201
submitted 6 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

Pretty clear attempt to intimidate those who support any kind of reproductive health services being permitted

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 109 points 6 months ago

Should just call it what it is. Domestic terrorism.

[-] match@pawb.social 30 points 6 months ago

That's weird, it's not a Planned Parenthood

[-] Sanctus@lemmy.world 67 points 6 months ago

Religious extremism needs to be addresses in this country. Your right to what is God's image may extend no further than your two brain cells. The revolutionaries who started this country shot the people who forced God into government. Now we've got idle "peace keepers" encouraging shit like this in their free time. The country is lost if leftists don't save it now.

[-] DeadWorld@lemm.ee 42 points 6 months ago

This is obvious teligious terrorism and i want organisation's sanctioned for coperating with them, just like they would for Isis

[-] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 58 points 6 months ago

It seems like jumping to conclusions to assume this was an anti-abortion terrorist when nearly everyone probably has a reason to loathe the Alabama AG. His own wife and kids probably hate him.

Remember when Rand Paul got attacked and people assumed it was political? Then we found out he just took an ass whooping from an old man mad about lawn care.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 26 points 6 months ago

Its definitely not 100% certain, but reasonably likely given which groups have a recent history of using bombs and the fact that his recent stance is the kind of thing which gets their attention.

[-] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 16 points 6 months ago

It doesn’t matter to me whether it is the right or left, explosives should not be the way to handle the dispute. If it lands someone in jail that I would otherwise agree with I would say it’s fair based on the poor judgment exercised by the culprits.

[-] Silverseren@kbin.social 26 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

This is why conservatives should stop stoking rage politics. Because it puts them in a position where they can't immediately tell which side is trying to kill them. Because it could be anyone for a plethora of potential reasons.

[-] TK420@lemmy.world 9 points 6 months ago

Sounds like Alabama is giving Mississippi a run for its money in the stupid department and those stupid constituents are being typical southerners: stupid fucking idiots.

Lock these assholes up and prosecute!

[-] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago

Well gosh, the AG did not INTEND to prosecute me for murder even though they could in an instant and it would be legally correct. That's such a relief. /S

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago

I'm not a conspiracy theorist, however... No one hurt, no buildings damaged? Don't want to say false flag... but it's really not hard to put a bomb in a place to at least cause damage. This sounds like what would happen if someone on his staff did it to create a fake narrative. No one actually in danger and you can blame it on whoever you want, left or right in this case, depending on how the wind is blowing.

this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
201 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18870 readers
3378 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS