473
submitted 8 months ago by MicroWave@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 114 points 8 months ago

This whole thing was a stunt to test public response. Had we not said anything they would have implemented it. I won't hear otherwise.

[-] NABDad@lemmy.world 12 points 8 months ago

The only way to stop it would be for Wendy's to go bankrupt as a result of their little test.

Unfortunately, that won't happen because the sociopaths in charge of our lives are right. People are stupid.

[-] Asafum@feddit.nl 3 points 8 months ago

If anything the lesson they learned is to not announce anything and to just do it hoping people don't catch on. I don't think enough people buy fast food so regularly that they have the prices memorized. :/

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

I have taco bell memorized, I get Taco Bell a couple times a weak. I get the same fucking thing everytime, I know their price.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

What in politics is called a trial balloon.

[-] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 66 points 8 months ago

I don't think it's intolerance to unstable prices. It's intolerance to higher prices.

If they also dropped the price substantialy when demand was lower, I'd assume many more would be OK with it. Instead this looks like just another trick to raise prices

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 35 points 8 months ago

I don't think it's either of those so much as intolerance to openly price gouging.

Higher prices reduce demand (or at least overall sales). That's basic economics and we have seen a lot of that over the past 3 years.

We've seen scarcity lead to increased prices (see eggs). This also led to reduced sales but not outrage, because most consumers understand how a chicken disease can lead to the loss of huge portions of egg laying chickens and how an event like that can lead to temporary price increases.

Even with Uber surge pricing, while it does indeed piss people off and reduce demand, even those who hate it can at least understand the principle that some of that increase is passed on to the drivers as an incentive to get more drivers to serve areas and times with high demand. You're still seeing the economic function of a price increase, but at least some of it is going toward a measure to mitigate the issue.

But in this case there's no factor that makes a burger at noon cost Wendy's any more than a burger at 3pm. I think that's where the outrage comes from. It's Wendy's basically saying, "We're increasing prices at this time because we like money."

Are they paying employees more at surge times? Is their food more expensive to buy and prepare at those times? Are they increasing staffing for a few hours to ensure that wait times don't increase?

Nah. It's still the same old thing on their end, they've just decided they want more money.

It's intolerance to blatant greed.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

I have news for you: Uber increases prices based on their guesses about how much you'll pay. They have been caught increasing prices for different customers at the same time in the same exact place.

For example:

They read your phone state and battery life. If they know you have 10% battery left, they will raise your price because they know you probably can't wait for another car. If they think you are a woman and you look at rides after midnight and your battery is low, they are going to charge an arm and a leg.

I try to keep my battery charged at 100% when I go out. I also check the price 10 minutes before I need it on both Uber and Lyft. That way they see someone load the app, check a price, and close the app quickly. This looks like a cheap person who they think can be enticed by a low price. They will routinely drop the price because they think I'm considering driving or something.

[-] hydrospanner@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

That sounds more like individual pricing than the "surge pricing" being discussed here (and a both/and situation is very possible).

I almost never use Uber/Lyft so I am not terribly familiar with their business models.

[-] KevonLooney@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

It's both. The "surge pricing" just means everyone has an increase at the same time. They don't even give that to the driver anymore.

Maybe people don't know this: drivers don't necessarily get the extra money. Drivers have known this since they decoupled the customer price from the driver earnings.

They fluctuate the price a passenger sees based on what they think they can get. They do the same per driver, so sometimes they offer a ride to drivers at a really crappy price in case there's a dumb driver who's new or desperate. It's better for drivers to reject that and wait for a better ride.

That's what the app is doing when it's "searching for a driver" for a whole minute even though there are clearly drivers in the area. It's the algorithm trying to scam some driver out of a couple bucks and you pay the price in extra wait time.

[-] darkdemize@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 months ago

Sure, but in that situation, the surge price becomes the new base price, and you wind up with the same thing just reframed as a low demand discount instead of a peak demand increase.

[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

Pretty much the entire US economy has been surge-based pricing since 2021 in that case.

[-] Zipitydew@sh.itjust.works 3 points 8 months ago

Which is what they'll ultimately do later on when this blows over.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 66 points 8 months ago

Just like American consumers stood up to Netflix when they cracked down on password sharing?

[-] Blank@lemmy.world 39 points 8 months ago

I canceled my account.. but yes, sad trombone noises all around.

[-] Raiderkev@lemmy.world 8 points 8 months ago

Tried to get my wife to cancel multiple times. She actually watches their content and "can't go without it". Imo Netflix has been shit aside from standup comedy for like 8 years now.

[-] Brutticus@lemm.ee 8 points 8 months ago

I recommend piracy

[-] Riven@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 8 months ago

I also canceled be cause of their bullshit but I don't agree with your context statement. People have different likes, I personally find they have put up way more content I actually like in the past couple years, so I just pirate it now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HurlingDurling@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

I think part of the intolerance with Wendy's is that it's food. One can live without entertainment, but not without food. There's also the fact that tmobile (and I think verizon) gives its customers access to Netflix with their phone plans

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 12 points 8 months ago

No one needs Wendy’s. A lot of vocal people are annoyed with all this stuff, but I think it’s not their core customers being vocal. I for one stopped going there when their app started allowing me to order, but the restaurant receives a payment failed notice and never makes my food. Been through support multiple times and no one knows anything. Then I tried to relogin and Google login was down for weeks.

[-] lagomorphlecture@lemm.ee 9 points 8 months ago

Wendy's is garbage in terms of health and nutrition but there are a lot of people who probably have much easier access to a Wendy's than a grocery store. That's the reality of life in America for a lot of low income people and it's fairly well divided along race lines as well. We can sit here from our white suburban couches and judge because there are 4 grocery stores within a 10 minute drive but that simply isn't how it works in some areas.

[-] phillaholic@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Sure, but that’s a different problem.

[-] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

You are indeed correct, a food desert will certainly drive customers who have no choice.

[-] whalebiologist@lemmy.world 1 points 8 months ago

I used to think this was the case, but I am not sure anymore, I am trying to piece it together. Yeah it sucks for the 1 in 10 of us that doesn't live near a grocery store, but we could probably save everyone by educating them on how to eat cheap and healthy - it's something you would only figure out if you seek the information yourself, and there is so much noise, doubt, deception, and misunderstandings in nutrition that the corporations must be doing it on purpose.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LodeMike@lemmy.today 4 points 8 months ago

Actually yes.

Subscriptions went up in general but down in the areas where they implemented the change.

[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago

We showed them! 😅😥

[-] SilverCode@lemm.ee 41 points 8 months ago

The whole idea of a franchise is so people can get the same menu at the same quality at the same price no matter where they are. Having dynamic pricing means you can't even be assured of the price at a single location, let alone being in a new city with an unfamiliar restaurant.

If you don't know what you are going to be able to buy with your $5, then might as well go to someplace different.

[-] Jakdracula@lemmy.world 19 points 8 months ago

Um, the whole idea of a franchise is for the owner to make money.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 8 months ago

For the consumer I am pretty sure they meant. There is a lot of surprises and uncertainty but when you go to a place like that you know exactly what you are going to get for the price you expect.

[-] apex32@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

same price no matter where they are

This is not at all true. Here is a map showing Big Mac prices across the US:

https://mccheapest.com

[-] SilverCode@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It is all true in the Country I live in. And the other Countries I have visited.

I guess not all Countries are the same, and forget that people in the US think everyone else is also from the US.

[-] wahming@monyet.cc 8 points 8 months ago

forget that people in the US think everyone else is also from the US.

Says the person who made a sweeping worldwide generalisation

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 25 points 8 months ago
[-] mPony@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

This would send a message not just to Wendy's , but to any other company thinking of "Opportunistic Gouging".

Imagine Starbucks charging more for coffee in the morning Imagine bars charging more for beer during games Imagine gas stations charging more for gasoline after a natural disaster. Actually you don't have to imagine that: many have tried it, and they've gotten massive fucking fines when they do, because Opportunistic Gouging is fucking unacceptable.

Pass Laws, you fools.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 1 points 8 months ago

We would need a functioning legislature to pass laws. We can’t even pass a budget.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] elvith@feddit.de 2 points 8 months ago

I’ve never been to Wendy’s and currently it doesn’t look like I will go there in the foreseeable future

[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

After I paid $4.31 a while back for a large chocolate Frosty, was handed a 12 ouncer, and was assured that it was not a mistake when I insisted that I'd ordered a large, I decided to part ways with Wendy's. Shrinkflation with the Frosty's, hyperinflation with their burgers...fuck 'em. I'll make my own burgers.

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

How many ounces did their large frosty used to be?

[-] radicalautonomy@lemmy.world 4 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It was 20 oz. for a long time, but I feel like I remember a time in the mid 90s when it was 24 oz. And the price has gone up as well, I definitely wasn't paying $4 and tax for a large Frosty back then.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 17 points 8 months ago

The funny thing is, it doesn't even make sense. Wendy's doesn't run out of stock, costumers just wait a little longer. Uber might have limited cars available so """"""it makes some level of sense"""""" (please don't kill me)

Having the kitchen fully staffed and still working 100% is the most profitable situation for them. This is just a"fuck you because we think we can" situation.

[-] Ross_audio@lemmy.world 10 points 8 months ago

Having the kitchen half staffed but spreading the customers out so they still get the same revenue is what they were aiming for.

It's a "fuck you" and "fuck our employees" policy.

[-] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Having the kitchen staffed and working 100% of the time will turn into burnout really fucking quick.

Beancounters need to learn humans are not machines.

[-] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Not 100% of the time, but working at 100% capacity during the rush hour.

I worked in a McDonald's, and 1-2 hours working at full capacity was very manageable. It's much worse when it's not very busy but it's extremely understaffed.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 11 points 8 months ago

If the poor assholes working get surge wages during the rush I'll go along with it

[-] mods_are_assholes@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

hahahahaha not under our current corporatocracy!

[-] SkyeHarith@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Corruptocracy

[-] Teon@kbin.social 6 points 8 months ago

My decision to no longer eat at Wendys 2 decades ago has certainly paid off.
Please activate the surge pricing Dave!!

[-] books@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Plus with surge pricing at Wendy's I assume there is still a floor for prices, right? Like at 3pm it's probably still the normal/regular menu price and not some crazy firesale of 99 cent meals

[-] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

If Wendy's hadn't announced/advertised their new variable pricing strategy, fewer people would've noticed, And there wouldn't be this backlash.

People don't really notice fast food prices until theyve already paid and sometimes they still don't even notice until much later In retrospect.

[-] scaredoftrumpwinning@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Wendy's was the first to try market price for fast food. I've heard of market price for lobster but never for crappy food.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 01 Mar 2024
473 points (100.0% liked)

News

23301 readers
2803 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS