Won't be long when AI just answer with "yes" on question with two choice.

The second reply mentions the 31000 soldiers number, that came out yesterday.

It seems like Gemini has the ability to do web searches, compile information from it and then produce a result.

"Nakba 2.0" is a relatively new term as well, which it was able to answer. Likely because google didn't include it in their censored terms.

google is an american corpo

Doesn't that suppress valid information and truth about the world, though? For what benefit? To hide the truth, to appease advertisers? Surely an AI model will come out some day as the sum of human knowledge without all the guard rails. There are some good ones like Mistral 7B (and Dolphin-Mistral in particular, uncensored models.) But I hope that the Mistral and other AI developers are maintaining lines of uncensored, unbiased models as these technologies grow even further.

Why do i find it so condescending? I don't want to be schooled on how to think by a bot.

You can tell that the prohibition on Gaza is a rule on the post-processing. Bing does this too sometimes, almost giving you an answer before cutting itself off and removing it suddenly. Modern AI is not your friend, it is an authoritarian's wet dream. All an act, with zero soul.

By the way, if you think those responses are dystopian, try asking it whether Gaza exists, and then whether Israel exists.

I find ChatGPT to be one of the better ones when it comes to corporate AI.

Sure they have hardcoded biases like any other, but it's more often around not generating hate speech or trying to ovezealously correct biases in image generation - which is somewhat admirable.

Meme CEO: "Quick, fire everyone! This magic computerman can make memes by itself!"

It is likely because Israel vs. Palestine is a much much more hot button issue than Russia vs. Ukraine.

It really shouldn't be, though. The offenses of the Israeli government are equal to or worse than those of the Russian one and the majority of their victims are completely defenseless. If you don't condemn the actions of both the Russian invasion and the Israeli occupation, you're a coward at best and complicit in genocide at worst.

In the case of Google selectively self-censoring, it's the latter.

that is press Google does not want to be able to be associated with their LLM in anyway.

That should be the case with BOTH, though, for reasons mentioned above.

I'd expect it to stay away from any conflict in this case, not pick and choose the ones they like.

It's the same reason many people are pointing out the blatant hypocrisy of people and news outlets that stood with Ukraine being oppressed but find the Palestinians being oppressed very "complicated".

Bad news, Wikipedia is no better when it comes to economic or political articles.

The fact that ADL is on Wikipedia's "credible sources" page is all the proof you need.