83
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 19 points 9 months ago

I swear Biden acts more and more like trump every fucking day.

It's like Brewster's millions or some shit, he's going to fuck around, depress turnout, and hand trump the election again.

And there's not a damn thing we can do about it because the DNC made their choice

[-] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 18 points 9 months ago

biden, the dnc are conservatives. they are the conservative party of today.

we have fascists, conservatives, and progressives. the progressives are kept back in a little closet to keep them from making to much noise.

[-] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 14 points 9 months ago

Progressives get pulled out of the closet every election season to get fucked up over how they either potentially sabotaged the Democrats or actually did, regardless that's it always false.

[-] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 6 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I'd actually say the blame rests with the Democrats in power as a whole (and extends from our broken electoral system). The DNC is still running primaries, it's just that the only challengers are no names so there's no debates and no real chance of an alternative. Big name progressives (or even normie Dems who don't believe in performative cruelty at the border) are all too scared that saying Biden is bad in any way might make Trump win. The Republicans tried to run a primary where no one criticized the presumptive nominee, and surprise surprise, it's hard to make a case as to why you should be chosen instead without saying the alternative is bad in some way.

I sure wish we could have a parliamentary system so you could vote "lefter than triangulating centrist" without it being more likely to give power to fascists than just knuckling under. Turns out a bunch of young revolutionaries in the 18th century didn't actually develop a flawless system right out of the box.

[-] agitatedpotato@lemmy.world 6 points 9 months ago

Democrats will always find the political capital to enact right wing solutions, even when the entirety of Republicans block them. This country is beyond fucked, hes gonna make the border crueler to immigrants before he even tries to resolve the dispute between Texas and the federal government.

[-] felixthecat@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago

Seriously, why bother with executive action? I thought the point was to use that as a bargaining chip for getting Ukraine funding. Now that it's dead because Republicans are now opposing their own bill, why bother?

The only border crisis is the one Abbott is creating between Texas and the United States.

[-] SGGeorwell@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago

If I’m allowed to control who enters my home, then why isn’t a sovereign nation similarly able?

[-] chillhelm@lemmy.world 18 points 9 months ago

Because a Nation (and I know this sounds crazy) is not a person. You can do many things a country can't and vice versa.

For example, you can make a rule that in your house black people do not get sweet foods. It's a dick move but not illegal. A country is not allowed to make a law that says black people can't eat sweet foods, because that would be racist discrimination (which is illegal for the government to do in most countries).

Another example: You can poop (like you did when posting that question). A country does not have a digestive tract and in fact does not eat and can therefore not poop.

[-] trevor 12 points 9 months ago

Did you know that nations aren't a house and aren't analogous at all?

International and US law dictate that if you go to the US and make an asylum claim, you are there legally, by definition, until your case is heard. Trying to keep them out or deport them is in direct violation of those laws, purely for the sake of appealing to racist dipshits that have bought into the fear mongering about the border.

If the US government (all governments, really) would simply put resources into processing those claims and making real pathways to citizenship, rather than brutalizing them for being born on the other side of a border and being brown, this "problem" could have been solved long ago.

[-] Dadifer@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

It doesn't help that 99% of Americans are immigrants or the descendants of immigrants.

[-] Schadrach@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 9 months ago

International and US law dictate that if you go to the US and make an asylum claim, you are there legally, by definition, until your case is heard.

And if you sneak across the border wherever you can manage and only make an asylum claim if/when caught...? Like, surely, there has to be an argument that you have to present yourself at the border and make such a claim for it to be valid? But then most illegal immigrants in the US are people who've received temporary visas and then just not left when it expired.

[-] iain@feddit.nl 7 points 9 months ago

Why would this analogy hold? Why can nations control who comes in and not cities, counties, or any other set of borders we've come up with?

On top of that, the US doesn't seem to respect other borders as much either, when it sends troops to whatever place, usually without getting invited.

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

Can you give me the number of the agent that sold the US to Joe Biden?

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 2 points 9 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The unilateral measures under consideration might upset some progressives in Congress, the officials said, but they noted that Democratic mayors who have asked for more help from the federal government to handle the influx of migrants in their cities would be pleased.

On Wednesday, Senate Republicans blocked a bipartisan border bill that they had negotiated with Democrats and the Biden administration over the preceding months.

“Today, Congressional Republicans chose to put partisan politics ahead of our national security and voted against what border agents have said they need.

On Tuesday, President Joe Biden argued the bipartisan bill would have “made important fixes to our broken immigration system,” calling it “the toughest, fairest law” on the border ever proposed.

He plans to cite the Republican turnabout on the bipartisan border legislation as proof that for political reasons the GOP does not really want to solve the problem.

But he is still vulnerable on the issue, trailing his likely 2024 opponent, former President Donald Trump, by more than 30 points on securing the border and controlling immigration, according to a new NBC News poll released this week.


The original article contains 518 words, the summary contains 184 words. Saved 64%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
83 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19097 readers
4261 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS