373
submitted 8 months ago by robocall@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world

The Main Intelligence Directorate of Ukraine's Ministry of Defense claims that pro-Ukrainian hacktivists breached the Russian Center for Space Hydrometeorology, aka "planeta" (планета), and wiped 2 petabytes of data.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] derpgon@programming.dev 59 points 8 months ago

I see all the comments saying Ukraine targeted non-military entity. But IMO, Russia can get fucked. I am not sure if they shared the data with anyone, or kept it to themselves, but no loss.

[-] Pretzilla@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

For sure they use it for war purposes.

They sure as fuck aren't using it for climate research. They dgaf about climate.

Ed: hack was maybe part of a bigger defense strike: https://euromaidanpress.com/2024/01/27/ukrainian-cyberattacks-cripple-russian-defense-contractor-weather-center/

[-] cheesebag@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

The Russian Federation actually does give a fuck about climate... They want to make global warming worse. They get to sell more gas, they get more arable land up north, and they open up shipping routes in the Arctic. Putin is Captain Planet levels of evil, fr.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

Following that logic, civilians should be fair game because "Russia can get fucked".

[-] amorpheus@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

Ukrainian civilians are fair game to the Russian military, so...

[-] Scubus@sh.itjust.works 12 points 8 months ago

Israel 2 electric boogaloo

[-] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 17 points 8 months ago

I love how we're equating loss of data to loss of human life.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Taking a "this is justified because fuck Russia" line of logic to its logical conclusion is not the same as equating data loss to loss of human life.

[-] joyjoy@lemm.ee 13 points 8 months ago

This has "they deserved it" energy.

[-] shasta@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

Yes, they did

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 41 points 8 months ago

They’d be morons if they didn’t back up important data off site.

[-] Nomad@infosec.pub 43 points 8 months ago

Have you ever seen any academic IT systems? They are all underfunded ans run by grad students.

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 18 points 8 months ago

Even worse, they are often a case of accretion by generations of grad students and undergrads.

E.g. a university was redoing how it hosted student club websites. When it eventually killed the old hosting, 1 site stayed working. It was eventually tracked down to a little mini pc mounted above the false ceiling. It had been plodding away for 20 odd years, most of that without any maintenance at all.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] 50gp@kbin.social 7 points 8 months ago

and here we have underfunded science with lots of russian corruption on top

real chance of backup system money disappearing in pockets...

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago

You’re insulting grad students. ;) But yea, I imagine it is very underfunded!

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 28 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Planeta is a state research center using space satellite data and ground sources like radars and stations to provide information and accurate predictions about weather, climate, natural disasters, extreme phenomena, and volcanic monitoring.

That’s just fucking stupid of them.

This massive volume of information would be difficult and costly to store in backups, so if Ukraine's claims are true, this is a catastrophic attack on Planeta.

A 45tb tape would cost me a consumer $98, 45 of them would be 2pb and cost a whopping $4,320, it would surely be even cheaper for a bulk order at non-consumer costs. Hardly difficult or costly.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 22 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

A 45tb tape would cost me a consumer $98, 45 of them would be 2pb and cost a whopping $4,320, it would surely be even cheaper for a bulk order at non-consumer costs. Hardly difficult or costly.

it’s not just the cost of the tape (or whatever storage medium). it’s the cost of maintaining a secure off-site backup system. surely, you understand this, and how one is much more expensive than the other, especially at scale.

[-] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

I can pretty much guarantee that the cost of creating an offsite backup is trivial compared to the budget used to collect and analyze those data. I can’t read Russian anymore and it’s probably not published in a discoverable way, but I’m going to offer up the possibility that the sat network, research scientist teams, sys admins, and everything else that goes into the portion of the Russian government’s budget for this work wouldn’t have even seen that as a rounding error. I’ve worked with US government budgets and I know how tight fisted committees can be, and while the USG isn’t Google in terms of writing checks for tech, and while the Russians are probably an order of magnitude or two poorer than our budgets, it’s still be a no brainer in terms of costs. Either they just didn’t think of it (which I’ve seen far more times than I can tell you about) or it got eliminated as a line item by some bureaucrats who don’t understand cost/benefit analysis (which we’ve all also seen), it wasn’t truly a cost thing. Compared to the price associated with sat launches and data analysis, $10-$20k/ month for data retention is nothing.

Also, I sort of suspect that these were dual use systems. When you’re talking about the sensing tech they’re using, there are the very obvious and direct intel applications.

[-] Marsupial@quokk.au 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Would they maintain their own private off-site backup or would they be in a cluster with other government agencies or renting out from a commercial operation?

The cost would be massive for you or I to utilise such services, less so for an agency, and it certainly isn't difficult.

I understand science is generally always under funded and there's probably some oligarch skimming off of their budget, but I still don't see this being the win they think it is in any form. I can only hope the climate data is not lost to all time.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Would they maintain their own private off-site backup or would they be in a cluster with other government agencies or renting out from a commercial operation?

nobody said they would. I’m just pointing out that the difficulty of backing up 45TB+ of computational meteorological data is a greater consideration than a bulk purchase of magnetic tape.

and, really, the carelessness with which you regard research and knowledge is pretty disgusting. don’t think you’re some hero for that. that’s hundreds of millions - possibly billions - of dollars of research and work let and hundreds of thousands of man-hours just gone. and, again, the data, the analysis, and the knowledge. just gone.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 16 points 8 months ago

Technically with 45tb they mean "45tb of highly compressible text", actually is 18tb.

And raw images aren't compressible

With a catch like this the genius marketing could call them "100 petabyte tapes" (only if you store zero-filled files)

So it needs more tapes and the drive itself is also very expensive, around $10k, and it's not something that a Russian government entity can access easily today, but needs to be bought from grey market resellers with higher markup.

Then needs a dedicated server for that, a person (or a robotic arm) that changes the tapes every few hours, temperature controlled off-site storage...

[-] Hooverx@lemm.ee 2 points 8 months ago

Yes, but that makes the propaganda sound bad.

(you also need the tape read/write machine and a storage system, but those aren't that expensive either).

[-] Paragone@lemmy.world 21 points 8 months ago

That was a non-military target.

That also harmed science.

That kind of targetting is what I expect of Russia, but if Ukranians are doing it to, then it means they're losing their ability to discern who the proper targets are, vs who the not proper targets are, and are assaulting more indiscriminately.

Not wise, Ukraina, sorry.

_ /\ _

[-] grozzle@lemm.ee 16 points 8 months ago

being "science" doesn't make make it harmless.

good meteorology supports military operations.

if it hurts russia's accuracy in predicting weather, it helps Ukraine's chance for surviving this war.

nobody says this particular action was a top priority, but every little resistance against the russian genocide helps.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 5 points 8 months ago

It was actually military R&D that helped develop meteorology to the point it is today since predicting the weather even inaccurately can be a decent boon in warfare.

[-] GentlemanLoser@ttrpg.network 14 points 8 months ago

Oh no not SCIENCE

THEY HURT SCIENCE YOU GUYS 😭

[-] Hubi@feddit.de 13 points 8 months ago

The heavy water plant the Germans set up in WW2 was also "science" and it's still a good thing that it was sabotaged.

[-] Harbinger01173430@lemmy.world 7 points 8 months ago

The civilian script kiddies did that or the Ukrainian government? In both cases...yeah, they are being kinda moronic and harmful by destroying research.

[-] hark@lemmy.world 14 points 8 months ago

Hell yeah, score another point for the anti-science team!

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 13 points 8 months ago

1024 Terabytes = 1 Petabyte

[-] helmet91@lemmy.world 23 points 8 months ago

1000 Terabytes (TB) = 1 Petabyte (PB).

Or: 1024 Tebibytes (TiB) = 1 Pebibyte (PiB)

Or: 1024 Terabytes (TB) = 1.024 Petabytes (PB)

Or: 1024 Terabytes (TB) = 1 Petabyte (TB), 24 Terabytes (TB)

But: 1024 Terabytes (TB) != 1 Petabyte (PB)

[-] guh65@futurology.today 9 points 8 months ago

Crime: 😡
Crime, Ukraine: 🤩

[-] Hubi@feddit.de 12 points 8 months ago

Erasing data that is used for military reconnaissance in a hostile country is not a crime.

[-] guh65@futurology.today 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Let me guess, would you approve ukraine burning libraries in russia? It is a hostile country where every single russian is hostile, after all. Libraries are a source of knowledge and knowledge can be used for war. Even educational institutions need to be shut down as they aid in research for war related purposes.

[-] Hubi@feddit.de 10 points 8 months ago

If they set up a military installation inside a library with the purpose of harming Ukraine, then yes. Aside from that, this is a ridiculous comparison.

[-] Dicska@lemmy.world 6 points 8 months ago

Manslaughter is a crime. How would you defend your country when the enemy is killing your people?

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
373 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38847 readers
1486 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS