270
HELLO WORLD! (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

Hey everyone!

I'm so excited to be the new top mod of this community. I've been a part of this community since the beginning, and I've seen how much it's grown and evolved. I'm grateful to the previous top mod for creating this space, and I'm honored to be taking over.

On Twitter, I'm @CantStopPoppin, and on Reddit, I'm u/CantStopPoppin. I've been active on both platforms for over 5 years, and I've always been a strong advocate for diversity, inclusion, and quality content.

I'm planning to make a few slight changes to the community, but I want to get your input first. I want this to be a place where everyone feels welcome, regardless of their background or beliefs. That means that hate speech, racism, anti-LGBTQ+, and trolling will not be tolerated.

I believe that our differences make us stronger together. We can learn from each other and create something truly special. I'm committed to listening to the community and working together to make this happen.

I'll be leaving this post unlocked for 72 hours so that you can share your thoughts and suggestions. I'll also be going through the comments to answer any questions you may have.

Here are a few specific things I'm thinking about changing:

  • I'd like to make the community more welcoming to people from all walks of life. This means being more inclusive of people from different cultures, religions, and LGBTQ communities.
  • I'd like to make the community more focused on quality content. This means promoting posts that are well-written, informative, and thought-provoking.
  • I'd like to make the community more active. This means encouraging people to participate in discussions and share their thoughts and ideas.

I'm open to other suggestions, so please let me know what you think. I'm excited to work with you to make this community even better!

A few things to note:

  • YouTube and Twitter will not be allowed in the community. Only legitimate news sources will be accepted.
  • There may be a "Pundit Tuesday" in the future, but not at this time.
  • Fox News local stations will be allowed, but their syndicated stations and talking heads will not be accepted due to their many dishonest reports and lawsuits.

I'm excited to hear your thoughts!

Thank you again for helping to create, nurture, and seed this community. I'm looking forward to working with you to make it even better!

This post will stay unlocked for 72 hours for an AMA. I will try to answer as many questions as I can, but it may take some time.

I hope to see you all in the comments!

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Cosmonauticus@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago

Please don't turn this into r/worldnews. I'm all for keeping out hate speech but r/worldnews turned into a thought bubble that demonized any opposing ideas that didn't mesh with the mods.

I don't want another echochamber

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Echo chambers are unhealthy and create an environment that pushes out people that could possibly benefit from being in a community that is different from their own views. While I know that is important, I will say this there will be zero tolerance for hate speech. Conversation is encouraged as long as it is respectful, and it does not become a pissing match or promotes hate.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Came here to say, let’s skip the part where anime_titties becomes necessary and just keep it as world news.

[-] Blizzard@lemmy.zip 29 points 1 year ago

This post kind of looks like a corporate e-mail from a freshly hired executive.

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

This is correct I am fresh meat for the grinder cut me up and throw me in! That being said I am more of a poster than leader. Please know this will not affect my ability to help this community grow. Honestly speaking, I just wanted to make sure there was no confusion in anything I said. I am still wearing my floaties so be gentle the left one is flat and I'm trying to swim in a straight line.

[-] somethingsnappy@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Wow, what a very honest way to say you're a shill.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] WhoRoger@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

I meaaaaan I just want world news... With less USA stuff. Every world news sublemmy is 1/2 USA/China/Israel, 1/3 Ukraine/Russia/Turkey and the rest is usually about other oppressive regimes.

I don't quite understand what's about lgbtq+... If there's news, it's news, if there's not, it's not...

I dunno, maybe I should just stop followings any news apart from uplifting ones, because otherwise it's all the same depressing planet. Wars and hunger and collapse and idiots running/ruining everything.

[-] TheSaneWriter@lemmy.thesanewriter.com 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This means being more inclusive of people from different cultures, religions, and LGBTQ communities.

What rule changes or moderation styles are you planning in order to do this? In some cases it's a tight-rope walk, because it's important to both do things like ban or warn those engaging in islamophobia while also making sure that forms of Islam that are intolerant towards LGBTQ communities are not able to use their religion as an excuse. Thanks for doing this AMA, I think openness from the mods is really good for community relations.

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

I've had the pleasure of meeting people from all walks of life, including some who have despised me for who I am. But I believe that everyone has the potential to grow and become the best version of themselves. Life is about second chances, redemption, and education.

That being said, I will not tolerate discrimination against any marginalized group. If you see someone being discriminated against, please reach out to me and I will handle it.

I know that some people grow up around dinner table enablers, who hear hate at the dinner table and grow up being fed it day in and day out. This gives them a twisted perception of reality and the world around them.

It's for this reason why I'm a firm believer in second chances. However, each issue will be dealt with on an organic case-by-case basis to ensure fairness. I know this isn't a firm direct answer, but it's the best I've got.

On another note: I also want to say that I'm tired of trolls, gaslighters, and dog whistlers. I have zero patience for it. If I see any of this behavior, you'll be banned for 16 days the first time, and permanently banned the second time.

I hope we can all create a safe and welcoming space for everyone.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Can you also provide an explanation on why the previous top mod, sabbah@lemmy.world, has been re-added to the mod team?

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Sabbah is still a moderator because they are a valuable asset to the community. They are knowledgeable about the rules and they are good at resolving disputes. They are also a helpful and positive presence in the community, and they are always willing to help out new members.

I'm sure you'll see Sabbah around the community from time to time, and I'm confident that they will continue to be a helpful and positive presence. If you have any questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out to them.

[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

How can you say he is "good at resolving disputes" when he was removed by the admins for permabanning users for disagreeing with his personal beliefs? (To be fair, the users were getting a bit heated, but that doesn't call for permabanning.)

He also moderates 50+ communities in addition to this one, how can he be a "helpful and positive presence" here when his attentions are so split amongst them?

Forgive me for saying this, but your explanation does not exactly inspire confidence in me.

load more comments (24 replies)
[-] HowRu68@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Thanks for all the work. Your intent appears generally good, imo. Always good to have honest normal discussions and exchanging culture and viewpoints.

I also have a couple of questions for consideration:

How will this statement:

"That means that hate speech, racism, anti-LGBTQ+, and trolling will not be tolerated."

work out with fox news?

Also fox is not then only (non unbiased) mainstream news outlet, which might conflict with your intended goal. And, what about spreading intentional mis- or disinformation ?

[-] jeffw@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Fox is the only one that had to settle a lawsuit for lying. That’s different than spin or bias

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Thank you for this. This is what weighed on me while making this choice. It is important to know that their actions may have indirectly contributed to a violent insurrection and the rise of hate-based speech.

[-] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They’ve also publicly and explicitly stated that they are not a news service but an entertainment channel, so their links should not be allowed in here as part of the basic rules anyway.

[-] InverseParallax@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

That's an interesting question, obviously Newsmax should be right out like it's ilk info wars, but what about democracy now and mother.. forget the name?

They haven't been sued as much, but they definitely have similar forms of spectacle.

[-] Transcendant@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Do you mean Mother Jones? They clearly have a left-bias but afaik their reporting is factual (according to Media Bias Fact Check, last checked 2022).

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/mother-jones/

[-] nednobbins@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

They consider Democracy Now! to have a bias left of Mother Jones but also highly accurate. https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/democracy-now/

Asside: I just discovered https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/2023/07/17/the-latest-fact-checks-curated-by-media-bias-fact-check-07-17-2023/ I found that when I was looking at what it takes for MediaBiasFactCheck to consider a source to have "very highly" reliability rather than simply "high" reliability. Spoilers, you basically need to be an academic journal.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Fox News has been criticized for its use of fear-mongering and its presentation of opinions as facts. I would be happy to vet any other sources that you find concerning on a case-by-case basis.

I believe that it is important to have a diversity of news sources, so that we can get a variety of perspectives. However, it is also important to be critical of the sources we consume, and to be aware of their biases.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MargotRobbie@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

What's your criteria for "legitimate news sources"?

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Social media sites (Facebook, blogs, Twitter, WhatsApp, etc.)

Websites and blogs with news that is based on opinion (Medium, Natural News)

Disinformation news outlets with no links to other sources (Empire News)

Sites designed to look like reputable sources (CNSNews.com)

News Punch, godlikeproductions, Infowars and fringe conspiracy theory websites

Clickbait sources that are often found on the edges of websites with compelling headlines and titles to provoke someone to click

I am sure there are more but also know this it will a case-by-case basis and the posts will be reviewed to ensure that they adhere to the guidelines of credibility.

I hope this helps

[-] nednobbins@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

This is a difficult question. I try to focus on the article itself rather than the news site.

The first thing I look for is if they're rambling. That's probably not the best criterion but it's so obvious. If an article doesn't get to the point in the first few sentences it probably doesn't have a point.

The second thing I look for is verification. I already know some stuff about the world. If know the article made some mistakes I'll assume they're making other mistakes. If they are correct about less well known facts I mentally bump up their reliability a bit.

If they make a statement about a fact I expect them to source it. If their source is some equivalent of "trust me bro" I'm getting out my salt shovel.

Beyond that I'll look at the track record of the author and the publication. Do they consistently pass or fall short of the reliable news threshold? If so, I adjust my expectations.

The individual articles or statements come first though. I may have very little confidence in Fox and Friends or in Donald Trump but if they get on TV and make independently verifiable statements that check out then it's true.

In terms of a simple rule that could be practically implemented. Maybe something like, the article must have independently verifiable sources for its claims. One corollary would be, if article A cites article B as a source, don't post A, just post B directly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] kescusay@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Have you thought about coordinating with the other internationally-focused news communities in the fediverse?

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I like this idea but please know at this time I am basically on a tricycle with one bum wheel, and I know I will need all of your input to help me make this community the best version of itself. I will always listen and learn. PM me tell me more I like this idea!

[-] zombuey@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I’d like to make the community more focused on quality content. This means promoting posts that are well-written, informative, and thought-provoking. - what does this mean who is writing posts here?

I’d like to make the community more welcoming to people from all walks of life. This means being more inclusive of people from different cultures, religions, and LGBTQ communities. - was it not before?

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Quality content

I Twitter and YouTube videos can be great sources of information, but they can also be biased and unreliable. We want to make sure that the content we share is as accurate and unbiased as possible.

I also think it's important that posts are well-written. This doesn't mean that they have to be perfect, but they should be clear and easy to understand. If you're sharing an article or news story, it's helpful to include a summary of the main points. You can also add links to additional sources of information, if you have them.

Inclusiveness

I'm glad you mentioned this, I have not been here that long, but I wanted to be clear and to the point about where this community stands when it comes to respecting minorities and marginalized groups. I think it's important that this community is welcoming to everyone, regardless of their background or beliefs. We should all be respectful of each other, and we should avoid making discriminatory or offensive statements.

TLDR: Be Kind😉

I'm proud to be a part of this community, and I'm committed to making it a safe and welcoming place for everyone!

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] little_cow@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

As @neuromancer@lemmy.world suggested would you be willing to ban opinion/editorial pieces?

Also, can you clarify the no spam rule?

Currently, it is "No spamming: Please do not post the same content multiple times or post links to irrelevant websites." yet I was banned for posting too many different articles in too short of a time period.

Thanks for the openness and desire to improve an important community on the fediverse.

[-] CantSt0pPoppin@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Hey fam you good! You are a lot like me when it comes to posting I just had to be sure that you were you and not a robot!

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] nednobbins@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It would be great if there could be some discussion of what exactly "diversity" means. It's one of those words that people seem to assume is well defined but I can't get anyone to define it.

I don't know what the definition should be but I've seen variations that assume different definitions and I'm more comfortable with some than with others.

  1. I have a friend who works at a bank. He bragged that his team was 100% diverse. When I asked him what that mean he said there were no white people on his team. Personally, this seems like a bad definition. I have trouble thinking of "diversity" as the removal of some group, even if that group is otherwise over-represented elsewhere. It also ignores any potential diversity around any other factors; either the traditional political factors such as gender or religion or any diversity of thought (do their analysts include both Frequentists and Baysians?)

  2. Reddit mostly has users from the US. Should we consider a Lemmy community diverse if it represents the predominant views and voices of the US? If that's the case the image above needs more white people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Demographics_of_the_United_States#Race_and_ethnicity

  3. The world is a big place and anyone could join Lemmy. Should we consider a community diverse if it matches the demographics of the planet? In that case the image above has too many white people. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population#Global_demographics

The above focuses on race but it's more widely applicable. This community will most likely consists of mostly US citizens for the near future. If the community is firmly focused on US ideas it will be more about US opinion of the rest of the world than actual diversity. If it actually does include a globally diverse set of ideas it's likely to get pretty uncomfortable for the majority of the people here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
270 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38969 readers
1810 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS