619
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

I’m not suggesting that someone should disable the brakes on his wheelchair and then roll him into the street, but were he to be rolled into the street with no brakes, I wouldn’t be surprised.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 19 points 1 year ago

I want to say it'll never happen, but they may not be so good at paying attention to prevailing trends. If Texit happens I'll be watching with a big bowl of popcorn.

Willy Wonka: Stop. Don't. Come back.

[-] eddanja@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Old guy who is only getting older wants to dictate so that he has some sort of legacy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Twentytwodividedby7@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

They know federal law supercedes state law, right?

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

the argument is that because they're being "invaded" and that the federal government isn't doing anything to protect them from that "invasion"... it's a "breach of contract" that then invalidates everything else.

Which is a dissenting opinion by a lone justice, and not what was the actual ruling in that precedent; and there's no legal or technical definition that defines migrant refugees showing up seeking asylum as an invasion.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kushia@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Dog whistle to his supporters, that's all.

If they actually tried anything they'd be snuffed out pretty fast.

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Go for it, Abbott. Let's see your beloved Texas Rangers go up against satellite-guided drone bombers.

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

It's all fun and games until you are shredded by cluster bombs.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] HiddenLychee@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

I don't fucking get this. Abbot literally ships illegal immigrants by the bus load into the country free of charge, how is he not a fundamental cog in the illegal immigration machine?

[-] linearchaos@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago

They've basically finally got around to calling the bluff. No one's going to do anything.

We had a coup attempt last year and people are getting slapped on the wrist.

The government's not going to do anything about anything until there's a full-on civil war.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] SaltySalamander@kbin.social 16 points 1 year ago

Please, try it. I dare you, Abbott.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] the_q@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Do it. Go on.

[-] Furbag@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Someone should tell these guys it's not 1861 anymore. They might find themselves on the business end of a hellfire missile if they keep running their yaps with impunity or take actionable steps towards actually seceding. Also known in modern vernacular as "Fuck around and find out".

[-] Bdtrngl@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago

"The dildo of consequence rarely arrives lubed"

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] iconic_admin@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Abbott is so full of shit. Texas isn’t succeeding from anything.

[-] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Texas is neither succeeding nor seceding

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] Tronn4@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

The south is stupidly rising again

[-] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Inciting an insurrection…

[-] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

For a party that claims to love and respect the US Constitution, being filled to gills with "constitutional orginalists," I don't think any Republican has ever actually read the document. If they had even glanced over it, they would have looked at Article 6, Paragraph 2 also known as the "Federal Supremacy Clause." It's meaning is that law at the Federal level supercedes State laws and even state constitutions. The "Founding Fathers" intended for the Federal government to hold supremacy over the state governments... now it isn't written in plain English, but it is plain enough. Further, the end of our Civil War the court case Texas v White made it plain as day legally that no State may leave the union. Again, the party of "law and order" comes in clutch with that misunderstanding of what those words mean.

All that being said, succession isn't actually that popular (even in Texas). There would likely be a mass revolt against it in any state attempting it. Further, even a play at attempting it would be a political death sentence (as well as, perhaps, a literal one). Any insurrection against the federal government, even by a collection of contiguous states, would face a similar challenge the capitalists/monarchists (or Whites) of the Russian Civil War faced. The major population centers wouldn't recognize the authority of those in revolt and all they'd be left with would be the hinterlands and rural towns. Which is not a great position to be in strategically (again, see: the outcome of the Russian Civil War).

This is all not to mention, while States have their own National Guards, the insurrectionists would have to convince those troops to fire on troops who are wearing the same uniform. You'd have to convince their officers to break their oath to uphold both US law and face a possible death sentence if captured. I don't know Abbott's relationship with his National Guardsmen, but I highly doubt many officers will go in with him in this piece of political theater.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] FiremanEdsRevenge@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

I got $400 on Cartels blowing them the fuck away.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ganksy@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

He's about to go full Sovcit

[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

I knew we were teasing World War III but I didn't think it would start with a Civil War.

[-] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Man, Texas sure does blow

[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

My favorite part of this is that despite this “border crisis, ”Gregory Wayne Abbott is galavanting around fkn India like he’s Anthony fkn Bourdain. Meanwhile, we have all sorts of shit convoys and armed goofies coming there to “volunteer in Texas.” Eagle Pass is only 97% Hispanic, so I’m sure nobody will get confused and murder some nice citizen or anything.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›
this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2024
619 points (100.0% liked)

politics

20664 readers
3487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS