204

Sultan: Girl Scouts threaten legal action over troop's fundraiser for children in Gaza (www.stltoday.com)

submitted 10 months ago by stopthatgirl7@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

25 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Girl Scouts of Eastern Missouri sent an email and said members could not raise money that represents “partisan politics” and must “stay neutral.”

all 29 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The oppressor determines which things are and are not "political." The ideology and politics of the oppressor is always viewed as "neutral," while the oppressed, pointing out their oppression, are "being political."

The oppressor maintains power by controlling language and expression, by denying the oppressed even the right to talk about their own oppression as it is "impolite." In the rare cases the oppressed is allowed to talk, the oppressor demands inclusion in the conversation to "make sure both sides are heard." The two sides being that of the oppressed asking for their oppression to stop, and the oppressor justifying the continuation of said oppression while criticizing the oppressed for "not being willing to compromise" on "some oppression" or "some genocide" but the oppressed making the "unreasonable" demand of "no oppression" or "no genocide."

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

This is excellent. Is it from something?

[-] hex_m_hell@slrpnk.net 6 points 10 months ago

I'm probably paraphrasing someone.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Elie Wiesel said something similar.

https://www.ipl.org/essay/Essay-On-Neutrality-PCBW3QTTU#:~:text=The%20statement%20by%20Elie%20Wiesel,protect%20themselves%20and%20their%20people.

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 45 points 10 months ago

I have to admit, my gut reaction was to ponder if this rule would be enforced if it was to raise money for Israeli children instead… but I know diddly squat about Girl Scouts and did about 5 minutes of research.

What I learned was that money raised by Girl Scouts is intended to be spent on local community projects. So helping local kids would be cool, but not foreign. Girl Scouts doesn’t forbid one from aiding foreign needy, but you can’t do that under the Girl Scout banner/as a Girl Scout project.

So, at the moment, I’m inclined to side with Girl Scouts on this issue. But, again, I don’t know squat about how Girl Scouts is run in practice, and if this project is being singled out or not.

[-] WHARRGARBL@kbin.social 13 points 10 months ago

I was troop leader for GSUSA, and you called it. The organization is very protective of its image, in order to be open to kids from ALL cultures. The rules regarding political activities under the Girl Scouts banner are clearly stated, and if there are any questions or requests for an exception, the staff is always willing to help.

This troop could have simply cleared the plan in advance, or participated in political, humanitarian fundraisers without involving the organization. The fact that the leader decided to break the rules, take offense, disband, and publicly infer that the Girl Scouts values are questionable says a lot about who has what agenda.

[-] Wooster@startrek.website 6 points 10 months ago

I appreciate this level-headed take from someone knowledgeable on the topic. It's very easy to get riled up over the issue in Gaza, and it's important to discern where certain actions are sanctioned or not.

That said, I suspect there were better ways to deescalate the issue on Girl Scouts' end. Threatening litigation over a contentious humanitarian issue is begging for bad publicity. But, I'm not privy to the exchanges that brought it to that level.

[-] Tedrow@lemmy.world 39 points 10 months ago

My daughter is a girl scout and as far as I'm aware they can choose to spend money raised on activities for their own troop or any cause / non profit that they wish. I think the Girl Scouts of Eastern Missouri may be mistaken here.

Unrelated topic, the Girl Scouts allows trans girls to participate. I wonder if they have the same stance or if this local branch is going against the international standard.

[-] beardown@lemm.ee 5 points 10 months ago

Supporting Israel's victims is drastically more disruptive to establishment power than supporting trans children.

Consequently, It's more likely for an organization to prevent its members from supporting Gazans than it is for an organization to prevent its members from supporting trans rights

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Gonna put my sister in Boy Scouts cause they allow girls in there since a few years ago now. I wonder if they have any restrictions on foreign aid like this.

[-] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Afaik, the US is the only country still calling it "boy" scouts.

Everywhere else that I'm aware of, it's just Scouts. And it has been co-ed for at least a couple of decades outside of the US.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago

Yeah I like saying Scouts more than boy scouts. It's more inclusive that way.

[-] flipht@kbin.social 3 points 10 months ago

Girl scouts may be wrong here, but they're still by far a better organization than the boy scouts.

There's something to be said for the skills that are taught and the overall purported ethos, but like the Catholic church, you absolutely cannot trust them to not cover up heinous shit that they'll allow to continue forever.

If you do, make sure you're present all the time and be aware that predators have found a home there since their inception.

[-] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Boy scout troops vary from place to place. I've been with my troop for many years and we're great. The next city over, I know a troop that runs things very differently and left. So ymmv

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 31 points 10 months ago

partisan politics

Huh. Which US political party represents not doing genocides? Kinda seems like both of them are on board with the genocide thing so I don't see how this is partisan.

[-] blazera@kbin.social 11 points 10 months ago

The political party of palestinian children

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Damn it Mom, I'm never going to earn this genocide badge If we keep doing these protests.

[-] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 9 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

“Unfortunately, if this direct violation of the organization’s governing documents and policies continues, Girl Scouts of Eastern Missouri and Girl Scouts of the United States have no other choice than to engage our legal counsel to help remedy this situation and to protect the intellectual property and other rights of the organization.”

Politics is violence.

[-] ef9357@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 10 months ago

I don’t eat GS cookies because of the ingredient list, but I’ve always donated money. Now I’m tempted to keep my money due to this heavy handed reaction.

[+] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 7 points 10 months ago

[deleted]

[-] WHARRGARBL@kbin.social 10 points 10 months ago

It is the position of the national organization. People here are going on about how a troop was allowed to raise funds for Ukraine, without reading the part that states how that troop asked in advance for an exception to the rules and took the required steps to do it.

[+] CaptObvious@literature.cafe 14 points 10 months ago

[deleted]

[-] flipht@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

This. The "just go through the steps!" people are ignoring that one of the steps is approval, which can and will be denied if it would cost them more than they could expect to recoup.

[-] WHARRGARBL@kbin.social 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The “just go through the steps” people is me - the solitary commenter who has declared direct and extensive experience within the organization. You’re correct that one of the steps is approval, yet the woman in this instance never requested approval. What is wrong with requesting approval for an exception from an organization that isn’t yours? Everyone else requests approval, just like we all would if we wanted an exception at work, because we don’t own the company.

It boggles my mind that almost every commenter here is certain that there would never have been approval because GSUSA is Zionist, Girl Scouts is made up of donors who are largely Jewish, GSUSA is genocidal and would lose money by granting approval to the nonexistent request. This is all emotion and vile conjecture. Where are the facts to support such accusations?

Why don’t the rules apply to this one individual. I led many activities that had to be cleared, and because I don’t own the Girl Scouts, because I’m not in charge of the organization, I never thought “Oh, those rules aren’t meant for me”. I simply made the requests and provided details as needed. Then my request was approved almost every time. Somehow, this one person is the only one who is above that? And this means the Girl Scouts are racist? What a massive, crazy leap!

[-] FiskFisk33@startrek.website 3 points 10 months ago

What does this have to do with a sultan?

[-] Flumpkin@slrpnk.net 4 points 10 months ago

Huh, wondered the same thing. Apparently written by Aisha Sultan.

this post was submitted on 22 Feb 2024

204 points (100.0% liked)

News

23627 readers

3407 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

Tenthrow@lemmy.world

JonsJava@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world