12.5% of your total headcount on average monthly.

[-] sputtersalt@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I'm not great with math so please let me know if I'm understanding this right:

  1. Company has 100 employees
  2. All 100 employees quit
  3. Company gets 100 new employees as replacement

= 100% turnover rate

Then...

  1. Company has the 100 new employees
  2. 50 of the new employees quit
  3. Company gets 50 new employees as replacement

= 150% turnover rate

and so on?

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Turnover rates are usually described annually. If a company has to replace it's whole staff twice in a year, that's a 200% annual turnover rate.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 6 points 1 year ago

Again, I agree.

I’m not an executive, if I could raise the national average for all of us believe me I would.

[-] jscummy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Amazon pays pretty decently but it's just god awful work. I worked in a warehouse briefly and made more than I had anywhere else entry level, but sorting boxes for 9 hours straight on night shifts isn't worth it

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

Above the national average of what?

[-] wazoobonkerbrain@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 2 points 1 year ago

The average reported salary for delivery drivers.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks. I thought they referring to salaries overall which didn't pass the sniff test.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] TwoGems@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] Bobert@sh.itjust.works 66 points 1 year ago

I'm sorry, who's surprised the company notorious for tracking employee bathroom breaks is actively monitoring their employees?

Amazon is the absolute scum of the earth when it comes to how they demand and expect productivity from their workers. Being harassed because you took 10 minutes to shit in a 10 hour shift that wasn't your break or lunch is an every day occurrence.

[-] Shadywack@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

It's odd, the words "employee" and "employees" gets used here pretty often, but Amazon itself goes through a lot of effort to have people as contractors. I know, employees of the contractor.....but still. These gig jobs are just a great way to shift liability and evade responsibility by the company itself. "We tell you exactly what, where, and how you do everything you do....but you're not one of us"

[-] tbblake@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Shocking /s

[-] orphiebaby@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Someone please sue the shit out of Amazon.

[-] bighi@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

It won’t change anything. It’s the US! Amazon will lose, and will be “punished” by having to pay like $2 for each affected employee.

[-] Bishma@social.fossware.space 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, at least we can all rest assured that all the driver monitoring cameras/tech that's being build by default into new consumer cars and trucks will only ever be used for safety.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 6 points 1 year ago

I don’t see the issue, most people at work know they are being watched. Clearly y’all have never had an item stolen by a driver before.

[-] twelve@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

The problem is not the camera, the problem is that amazon is not doing much to preserve the privacy if its employees from these leaks

[-] kakes@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Actually, I do have a problem with the camera.

[-] money_loo@1337lemmy.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And we know that how?

Amazon is a very very large company, completely sealing up something like that would be next to impossible.

Note this doesn’t meant they shouldn’t try, only that I personally recognize the scope of the issue at hand.

Hopefully they find the source of these leaks soon though and patch up their privacy better for the drivers sake, but it’s very likely it’s just another Amazon worker leaking these.

[-] Saik0Shinigami@lemmy.saik0.com 16 points 1 year ago

Amazon is a very very large company, completely sealing up something like that would be next to impossible.

Are you shitting me?

This driver is clearly identifiable. You pull up their manager's information... Look for a Joey (name mentioned in the video) and then interview them. They will give up the three other names or you fire Joey. Then you can punish all 4 of the people who partook in this data leak.

This is NOT "next to impossible". Not even close. Access records could easily be stored in relation to these videos. Information on who's reviewing the videos is trivial to store as metadata.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

We know that because we're watching these videos online even though we don't work for Amazon. The proof is in the pudding.

[-] MyFairJulia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I don't think that a driver facing camera increases the safety of package delivery whatsoever. All it can detect is whether a delivery person is driving, perhaps how they are driving and that's it.

A delivery person can exit the car, take a package of (potential) value out and do whatever. You can still be caught taking the package away from the customer if you do not take it to the customers door first and then not announce yourself. Or make a photo to "confirm" that the package made it to the door.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Is there a third party security handler for this data or is amazon keeping this in house like a bunch of lunatics?

[-] AndThenThereWere4@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I said don't worry about it...I didn't say we weren't using cameras anyway.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
713 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

58845 readers
3977 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS