114
submitted 7 months ago by czardestructo@lemmy.world to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

So I had a verbal conversation with a coworker yesterday and now I'm getting fed very specific ads. No possible way it's accidental. I have most of the microphone access to apps limited, I have Google assistant turned off and no VPA setup in my home. I use a Oneplus 9 pro, does anyone have recommendations on how to further root cause this or just par for the course for using any standard android OS? Have other folks had similar experience after locking down their stock phones?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] noodlejetski@lemm.ee 101 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

your coworker might've looked up things related to the conversation, and the ad provider figured out that you two are in the same social circle. so far I haven't seen any actual research that would prove that ads are tailored based on microphone recordings (and actually seen the results stating the opposite a few years ago), just a bunch of anecdotal stories.

[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

That's actually a great point. He is older and uses a dumb phone but we have been working with each other over 5 years so there are going to be lots of connections to each other. Furthermore this coincidental ad is rare, I haven't gotten one like this in awhile.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 42 points 7 months ago

Every single example of this happening is anecdotal. The people who tried to properly investigate this have not found it to be true. If you find a video of an actual serious research who proves this is true then I'll admit that I'm wrong. Otherwise these types of posts are useless

[-] Ilandar@aussie.zone 7 points 7 months ago

404 Media has been investigating it. They have evidence of companies offering this service, both on their websites and through sources who say they've been pitched the product by company representatives. Many questions still remain but I'm not sure this issue can be dismissed as easily as it once was.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Can you summarize their findings? Did they find evidence that this is being done in the wild without opt in or disclosure? Just because it's possible doesn't mean it's being used. Obviously the tech to spy on people via microphone isn't crazy complicated. The question is whether most apps use it. The amount of data that would be uploaded on people's data plans would be absurd. I'm very skeptical that this is actually widely used in mainstream apps.

There have been SO many tests of this and not a single one has showed this actually happening.... Just because one single company tried to brag about a tech project to get free PR doesn't mean this is actually used...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Shamot@jlai.lu 4 points 7 months ago

A few years ago, I've read an article where the journalists investigated this. They asked to Facebook it they actually do it and Facebook confirmed.

[-] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 5 points 7 months ago

Gonna need to see a source on that one, please.

[-] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I saw at least one serious video about it. It was in Russian though and it's quite old. And maybe I saw one in English too. I don't remember. But I do believe that the microphone usage for targeted ads is true (or at least used to be true) on phones with Google apps installed

[-] guy@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

It's scary how accurate they can predict you with what data they have; they don't need to tap your microphone.

You're on a OnePlus; there's always a status bar icon if the microphone is active.

Think of what led to your conversation? Everything related to it you saw or searched online that could've later triggered you to talk about the subject, could also trigger them to serve you ads about it later. Perhaps your friend was the one, and the ad companies have linked you together, ie. by tracking your location and contacts.

And now you've noticed the adverts, you'll notice them much more, where you'd normally ignore them completely. Furthermore, if you noticed these ads, you might've clicked them or stopped scrolling and stared at them too long in a wtf moment and now the ad companies know, so they'll serve you a whole lot more of the same.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago

I've seen ads for things I've only thought about but haven't actually done any searches or even talked about yet. Innocuous stuff too, like a movie I wanted to buy on DVD. An older movie at that.

It's very eerie.

[-] GustavoFring@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

They are probably just predictions based on the data the advertising companies gathered on you and you just happened to notice the ones that you only thought about.

[-] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Even if it's entirely random you're bound to run into some spooky occurrences.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 7 months ago

You're on a OnePlus; there's always a status bar icon if the microphone is active.

This is a feature I think for all new Androids (at least pixel). BUT it does not cover all apps. System apps can hide it. Quick example, activate Google assistant voice activation. You should be seen the icon all the time, but likely you don't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AnEilifintChorcra@sopuli.xyz 24 points 7 months ago

The amount of battery used and data that your phone would be sending if it was constantly recording and sending the data to Google would be very obvious

Its more likely that Google and Co have just profiled you really well and or you searched for that specific topic before. Or that topic was an ad that you clicked on in the past or that you slowed down when scrolling to look at

Newer android version notify you in the top right when your microphone is active and you should also be able to see when the last time, down to the minute, that any app accessed the mic in settings

[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 7 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Not possible. To be explicit, he was asking me my opinion about car maintenance and if I changed the oil in my cars every X miles OR every six months, or if the expiration time of oil was BS. I told him my opinion was that the age of the oil is irrelevant unless you idle your car for many hours at a time, just change it based on the millage. Today I got fed an article about how a dude tested the oil from various cars, with various ages and miles against brand new oil and found that age made no difference on the key characteristics of the oil. That is a remarkably specific article from a VERY specific VERBAL conversation I had over a Teams call on a work computer. It certainly got me thinking but again its the first time I've had one of those super specific ads in a long time that made me question my privacy.

Edit: I'm getting down voted, so people don't think this is a markably specific ad response? People really think Google is just this good to infer this type of article in less than 24 hours is just dumb luck because 'oil change'?

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 18 points 7 months ago

Every day, millions of people discuss oil changes. If an article (was it an article or an ad?) is published on oil changes on X date, it is going to coincide with a large number of unlinked conversations. Today, it was you.

Once is a coincidence, if you can prove a pattern then you should concerned.

[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

It was an article not an ad. And the specifics of oil age vs millage is pretty damn obscure in my opinion especially for a guy who works in tech.

[-] CameronDev@programming.dev 5 points 7 months ago

It may be obscure, but that doesnt make it less of coincidence. Also, there is a pretty significant cross.over between tech people and car people (and a greater crossover with car owners).

[-] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 3 points 7 months ago

Well, I'm not going to downvote you because I think it's a good contribution and conversation, but I do think that is a coincidence. They know your interests and stuff and it's black magic how good they are now of making these coincidences happen, but it's not the mic. To much data to process and send

[-] izstranger@freeradical.zone 3 points 7 months ago

@czardestructo @AnEilifintChorcra

So.. It's cool to ignore the date and just change oil at the recommended mileage?

(My car is very rarely driven right now and I've often wondered this)

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I usef to be that "Google fan-boy", until I added a Pihole to my home network. Suddenly my phone's battery had improved by about 8% after about a week. Then I decided to install CalyxOS on my (at the time) Pixel 4 XL. My battery started to literally last at last at least 50% longer (from almost a full 24 hours from 100% to about 10–ish. You can say what you want, and it may not be the microphone or caneamra, but the fact is that phones (android or apple, it makes no difference) are constantly sending data to their servers, regardless of if you're using the phone or not. Don't believe me? Run a PCAP for 24 hours and you'll see, at the very least, 60 hits per hour to Google if you're on any android phone, and more on Apple because it send to Google and Apple (never kind whatever else you have installed on your phone). And Samsung is the worst offender on the Android scenario, because they regularly send data without consent to their own servers, Google and Meta (doesn't matter if you dont have any meta software installed, they still send metadata regularly). Again, I can't confirm nor deny the violation of your privacy via mic or camera, but the data transfers to those servers is not only well documented, they actually mention them to you the moment you're setting up your device. And before you say anything, Microsoft, from my stand point, is second only to Meta on this ridiculous data collection crap.

[-] AnEilifintChorcra@sopuli.xyz 9 points 7 months ago

I've been deGoogled for years, the battery saving was probably from not having Gapps running in the background, I know that Googles and Co are constantly phoning home but to say that they are turning on peoples mics and either running a service locally to transcribe the audio or sending whole audio files to themselves for marketing is unsubstantiated and a bit ridiculous, there's way easier ways to profile users through behavior analysis on their phones whether it be what apps and how long they use them or what posts/ ads user either scroll past slower or actually tap on.

There's a very obvious difference between a few kilobits of text and a few megabits of audio and people would easily see if megabits of data were constantly being sent to from their phones every day

Why waste so much energy and bandwidth trying to figure out what the mic picks up when the majority of it would be inaudible because of background noise or phones being in peoples pockets/bags when they can glean so much more data from how a user interacts with their phone for so much cheaper

[-] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

That's why I said I can't confirm nor deny that's the case. At this point, I'm just too paranoid about every single big tech corporation out there. I went from calling the people that taped webcams crazy to having a large variety of covers for every single webcam in my possession. The same with the security cameras. From having Arlos, Wyze and all that to getting rid of all of them and now self-hosting all of them with frigate. At the end of the day, be it data you upload willingly, surveillance over what you do on your devices, microphone, camera or none, the creepy level we're at today is just insane.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] watersnipje 22 points 7 months ago

The thing with tailored ads is, you’re more predictable than you think you are. Source: am a data scientist (not in advertisement).

[-] thanatotus@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago

It's more likely that ad networks are showing you ads based on the other person being in vicinity and having things in common. I don't think voice snooping is the main cause here

[-] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I have 0 apps allowed microphone access all the time.

There is no evidence that phones are snooping on people, but I would say even if unlikely it's a reasonable concern given what companies do get up to.

However it is more likely the ads were being served because of all the other data you're allowing Google to scrape from you all the time rather than the phone mic.

Rather than focusing on the microphone, look at the bigger picture of how your data is being pillaged by Google all the time.

For me, I switched away from Gmail, stopped using their search engine, use Firefox and not Chrome, and don't use their other services where possible. I have android on my phone and use Google maps and Google home. It's still a huge problem but I use that part of the ecosystem for convenience and no other. Similarly on PC I don't use Google for anything where I can avoid it, use Firefox containers to keep Google, Amazon, Microsoft, and Meta data as separate as possible, plus I use Linux and VPN as needed, and lots of privacy extensions in Firefox.

It's possible to minimise your data exposure to the big tech companies, but difficult to severe completely. You could go even further and switch from android to Graphene OS (I have seriously considered this).

I would go by the principle of compartmentalising your data as much as possible and limiting access to snooping eyes. The transition can be hard but once you've done it you get used to using disparate unnonnected services. Like I really don't need or benefit from my email data being connected to my data storage or my search engine; it's a false convenience that benefitted Google only.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Crack0n7uesday@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

me and a coworker tried an experiment almost ten years ago where we would whisper "breast milk pump" into a phone that had it's screen locked and everything. About two weeks later started seeing ads for expecting mothers, we are both dudes...

[-] lud@lemm.ee 12 points 7 months ago

I had a friend that was convinced that facebook was listening because she was talking about some ice cream and later got an ad for said ice cream.

Well, of fucking course you got an ad for ice cream. It's fucking summer, you will get ads for ice cream in the summer.

[-] VirtualOdour@sh.itjust.works 10 points 7 months ago

Before caller ID people were SURE they were psychic because 'I was just thinking about them and they phoned'

The reality is the odds of things like that never happening are far more unlikely than it happening occasionally

[-] richardisaguy@lemmy.world 9 points 7 months ago

I bet using an adblock would make it much more difficult for your phone to call home. Try adaway

[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

I have whole house ad blocking with a pihole and its enforced with pfsense. All DNS traffic gets NATed to pihole.

[-] anonymouse@lemmings.world 8 points 7 months ago

How are you seeing ads at all, then?

[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

It was a suggested article not an ad

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] archy@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago

I don't see on the provided screenshot any apps that shouldn't have the mic access. You can certainly deny it and break some apps functionality but you'll be "safe from ads"

[-] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago

did you or some of the people in your inner circle google whatever you talked about? that is also another way it would have come up in your ads.

[-] grayman@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago

Or watch it on YouTube. Or look at it on Facebook. Or whatever.

[-] chokidar@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Just get a Pixel and flash GrapheneOS.

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 5 points 7 months ago

I didn't know there was a such thing as FUTO Voice Input. It's really good. Shame the "Open" nature of Google Android was rejected by Google Keyboard and other Google things...

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 4 points 7 months ago

Were both of you connected to the same network at the time you had the conversation? It’s possible your coworker had a lot of search/browsing history of what you were talking about and whoever is pushing the ads figured out you’re likely related to them by way of location/vicinity. I don’t think android is actively listening to your every conversation.

[-] PublicLewdness@lemmy.ml 4 points 7 months ago

I've never had this happen to me but I am always on a a Degoogled version of Android such as GrapheneOS, DivestOS or /e/ OS.

[-] leanleft@lemmy.ml 3 points 7 months ago

pinephone has hardware killswitch. but that cant protect you from other devices like other ppl phones.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2024
114 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31652 readers
513 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS