915
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago

Facts tho.

It's always the dudes who are only friends with other dudes that have the most issues.

More of a cultural thing than anything, but it's always good for dudes to have women as friends as well, women are just better at talking about some things. They don't have the same social hangups as a lot of men.

Shits better than it was, but it's still weird when people only have friends of their own gender.

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 56 points 1 year ago

Many women and men do not like their SO having friends of the opposite gender, especially if they are alone together. So that means having a female friend that you can privately confide in is not easy to have or maintain if either party is in a relationship.

The "safest" way to have an opposite gendered friend that you can talk to is one that you only talk to at work during work hours, which isn't an option for male dominated fields(e.g. construction) and men in those environments are probably the most in need of a female friend to talk to.

The irony is that the people who don't want their SO having an opposite gendered friend probably need an opposite gendered friend to talk to.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

If there's that much lack of trust, only having same gendered friends isn't helping anything.

It's just prolonging a bad relationship

[-] Death_Equity@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Product of the times. It used to be that infidelity was uncommon, but it happens with around 35% of unmarrived couples and around 20% of married couples today, with twice as many being the mens' fault, probably due to their own faults not being the men that women deserve.

Around 65% of romantic couples begin as platonic couples.

The best relationships are based on a foundation as best friends. If you can't be best friends, then you can't have a strong enough relationship to make marriage work. There are a lot of people who get married based on expectations and poor reasoning, but the relationships that last are between people who are best friends, can communicate effectively, and naturally meet each other's needs last the longest. That is a narrow band of people per individual which can persist without outside pressure(culture, religion, kids, etc.).

We are so lonely and desperate to have someone to love and be loved by that we end up in relationships that are unsustainable. Meeting someone who actually completes you, or feels more compatible, ruins a workable relationship because it is not harder than the easiest day spent with another person who can only temporarily satisfy the needs left unfulfilled by a relationship with a viable partner.

The grass is always greener, but your grass can be just as green if you put in the work, and that takes effort that may not seem as cheap as hopping the fence. Put in the work and the hassle of switching pasture will be less than the upkeep, that is hard to understand.

[-] orrk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

If there is any given fact about the human condition, it is infidelity, this goes back as far as we have records of marriage being a thing. The modern change is how we see marriage and relationships.

And while I agree on the friends make good relationship partners, it is not the duty, or even the point, of the other person "completing" you. If you want a good relationship, you need to be "complete" on your own, because no one, not even a romantic partner, can do that for you.

PS:

with twice as many being the mens’ fault, probably due to their own faults not being the men that women deserve

you're a "feminist" (bigot who hides behind the veil of equal rights for all sexes, note the massive quotes) aren't you? I would recommend you do some introspection if you really believe yourself a feminist, and why you would victim blame anyone for "not being good enough" real "you made me hit you" vibes here

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] andros_rex@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I really don’t understand heterosexual people that are like this. I’m a gay dude. I’m attracted to dudes, I have lots of gay dudes that are platonic friends. It’s possible to be friends with people without boning them lol.

[-] psivchaz@reddthat.com 12 points 1 year ago

I think the fear isn't that everyone of the preferred gender wants to bone your partner, but that you have no way of knowing which ones do. The uncertainty is what I think gets to a lot of people.

Still, it's silly. If one of the core values of your relationship is that you're exclusive, it's up to you and your partner to honor that, not up to every other person who comes along. If your partner won't respect that if a friend offers, then they don't respect the relationship to begin with and you're better off finding out.

At least, that's my take from listening to other people. I'm not a sociologist or anything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] CryptidBestiary@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago

I get where you're coming from but I've witness toxicity regarding masculinity from both men and women. Honestly, it's definitely possible to have healthy relationships with other dudes. All of my best friends are guys and we aren't afraid to talk about anything, like our feelings. So it's really the company you keep that really matters, regardless of gender imo

[-] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately, "my friends and family are all assholes, must be feminists fault" is extremely common and rarely shaken off.

There's plenty of reasons people night not listen to your problems. Sometimes people just don't have the space. Sometimes they're just assholes.

The reasons I've seen the most frequently stem from the person trying to talk. They're oversharing. They never reciprocate. They never take steps to actually address their problems. They're using their problems to manipulate someone who isn't falling for it.

But in 40 years of adulthood, I've never seen "I'm not going to listen to them solely because they're a man".

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Neato@ttrpg.network 15 points 1 year ago

Same thing with other types of bigotry. The more people you know and/or have to interact with from different ethnicities or backgrounds, the harder it is to blindly hate them. You see this a lot in more diverse places like cities where they tend more progressive and tolerant. And you see the inverse in more remote or rural places that are often more homogenous.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was married for 35 years. In that whole time, my husband had many female friends. It never bothered me at all., because i wasn’t jealous like that. I was never able to have male friends, though. That was always some kind of threat.

I always got along better with guys than women, so I was always turning down outings and ghosting people in favour of my marriage. Now, since we divorced after 35 years., I have no friends at all. He kept his girlfriends from high school (even marrying one within a year of our divorce) and I’m completely alone.

Seems fair.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Couldn't agree more.

If there's one thing I've observed over the years (mainly in professional environments) is that the whole "sausage fest" environment tends towards dick-wagging contests and other less that healthy macho group behaviours.

That said, one of the most toxic machist environments I've ever been in was a workplace were women were present, due to quotas, and management seemed to have chosen them on looks rather than competence.

I suspect that a healthy environment requires both genders present and without any perceived distinction in importance depending on gender. Specifically from my experience, women de jure or de facto present as a different kind of group member (such as being basically "eye candy") isn't going to do much to suppress unhealthy behaviours (it might hide some of the spoken stuff due to fear of legal/HR consequences but it won't change people's thinking and decisions anchored on that thinking).

I suspect the very same thing applies when genders are swapped - there seem to also be disfunctional group behaviours in all-women environments, just different from the male ones (less macho dickwagging, more intrigue and social cliques).

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 79 points 1 year ago

The first act of violence that patriarchy demands >of males is not violence toward women. Instead >patriarchy demands of all males that they >engage in acts of psychic self-mutilation, that >they kill off the emotional parts of themselves. If >an individual is not successful in emotionally >crippling himself, he can count on patriarchal >men to enact rituals of power that will assault >his self-esteem

-bell hooks

[-] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

As someone socialized transfeminine that quote always hit hard. Especially now as I’m older and making closer friends with adult men who are trying to heal from that psychic mutilation I’m seeing all the ways that it runs deep.

And the thing is it’s not a voluntary trade of power for vulnerability. It is backed by violence against those who cannot or will not engage in it. From social isolation to fists this violence keeps those who are uncomfortable in some form of line.

And then we see that men trying to heal from this are often unable or uncomfortable to go to each other for healing and find themselves overburdening their wives and girlfriends for something few of them have the frame of reference to understand. And some of these women have also internalized these ideas of men and push that continued expectation onto them.

Idk that’s at least what I’ve observed of the phenomenon. But I can say that a lot of the damage can be healed and you model a more whole adulthood for your sons.

[-] lurker2718@lemmings.world 8 points 1 year ago

This hits me hard. I am a cis male and currently trying to get rid of something like toxic masculinity, but as you say it is deeply rooted.

I acually never strived for the stereotypical man image, I wanted to have an emotional side. Now i know i always just considered "having am emotional side" just as another kind of requirement to be a good man. So i tried listening to others and beeing open myself, talking about emotional things. But only those, that i thougt were accepted. I never talked about my real worries. They always seemed to ridiculous to me. A good emotially healthy man shouldn't have them or solve them himself. Now it feels pretty dumb in retrospect, but I am no longer letting this feeling stop me from talking about something. In some way I also have the feeling i betrayed other people with a fake personality.

I know this is not the mistake of feminism. I cannot really say what went wrong to land in this position. I do not even know why i tell this now. In some way, I just want to tell my story and hope someone can relate with it. Secondly i want to say, that the following is not obvious for everyone, at least it was not for me: Beeing emotional is not just some requirement for you, it's also about having an opportunity to get support for your worries.

[-] LazyBane@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I feel like trying to frame men's mental health issues as a problem caused exclusively by "the patriarchy and capitalism" seems like it's trying to wash the rest of society of their own personal responsibility to contribute to making the world a better place for everyone. Patriarchy and Capitalism are just tools of the greater power structure of society, which we all have a hand in forming and perpetuating.

And let's not pretend that the feminist movement's tendency to pump out and empower misandrists and misandrist thinking isn't going to have a negative impact men's mental health, especially if we continue to hold feminism as a scared cow beyond reproach or criticism. And let's not pretend the fact that we have the explicitly female coded "feminism" that opposes the explicitly coded "patriarchy" isn't going to give people who don't have a lot of time to philosophise an inherently combative view of the feminism.

It's hard to buy into the whole "actually femismim is for anyone who wants equality" shtick when you're working exhaustive jobs most your life and then you get exposed to the kind of feminist who says men might as well go extinct because they have sperm banks now.

[-] Lilith_the_serpent@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Pretty much every problem we have in modern society stems from patriarchy and capitalism. It is the wrong tool for the job. Hang on.. let me hammer in this screw real quick. It might damage the porch I'm building, but it'll work I guess.

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I don't think this engages with the topic of men suffering under patriarchy.

Many men in society are deeply unhappy, in large part (i would argue) because they fail to live up to masculine stereotypes. Telling men who have shitty jobs, no friends, and no dating life that their problems are their own fault solves absolutely nothing and at worst further isolates and radicalizes them. Men suffer under the patriarchy too, and those who suffer most do not have the power to dismantle it.

I understand that telling people to be kind and compassionate towards people who perpetuate their oppression can come across as insulting but I genuinely think it is necessary. We cannot solve our problems simply by pointing fingers.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] DriftinGrifter 5 points 1 year ago

Thats a gross overgeneralisation

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] yesman@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

So you're saying the conditions exist where men in their workaday lives don't have the time or bandwidth to be aware of the positive messages in feminism, meanwhile radical and controversial feminist messages are put on blast so that everyone knows about that?

Brother, you are soooo close.

[-] LazyBane@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I'm saying it doesn't matter in function.

If you actually care about dismantling toxic masculinity you'd actually take the time to understand men when they do speak out about the things that bother them, instead of trying to turn it around on these men being too ignorant because they don't have the privilege we do to ruminate on society like we can.

Maybe if feminism could do more in their social circles to shut down feminist misandry before it becomes an issue for men, instead of reinforcing toxic masculinity by insisting men should just shut up and deal with it, then these men who are "trapped in the system" wouldn't have these problems with feminism to begin with.

But I suppose as long as we can reaffirm our own perception of superiority towards these lower beings then we'll be fine. Most of the male feminists I see are dudes who are comparatively well off to the average working man, and I don't think that's just random chance. It's easy to be a male feminist when you are in the privileged position to philosophise, but I don't think it's fair to just expect men in disadvantaged positions in life to just eat the same blows we can shrug off.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 10 points 1 year ago

I think you're confusing 'patriarchy' with men in-general.

Of course it's not men's fault that society is failing them, but that doesn't mean patriarchy isn't a part of the systemic problem.

A big part of the suffering of working class men is inescapably about our material conditions, and the way in which society reinforces those conditions through gender roles. We can both have sympathy for those disenfranchised men and recognize the problem and where it lies.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blahsay@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Jeeze yeah you solved it 👎

[-] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Eh, I think posts like this missing the point - feminism has a lot of shades. Some of which are actively harmful to mens mental health, some of which are very supportive.

If it's about everyone having the same rights regardless of gender - I think we're all in favour. If it's about elevating one gender over another to address historical injustice, then I think that's where points of contention lie.

Let's ask the real question - does it have to be a zero sum game? Can we have the former without the latter? Surely we can.

[-] 4lan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It seems society has to swing that pendulum as far to either side as possible every time.

Men the best! Women the best, men evil! Women evil, Men the best!

humans are so fucking stupid, collectively. we just repeat patterns over and over and over

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Men are the problem with men's health.

As a man, the number of times I've been told, by other men, to "man up" when I'm struggling, is too damn high.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] vampire@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

You did it to yourself = we don't have to help or take responsibility

[-] Moneo@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Men are also victims of the patriarchy and do not have the ability to magically dismantle it. What do you gain by having this attitude?

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2024
915 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7709 readers
2699 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS