442
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Hyperreality@kbin.social 99 points 1 year ago

I strongly suspect Discovery was written and acted by people who have never seen actual shit or suffered trauma.

If they had, perhaps they would realise that people who've been through a lot are often the (seemingly) calmest or least emotional person in the room when shit hits the fan. It isn't their first rodeo. Or they're bitter and angry arseholes. Basically Jean Luc Picard or Liam Shaw are far more realistic portrayals of people who have gone through shit.

[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

ADHD helps.

"I have experienced this moment 44 times in my head."

"Oh this argument? I was up late three nights in a row running through every possible iteration."

"Dude! Why were you so calm last night? That was a huge fire and you just sort of calmly grabbed your drink and bag and walked out the door. I saw it!

"I have experienced that moment more times than you can possibly imagine."

[-] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Discovery always struck me as a sci-fi show written by the same people who wrote Gilmore Girls, General Hospital, Greys Anatomy or any other dramatic series.

It’s the over the top Drama Trek.

[-] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 72 points 1 year ago

Sisko seems like the type of guy that you invite to a party and he spends the whole evening in your kitchen because the marinara that came with your mozzarella sticks “doesn’t have enough kick to it”

Sisko can and should show up on SNW to help Pike get his jambalaya recipe just right, then vanish without any explanation other than that he needs to get back to his children and wife.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Sisko insists it's important to the future, but really he just can't personally accept the existence of sub-standard jambalaya at any point in history.

Nor should he.

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago

I suddenly have new aspirations, thank you!

[-] Damdy@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Kick should be in italics, then I could hear him saying that.

[-] teft@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

How can you forget Christopher "beep-beep" Pike?

[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Or Carol Freeman?

Edit: it's a lot like Voyager's review, isn't it?

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Review: "Ran by a former male supermodel, doesnt know how to use the replicator and cooks all his food. Sometimes stops speaking in the middle of a sentence and starts beeping."

[-] marcos@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

They didn't have replicators by his time. I remember the TOS Enterprise had lots of pre-cooked meals on cargo, and preferring fresh stuff is perfectly reasonable.

[-] VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

People complaining that replicated food doesn't taste right is even a bit of a running gag on TNG and DS9.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Review: "Didn't say much, was not very encouraging. Would only answer questions with a yes or no."

[-] teft@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Review so cold it could have been written by an andorian.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

"a murder" implies only one

[-] teft@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Not if it's in regards to crows.

[-] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Who besides Tuvix? Not fair to count Lon Suder’s crimes.

[-] Blackout@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Suspiciously the bodycams were off but i've heard the voyager crew was originally twice as large until she ran out of coffee the first time.

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

She likes her coffee the way she likes her men.

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

Ground up and steeped in hot water?

[-] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Covered in bees.

[-] TipRing@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

She did murder the wife of her holographic boyfriend.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] blahsay@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Oh man discovery. It always seemed like it was written by that guy who was crying and screaming for people to leave Brittney alone.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago
[-] blahsay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago

The eyeliner was flowing.

.... Or was it guyliner?

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I uh, looked it up, and I see why there was confusion. She's Trans

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

Is she really?

I actually didn't know. The difference seemed trivial to me, and it still does. It really doesn't change their message or anything.

It never bothered me at all, nevermind bothering me enough to dig into information about them to figure it out; regardless, that's a nice thing to know in the situation.

I hope she's doing well.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, usually when theres two names in wikipedia its because they transitioned from one to the other, to me she looks like her identified gender, but I guess I can see why others didnt. I just double checked with a quick google search, it wasnt an intense investigation

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

I can see why people cared. That's just not me.

I don't really think people's curiosity is just cause to violate her privacy. It's entirely up to her to decide to share that information or not.

I don't understand people's fascination with it. I'm fairly indifferent about people's genders or sexual preferences in general. You make the choice that suits you best, I'll do the same for me. If you want to be called he/she/they/whatever, then fine, that's cool. I'll do my best to respect your wish to be referred to by a particular title/pronoun. It makes no difference to me.

I'm also pretty indifferent about how people refer to me. Call me sir, miss, he, she, they, them, "hey you".... I don't honestly care. I'm fine with gender normative terms and that's what I tell people that I "prefer" but honestly, I could not care any less. I usually avoid gendered terms as much as I can when I'm in someone's presence; I'm also bad with names, so I usually just use personal direct pronouns such as "you". I try my best to side step the whole issue because it's trivial in my mind. I won't fault someone for caring about it, the same way I don't care if someone gets my name wrong, or says it differently. I don't care enough to correct them, and I don't care that it's wrong unless they need to enter my legal name into a thing for something, which is when it actually matters, legally, so I'll correct them at that point. The only other correction I'll make is to avoid confusion with coworkers. I work with some people who have similar sounding names to mine, so I'll correct clients and co-workers so that I'm not conflated with them (and I don't take flack for something they did, and they don't take flack for something I've done, etc). Beyond that, I couldn't care less. At the same time, people have gotten angry with me for pronouncing their name slightly wrong, so I know people are out there with very strong opinions on it.

Maybe I'm weird. Who knows. There's just so many more important things in the world than what people call me that I'm just consistently unbothered by people getting it wrong.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

All I did was look at "leave Brittany alone" on google and then click wikipedia. Everything I shared here is public info and thus I didnt invade anyones privacy? This comment chain has been fairly low importance/care, I dont think any of here care about her gender all that much more than you do. The last few comments where just about the awkward nature of potentially misgendering someone by accident

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I agree, this chain has mostly been about the awkward parts of it. I didn't mean to imply you invaded her privacy, someone may have in the pursuit of the information, but I certainly didn't mean to imply that was you.

Regardless, whether her privacy was invaded or not, the information is now out there about her, and that is what I had assumed you were referring to. The misunderstanding stems from my comments; specifically that when such a question is raised, some may seek that information quite enthusiastically, even if obtaining it means that you're invading their privacy. I don't know if that's what occurred, but the fervent pursuit of relatively trivial information, damaging someone's right to privacy in the process is questionable at best. I'm just trying to make a comment on the ethics and morals of those that desire information for no better reason than to have it about someone they don't even know.

I would rather not think that people would simply disregard her rights just to have a trivial question answered, but I don't have that much faith in humanity.

I'm certain you're fine and you've done nothing wrong in this instance. I apologize if my words implied any differently. That was not my intention.

I hope you have a wonderful day.

[-] Kedly@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Thats fair enough and a valid point! I do have a tendency to use the internet to double check facts, but in cases such that it might intrude on privacy, I try to keep it to a basic search so that I can minimize that risk. In this case it was just confusion on the presenting gender of a person from a meme, and so I double checked if I was the one in the wrong, turns out I was right in a way I wasnt expecting. I hope you have a pleasant day as well!

[-] blahsay@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Well still the attitude seems like a discovery writer...if I changed my position that would be bad right?

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago

Can we talk about the kids that Janeway had with Paris, that they just abandoned on some distant planet?

[-] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Say what now? Have I purged this episode from my mind?

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Dna altering future reptiles

[-] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Ohh yes that does ring a bell

[-] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

2x15 "Threshold"

[-] Damdy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if Sharn had called Sisko black skin he would have punched him so hard that Weyoun would have felt it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] TotallyNotSpez@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Team Archer right here! ^^

[-] Magnetar@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

Hey, a new planet. Maybe I can lick it?

[-] Klanky@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 year ago

So while not loving Discovery, it’s not so much the crying that got me, I just always feel like I’m watching therapy…innnn spaaaace. It just isn’t very interesting to me personally. I still found it enjoyable enough though.

[-] BigilusDickilus@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

I could sort of deal with that. I just didn't like how focused it was on Michael Burnham and how she is the most important person in the universe. Star Trek is supposed to be an ensemble show, and I would dare say that it shouldn't really have a main character with the understanding that the captain gets more focus generally. It also felt like the writers didn't really like Star Trek that much and there was a lot of stuff that didn't make sense if you poked at it.

[-] Just_Pizza_Crust@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I'd strongly argue against that last part considering Brian Fuller wrote for DS9 and was producer and writer for most of Voyager. Kurzman is also writer and producer for Picard and SNW.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

Nothing about the fancy espresso bar #3 offers to all employees (all employees but her excepted)?

[-] laverabe@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I relate to Janeway the most. Like no coffee? Please cease talking until coffee... ...need coffee.

I mean you're 70000 light-years from Earth, it's ok to have some vices.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2024
442 points (100.0% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

4907 readers
655 users here now

/c/TenForward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!theorville@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS