205
submitted 11 months ago by silence7@slrpnk.net to c/politics@lemmy.world

Norma Anderson, a trailblazing former GOP legislator, is among the Colorado voters who have challenged the Republican front-runner’s candidacy in a case that will be heard by the Supreme Court

all 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 37 points 11 months ago

She thinks he's too young to be president.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 56 points 11 months ago

A bit snarky, but it's over his insurrection:

“He tried to overturn an election,” she said. “The very first time I ever ran, I didn’t win. I didn’t go out and try to change the election. I said, ‘Whoops, work harder next time, lady.’”

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago

I'd respect her for that except she's still a Republican voter.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 37 points 11 months ago

It's possible to utterly disagree with somebody on policy, and still recognize that they've passed the 'not a traitor' bar. She manages that.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 11 months ago

Yes. She manages to recognize that something that is true is true. Congratulations to her for being able to recognize reality on this specific topic but probably not any others since she's still a Republican.

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 24 points 11 months ago

I'd rather reinforce them when they do the right thing; it helps to shift the range of what's allowed on the right. Republicans are really good at love-bombing people who adopt one of their policy positions. We ought to think about the same.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

No, sorry. I do not praise Nazis for acknowledging that another Nazi was lying about an election that he obviously lost.

What do you think her opinion is on LGBT+ people if she votes Republican? Or on immigrants?

Did she vote for Cory Gardner in 2014? I bet she did.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cory_Gardner#LGBTQ_policy

I bet she also voted for Wayne Allard.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayne_Allard#Tenure

[-] silence7@slrpnk.net 15 points 11 months ago

I don't doubt that she's terrible on a host of other issues; as I said, I likely disagree with her on almost every policy.

But praise when people start to move out of that mindset is part of how you detach people from it.

[-] acceptable_pumpkin@lemmy.world 6 points 11 months ago

And again it’s a former representative. Where are the current Republicans fighting this?

[-] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago
[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

As Chico Marx said, "and you can keep it."

But thank you. :)

this post was submitted on 05 Feb 2024
205 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19338 readers
1970 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS