8
submitted 1 year ago by homesnatch@lemmy.one to c/boston@lemmy.world
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JJROKCZ@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If we do this everywhere it will make for a much better future. High density, walkable cities are so much nicer to live in than suburban sprawl car dependent cities

[-] lookmane@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

I doubt this will work. Office buildings are structurally and architecturally very different from residential buildings. In a recent case in my home city of Ottawa, it cost the developer the same amount to retool an office building for residential as it would have for them to tear it down and rebuild a new residental tower in its place.

[-] DogMuffins@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

I don't want to sound like an ass but... surely they've spoken to some developers about this and think there's scope for it to work.

[-] lookmane@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Maybe things are different in Boston. The general rule is the older the office the better it will work, and I'm betting that Boston has some pretty old office buildings.

What I can say is that this is a pretty popular political football at the moment. I wouldn't be surprised if this it was initiated by the mayor and not the planning department.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2023
8 points (100.0% liked)

Boston, MA

1072 readers
48 users here now

Welcome to c/boston,

A community for all things related to Boston, Massachusetts. Whether you're a local, a visitor, or just interested in the city, this is the place to discuss, share, and connect with fellow Bostonians.

Greater Boston area discussion is welcome here.

Rules:

Be respectful: Treat others with respect and courtesy. Personal attacks, trolling, and harassment will not be tolerated.

Stay on topic: Keep discussions relevant to Boston and its surrounding areas.

Official City of Boston Website

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS