266
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] quams69@lemmy.world 42 points 7 months ago

It's significantly more fun than any recent pokemon game and its not exclusive to a console. It's fantastic for an early access release

[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago

It's also just a really good survival game.

[-] Grass@sh.itjust.works 13 points 7 months ago

I feel like recent pokemon is a low hurdle

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

Pokemon fans should appreciate Palworld just because it may force Gamefreak to stop fucking around.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Daxtron2@startrek.website 8 points 7 months ago

I justify it as even if it never receives an update, I'm still satisfied with what I paid for it. It's brought me and my friend many hours of fun.

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Eric_Pollock@lemmy.dbzer0.com 33 points 7 months ago

This game is dangerous...

I played it for the first time yesterday with my S/O, and we looked at the clock only to realize we had played for a little over ten hours straight... only stopping for lunch/dinner

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 15 points 7 months ago

It'll wear off. I felt like that for Valheim and then when I reached the end I went "Oh. Alright. Whelp."

[-] JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world 16 points 7 months ago

I mean, any survival game is like that. Hell, just about any game is like that. Eventually you've done about all you want to do, and then it's time to move on. And that's fine.

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 11 points 7 months ago

I don't know, games like Minecraft, Factorio, Satisfactory, Rust, they all have a lot of staying power. There's always burnout but I don't think that Palworld is going to survive to the "We should go back to that" stage.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AlexWIWA@lemmy.ml 8 points 7 months ago

I just got done with an eight hour session. This game is exceptionally dangerous

[-] HawlSera@lemm.ee 32 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I wonder if anyone involved in this debate has even played both games... because outside of having a bunch of adorable yet vicious critters with grimdark world implications.. they're nothing alike

Might as well be comparing Resident Evil to House of the Dead, both have zombies, both take place in a house, both have terrible voice acting.. but one's intended to be scary and has very limited resources and depressing music to give that feel, while the other is a goofy action game intended to be B-Grade schlock where you just mindlessly shoot things

[-] Sheeple@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

Palworld gameplay isn't even remotely similar to Pokemon. Its basically Ark Survival that just so happens to have plagiarised pokemon designs instead of dinosaurs.

I kinda wish they didn't go such overt plagiarism in terms of design because then Palworld could be a nice game on its own

[-] MalachaiConstant@lemmy.world 12 points 7 months ago

I'm reminded of how Fortnight, arguably the most popular game ever, is a direct rip off of PUBG, which is itself a repackaged Arma 2 mod

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 25 points 7 months ago

It is fun. Of you played Ark it has the same vibes minus the 12 hours of berry hasting to catch one Dino.

[-] arefx@lemmy.ml 15 points 7 months ago
[-] starman2112@sh.itjust.works 18 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

As someone who spent tens, maybe hundreds of hours on ark... It's so much more fun than ark. I have some good memories from that game, but it's so not worth logging in every single day to feed the dinosaurs

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 23 points 7 months ago

I'm absolutely loving it. I was expecting a total shit post of a game but there is actual depth to this. And for a game this early into early access it's running amazingly. The only real bugs I've run into so far is occasionally my worker pals get stuck and start to starve so I have to throw them into the box and then take them back out real quick. In the end though that happens like three or four times in several hours?

load more comments (12 replies)
[-] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 23 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Can confirm: It's fun enough for $26. It's kinda like if ARK, Pokemon, and BOTW had a baby. It is most similar to ARK though, so if you're looking for a straight up pokemon game, this might not be what you're looking for.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 9 points 7 months ago

I played for 15 minutes and said "I'd rather play BotW."

Beating fluffy animals with a club to death or enslavement just isn't my speed.

Especially when they start running from you...

They know. They're afraid. They won't let you make their name Toby.

[-] keefshape@lemmy.ca 9 points 7 months ago

You're doing it wrong. Fun hot take, sure, but yeah....

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Anamnesis@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago

It may be fun but I'll never know because it looks very not fun.

[-] JustAnotherRando@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

If you like survival games (Ark, Rust, Valheim...), you'd probably like it. It's a pretty decent survival game, and getting it's nice having the Pals grind your resources for you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] chetradley@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

I know I'd hate it. It looks like a mix of my least favorite game mechanics: grinding, foraging and crafting.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 7 months ago

just pirate it

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] cocobean@sh.itjust.works 14 points 7 months ago

I'm pretty sure John Daly sold his soul to the devil. The more I hear about how he treats his body the more amazed I am that he can still play golf. Or live.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] davemeech@lemmy.ca 13 points 7 months ago

I have yet to have a solid informed grasp of whether Palworld manifested their sources of inspiration in good faith, but my tentative opinion at the moment is that hopefully this presses the Pokemon Company to innovate and elevate their overall game. The switch generation to me represented a generation of mismanagement and obvious management generated timelines and barriers, which is super unfortunate for Pokemon's transition to a console.

Competition hopefully might change that.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Shiggles@sh.itjust.works 12 points 7 months ago

It’s clearly got more potential than it’s currently using right now, game is fun but will almost certainly be better in 3-6 months. No shame in waiting for a finished product, either.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2024
266 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

2904 readers
6 users here now

!gaming is a community for gaming noobs through gaming aficionados. Unlike !games, we don’t take ourselves quite as serious. Shitposts and memes are welcome.

Our Rules:

1. Keep it civil.


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only.


2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry.


I should not need to explain this one.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month.


Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.



Logo uses joystick by liftarn

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS