192
Is jellyfish vegan? (lemmy.world)

They don’t have a brain really and kinda just float there. Do they even feel pain?

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] robotdna@lemmy.world 70 points 1 year ago

After having kept jellyfish as pets (Atlantic bay nettles), I wouldn't really consider them to be vegetarian nor vegan. While similar to plants, seemed to have a greater sense of environmental awareness than my plants. Mine could sense light, have "off days", and interact with their environment. It's probably true that there's not much going on there due to the small amount of nerves that control everything, but even when mine would accidentally get caught on tank cleaning tools or get bumped around they'd react in a protective way and to me it's just similar enough to animalistic behavior that I'd not feel comfortable consuming them if I were vegan.

[-] _finger_@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

Don’t most plants sense light and interact with their environment?

Tardigrades have been observed reacting defensively to danger, even offensively. I know they’re not plants, but do they feel pain? What about brine shrimp?

Jellyfish are super weird because they really blur the lines between plant/animal. It’s a really interesting question to ask honestly.

[-] simplecyphers@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

So is this theory of veganism to not cause pain to an animal? If so what about ethically sourced meat. Like bullet to the head/decapitation. Most of those creatures feel nothing, they just end.

Or is it to not eat anything that comes from the an organism from the Animalia kingdom because harming animals is immoral?

After proofreading, these sound more aggressive/argumentative than i had intended but they get the point across.

[-] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 22 points 1 year ago

Veganism means to reduce the suffering and exploitation of animals as much as practically possible.

There is nothing ethical about killing a living being that doesn't want to die.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] FlightyPenguin@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

Jellyfish eat animals and animal byproducts, so no, they are not vegan.

Jokes aside, often vegans follow dietary restrictions for reasons other than an ethical or moral belief against causing pain. Many vegans don't even eat honey, so I imagine jellyfish is pretty safely in non-vegan territory.

[-] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

Are carnivores plants vegan? Genuinely curious, never looked into it.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] protist@mander.xyz 37 points 1 year ago

No Brain? For Jellyfish, No Problem

“I think sometimes people use its lack of a brain to treat a jellyfish in ways we wouldn’t treat another animal,” Helm says. “There are robots in South Korea that drag around the bay and suck in jellyfish and shred them alive. I’m a biologist and sometimes sacrifice animals, but I try to be humane about it. We don’t know what they are feeling, but they certainly have aversion to things that cause them harm; try to snip a tentacle and they will swim away very vigorously. Sure, they don’t have brains, but I don’t think that is an excuse to put them through a blender.”

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] pinwurm@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

It depends on the definition of Veganism.

There’s is a popular school of thought that the diet‘s sole purpose to reduce suffering. If a living thing has no central nervous system (or brain), it has no thoughts and cannot experience pain or harm. It’s not much different than a fruit or vegetable. I know vegans that make exceptions for oysters - for example.

Others schools of thought are about avoiding animal products altogether, it doesn’t matter if it suffers or not - there’s no way to know. Therefore, it’s immoral to eat them if you can knowingly choose an alternative.

[-] Tywele@lemmy.dbzer0.com 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Veganism is not only a diet. It's an ethical stance and lifestyle.

Edit: clarifications

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Chickenstalker@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

I believe that it is not, since scientifically it is an animal. However, some vegetarians (not vegans) will eat fish or certain animal products.

[-] csm10495@sh.itjust.works 47 points 1 year ago

I thought that people who would eat fish but not other animals were pescatarians.

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] vsg@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

They are animals, so no.

[-] raltoid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

They're animals, so no.

[-] Arotrios@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Nope. Animal product. Would be ok for pescatarians, however.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Archpawn@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

By a strict definition, no. But most vegans don't really care about scientific classification. Personally I don't think they're sentient and think it's fine.

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] fubo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I've known people who chose not to eat mammals, birds, fish, decapods (lobsters, crabs, prawns), or cephalopod mollusks (e.g. octopus, squid); but who were okay with eating bivalve mollusks (clams, mussels, oysters) on the grounds that they did not have enough brain to experience pain.

I think those folks would be okay with eating jellyfish.

Rather than asking, "Is X vegan?" it might be more useful to ask, "What is person P trying to accomplish by 'being vegan'? Is eating X in conflict with that?"

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] bi_tux@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Jellyfish belong to Cnidaria, which is a phylum under kingdom Animalia

TLDR: Jellyfish are biologicly animals

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] reality_boy@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Vegan is a very wide array of things ranging to not eating red meat all the way down to not doing anything that could hurt a plant (only scavengering fallen fruit).

https://theminimalistvegan.com/types-of-vegans-and-vegetarians/

[-] DrummyB@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This is not at all what Veganism is.

Veganism is LITERALLY an ethical stance regarding exploiting/harming/killing non-human animals.

Finding a random blog online that states otherwise means nothing. Anyone who ate a salad last Tuesday these days thinks they can simply decide what Veganism is.

THIS is the actual definition of Veganism, directly from the people who coined the term:

“Veganism is a philosophy and way of living which seeks to exclude—as far as is possible and practicable—all forms of exploitation of, and cruelty to, animals for food, clothing or any other purpose; and by extension, promotes the development and use of animal-free alternatives for the benefit of animals, humans and the environment. In dietary terms it denotes the practice of dispensing with all products derived wholly or partly from animals."

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 12 points 1 year ago

They have no brain but aren't they like almost entirely nervous system? That's all you need to feel pain; the brain just makes it more complicated than "ouch, move away from that."

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] popemichael@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

A lot of Jelly fish are immortal? Just leave a few cells and wait for it to come back to life. Death-free food for the win

[-] keenanpepper@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, milk could also easily be death-free, but it's not vegan. It's also not suffering-free. So this suggestion kind of misses the point.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] activator90@lemmynsfw.com 11 points 1 year ago

I don't think animals care about weird human ideologies like veganism

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] GayPunkRock@the.coolest.zone 10 points 1 year ago

would u even get anything out of eating it tho?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Laticauda@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They are a living creature, so no, eating them is not vegan. It's not about the capacity of the animal to feel pain, it's about the capacity of humans to harm animals that most vegans take issue with, at least most that I know. Just because something can't feel pain, does that mean we should hurt it? I'm not vegan myself, and I don't think it's inherently wrong for omnivores to eat meat, but I do think that it doesn't matter if the animal can supposedly feel pain or not. We don't need to go looking for excuses to hurt other living creatures needlessly.

[-] Mininux@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Bacterias are living creatures as well, yet I doubt most vegans have an issue with them

edit: I don't even know why I picked bacterias as an example when I could just have chosen plants, which are by definition alive too

Just because something can't feel pain, does that mean we should hurt it ?

Maybe we don't have the same definition of hurting, but I can't see how "hurting" works with something that can't feel pain. Like can you hurt a chair ?

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2023
192 points (100.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35726 readers
1000 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS