1365
u mad, state? (lemmy.world)
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nikscha@feddit.de 123 points 1 year ago

Everytime someone says they don't have anything to hide I ask them what the pin of their phone is and to give me their phone. Suddenly that's something different...

[-] Charger8232@lemmy.ml 82 points 1 year ago

I once asked a friend if he trusted the lock on his phone (brand new iPhone 15 Pro Max, latest and greatest). He told me he did. I asked him if I could use his phone while it was locked, and he told me "No, I don't trust you. You would probably hack it or something." That statement says two things:

  1. He only cares about attacks on privacy on a personal level, which is the mental flaw lots of people have.

  2. He doesn't actually trust the lock on his phone, but refuses to admit it.

By the way, here's a few fun gimmicks you can pull on iPhone users:

  1. See if you can swipe left to view widgets on the lock screen. I was able to get someone's address this way. He told me the whole time "There's nothing you can find there." and then afterwards said "Ah, crap."

  2. If there is a lock screen mini widget (under the time) for a clock or related feature, tap on it and it will open the clock app. You can also get there if you can swipe down to access control center if the "timer" button is enabled there. You can then make it look like you unlocked their phone, and start reading off their alarm names. This one has freaked out a lot of people.

  3. If they realize how you got there and try disabling control center access on the lock screen (as they should, FaceID is fast enough people!), you can see if you can access Siri and say "View my alarms".

[-] Eggyhead@kbin.social 44 points 1 year ago

I can see why your friend would assume you could hack their phone based on how specific these steps are.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 30 points 1 year ago

Me: graphene phone with notifications hidden until unlocked. No voice assistant whatsoever. I guess the only thing you can do is take pictures from lock screen but that's not really useful. It doesn't show gallery of previous photos.

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago

Even default android has such settings. I can view what song I'm listening to, take new photos and theoretically take short notes(haven't figured out how it works) and that's it. Also since I disabled the Google assistant, they can't do anything with it too.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Ah that's cool. Had no idea you could disable google assistant without doing some weird stuff with your phone.

[-] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

I disabled the speech detection and the button underneath my volume control. If I tap my home button for to long it still activates, but I don't use it.

[-] storcholus@feddit.de 27 points 1 year ago

There is a difference between having nothing to hide and not closing the door when talking a shit

[-] nikscha@feddit.de 29 points 1 year ago

What I'm hearing is that people have an inert desire for privacy, EVEN if they don't have anything to hide (what are you hiding in the toilet?) I don't see why that wouldn't extend into the digital realm....

[-] Gabu@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

And what is it?

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

A right to privacy? Not in my country, thank you very much.

The government has every right to watch you take a shit and if you don't acknowledge that then you must be conspiring to deprive us of our freedoms.

[-] nolight@lemm.ee 82 points 1 year ago

Say whatever you want, Snowden's a fucking hero for sharing this.

[-] n3m37h@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 year ago

Don't forget the people that tried to blow the whistle on the NSA prior to Snowden

[-] Sims@lemmy.ml 63 points 1 year ago

A 'State' is not inherently bad. That's just libertarian propaganda/dogma. Self-interested psychopaths in charge of a state is bad..

[-] 9point6@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

Funny thing about ancap libertarianism is that they've correctly identified that power can lead to tyranny, but they're completely oblivious to the power that corporatism (the conclusion of lassez-faire capitalism) results in.

[-] InternetCitizen2@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

They often are Christians, so they apply fundamentalist style thinking and cannot challenge the assumptions they made.

[-] TengoDosVacas@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

tHe mArKeT wIlL rEgUlAtE tHeM

[-] djehuti@programming.dev 28 points 1 year ago

States always wind up being run by self-interested psychopaths.

That's not a "flaw;" it's the fundamental nature of the concept.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago

We need a strong authoritarian leader and a massive police force to keep the people in line.

[-] qaz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] LWD@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

deleted by creator

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] delirious_owl@discuss.online 15 points 1 year ago

Lol lots of people think that no entity has the right to monopolize violence against a population.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately it's usually self-interested psychopaths who seek out and obtain those positions, especially since you need to be a bit psychotic to do what's required to get there.

[-] winterayars@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 year ago

The state is kinda bad and it's not only Right-Libertarians who say that. Even so, leaking documents is not always bad. Like, the Abu Ghraib leak was objectively good.

[-] Maggoty@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Abu Graib wasn't leaked. Amnesty International talked to prisoners that were released. Then the Red Cross used their oversight powers to get in and make an official report. Then a soldier reported the crimes to the Army's version of the FBI, (CID). The Army then did an investigation and started arresting people.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 year ago

Oh boy, here comes the political drama. Can we not do this?

[-] phreekno@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Man I really do enjoy reading the classifieds

[-] Wahots@pawb.social 30 points 1 year ago

This argument of "nothing to hide" always reminds me of Google, show me this man's balls, please by Eric Andre.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

Google, show me this man's balls, please

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] far_university1990@feddit.de 29 points 1 year ago

Warthunder forum be like

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Putin Alert! Putin Alert! This guy supports Vladimir Putin! He is undermining the US so that the Russians can invade! Also, the Chinese! Also the... uh... Cubans? Venezuelans? Quebecians? Idk, but its bad! They're coming to take your freedom! Protect the NSA! PROTECT THE NSA! THEY STAND BETWEEN YOU AND TYRANNY!

[-] fahfahfahfah@lemmy.billiam.net 13 points 1 year ago

Inb4 some Quebec person comes in and complains about “Quebecians”

[-] vikingqueef@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Phonecians are from phoenix.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] wildbus8979@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

I'll allow it, in fact here in Quebecistan we call Cuba comrades. Always have. One of our favorite vacation destination too.

[-] andreas@lemmy.korfmann.xyz 6 points 1 year ago
[-] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

Canadian bacon!

[-] jerrythegenius@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

*grabs popcorn*

[-] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

Nothing to hide...

It's the same reason I don't support free speach: I've got nothing to say.

/s

[-] battleshack@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

BUT BUT BUT THOSE ARE ILLEGAL TO SHARE

[-] pewgar_seemsimandroid 2 points 1 year ago

but come on this tank in war thunder is Impossible to beat with my bob semple tank

[-] Licksrocks@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Bruh it's the government. They have plenty of things to hide.

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I mean...the state does have legitimate things to hide beyond their spying programs. Not every person that spills government secrets is as careful as Snowden.

[-] 0nekoneko7@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

played well.

[-] Endward23@futurology.today 4 points 1 year ago

Sorry, but the cases are too different. The secrets of the government serve a completely different purpose than those of the citizens.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Or so you are told by people unwilling to be under strict oversight from independent authorities.

"I do this for good reasons, trust me" is not a valid argument.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Allero@lemmy.today 3 points 1 year ago

Government always tries to establish as much power imbalance as possible

[-] GrappleHat@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Memes r duamb

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
1365 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

40515 readers
301 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS