920
Critique (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SnotFlickerman to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world

I literally do blame the Democrats for Trump, and if you don't, you weren't paying attention.

Plenty of us were critiquing Clinton's campaign on those merits and were consistently talked down to in shocker the same way we're being talked down to now. Shocker, she lost. I remember saying a few weeks before the election "We're about to get Brexited." I put my vote down for Clinton, because Trump is fucking insane, and that was clear before he was President. It was clear in the fucking 1980's.

Being able to critique our leaders is supposed to be what is the difference between us and conservative voters. They're the cult who unquestioningly believes all the bullshit that comes out of Trump's mouth and diapers. I find it weird that people think we should be more like them in regards to our leaders like that would be a good thing.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] carl_dungeon@lemmy.world 117 points 1 year ago

The fact that one can win the popular vote and still lose is a yuuuuge part of what’s wrong with our fucked up voting system.

[-] trafficnab@lemmy.ca 69 points 1 year ago

One single current supreme court justice was appointed by a republican president who won the popular vote.

There's six of them.

[-] can@sh.itjust.works 28 points 1 year ago

That's an astounding fact that speaks to the much deeper problem.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] RealFknNito@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Popular vote should just be the vote.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] squiblet@kbin.social 113 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hillary Clinton’s campaign was poorly run, but she didn’t invent Trump or get millions of people to vote for him. Trump was set up by 25+ years of extremist Republican media - people like Limbaugh, Murdoch, O’Reilly - and enabled by the “liberal” mainstream media, who wouldn’t stop talking about his stupid shit for the 2 years leading up to the campaign, and are doing the same thing this time.

[-] SnotFlickerman 59 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just a reminder that Clinton had deep press connections and so acting like her elevating of Trump didn't impact other media sources is a bit disingenuous. It was a campaign strategy to elevate Trump, and that included working with "friendly" journalists.

Did people forget that Correct the Record were literally keyboard warriors employed by the DNC to go and do exactly the kind of shit I'm complaining about online. Shitting all over progressives and forum sliding?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 year ago

Trump was an outsider candidate that took advantage of anti-establisment sentiment. He was barely a republican before 2016. He won because Hillary was incompetent and the DNC didn't pick up on the anti-establishment vibes, and picked the most establishment candidate possible. Yes Republicans have been attacking Hillary since Bill got elected, but that wasn't news to Democrats that didn't care.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Sekrayray@lemmy.world 62 points 1 year ago

I know this isn’t necessarily the point of the post, but I’m going to use this as an opportunity to bring it up anyway—

I can’t help but fear that the 2024 election is going to be an example of the DNC “reaping what they sowed.” In 2020 it felt like the DNC did whatever they could to push Biden through as a candidate despite more youthful, progressive options (and Bernie, who wasn’t youthful, but was progressive and in line with what a lot of the US left wanted). In many wants it felt like they did this because Biden was:

  1. More moderate in willing to bend to the political interests of lobbyists
  2. An easier option to beat Trump

In some ways I understand why it happened, but I was terrified of the situation we currently are in back then. Fast forward four years and now we’re left with a very elderly Biden versus an even more extreme Trump; and now it’s not a sure shot that Biden is going to win. Instead of uniting as a party and building up a new candidate who truly represented the people’s interests in 2020 the DNC decided to kick the can. As a result of that can kicking we may be facing the end of American democracy as we know it in 2024. It’s sickening to me.

[-] SnotFlickerman 17 points 1 year ago

No, that's definitely part of the point!!! Excellent addition, thank you.

[-] ikidd@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

building up a new candidate who truly represented the people’s interests

You realize the DNC has no interest whatsoever in this, right? Like the Wasserman/Clinton fix was exactly this not happening.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] BananaTrifleViolin@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago

It's a good point but there is plenty of blame to go around. The democrats have part of the responsibility, but the lions share sits with the republicans.

The democrats are also at fault for elevating Clinton. She was a poor candidate who was backed by the political establishment. The notion it was "her turn" had already played out with Obama and she lost handily. There were better candidates in the primaries.

The same problem is happening with Biden. He is a bad candidate but he is being waved through by the party out of a paralysing fear of trump.

But they're all symptoms of the extremely broken US electoral system with first past the post, gerrymandering, electoral colleges and politically appointed and elected officials including judges all entrenching the absolute power of 2 parties.

In my opinion the solution would be at the grass roots with local plebiscites on proportional representation in elections to local and state government, and other positions. That would bring more meaningful change than most of the other propositions that get put on the ballots as it'd allow a route for political opposition to organise into new parties, capture funding and power and gradually build a base to fight and win other elections.

Unfortunately the 2 main parties have convinced the electorate that the status quo is vital. For example California is a "democrat state" and anything that undermines that is dangerous because the enemy might get in. It's all bullshit. The rules are being set by the incumbents but actually the whole game needs to change.

[-] ryathal@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 year ago

The real problem is the cap on the size of the house of representatives. If we doubled the size, California would get about 60 more representatives and votes, while states like Wyoming might get one more vote. It would also reduce the cost of campaigning per candidate, because donors aren't just going to give significantly more money just because more people are running.

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 44 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] MotoAsh@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Tribal thinking is a sign of lack of maturity. If you don't think being, "better than TFG." is a pathetic excuse for a party platform, you're either a child or utterly incompetent at governing, or both.

Similarly, if anyone assumes someone attacking Democrats, a center-right party, MUST be coming from the right ... they're painfully ignorant of politics in general.

Too bad this country is full of immature children that managed to reach adult age... Regardless of how bad the Dems are, they're still the only valid choice for someone making moral decisions. No, Biden is anything but perfect, but literally no one else can win that isn't outright evil ... partly because Democrats run a pathetic party and don't actually fight for democracy.

[-] SnotFlickerman 31 points 1 year ago

Yep. That's what makes it so downright abusive for them to dangle fascism over our heads like a threat if we don't get behind their milquetoast bullshit half-ass glad-handing fascists fuckery. They know we don't have a choice so they don't even fucking try.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[-] Zuberi@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 1 year ago

Critiquing Biden is not an endorsement of trump

Damn if lemmy.world could read, I'd put that on a shirt 🥲

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

There are literally only two options

I'm going to support a third option

A THIRD OPTION IS SUPPORT FOR THE FIRST OPTION!

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 41 points 1 year ago

Moderation around here is not prepared for this trash to seriously pick up this year.

Can't wait to hear my daily "reminders" about how everything is actually the DNC's fault for not resurrecting Bernie's campaign for a third time because he'd totally win this time.

[-] 31337@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago

The DNC purposely drew the press's attention to Trump in the primaries to intentionally move the Republican party further right. They thought the far-right candidates would be easier to beat: https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2016/11/hillary-clinton-2016-donald-trump-214428/

Democratic groups and candidates purposely took out ads promoting pro-Trump candidates in 2022. This is a very dangerous strategy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] AnonTwo@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago

I mean it's fine to critique the DNC as long as we don't ignore the current political climate. We had an insurrection, confidential documents were stolen, spies were killed.

That president worked with his party to get several justices who have caused a divisive climate over abortion, which has had several state upsets due to it being more unpopular than initially believed.

The President responsible for this is currently buried in court cases. He is the presumed frontrunner for his party despite everything listed. The most likely reason he wants it above his dictatorial speeches is that he wants a pardon for everything he's done up until now. That at the end of the day is the problem that nothing else can really beat out, but if we really had to add anything, it's that he hasn't even shown to be opposed to any of the things that are negatively affecting the current President.

Like I didn't think he was a great President, but it's pretty much everything he did going out the door that made it clear he shouldn't come back. For all of DNCs issues, it was absolutely the republican party at the end of the day that made the situation we have today. The DNC was just incompetent to do anything about it.

I think the general issue with a lot of anti-DNC posts lately is that they come off as "We will vote for a party that doesn't win on any level of government, just to show our opinion"

Which...seems to ignore that one party is trying to erode voting rights, which would make it hard to fix these issues long-term, and assumes that DNC would take it they lost votes to a third party....which lets be real here, if you already think they don't pay attention, they won't when you do that. It also comes off as a bit insincere, since if you truly are against the DNC...you should be trying to build the 3rd parties enough to actually win in some states, before trying to take on the presidency...I there probably aren't even enough states that know who the third parties are to possibly get them elected at this time.

So yeah, mainly my problem with a lot of anti-DNC posts isn't so much they make the democrats to be incompetent. They honestly are. It's that they seem to ignore the the domestic threats coming from the other party, and bury into some completely unrealistic goals currently.

And yes, I will just say it: We have failed as a civilization. No actions will prevent another genocide in the current political climate. It is supported bipartisan. It is literally one of the only things supported bipartisan.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago

I literally do blame the Democrats for Trump, and if you don’t, you weren’t paying attention.

Barack Obama had the opportunity to become the next FDR. Instead, we got a modern day Woodrow Wilson, more interested in shoring up domestic businesses and building out international military alliances than repairing the post-'08 damage to the housing economy or extending full public health benefits to a nation crippled by medical bankruptcies.

By the time he left office, he was running on... what? A Pacific Rim trade deal we didn't need. A climate change crisis he'd failed to address. A slew of new military conflicts in the Middle East introduced under his administration that he'd originally promised to end. A federal court system he'd allowed his Senate rivals to hijack.

Hillary sucked. But far too little credit is afforded to the guy who had eight years to deliver on desperately needed federal reforms and - either through incompetence or unwillingness - failed to do so.

[-] ZombiFrancis@sh.itjust.works 23 points 1 year ago

"Abortion is not my highest legislative priority." -Obama 2009

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 1 year ago

I don't have a problem with people critiquing Democrats, I have a problem with them arguing that voting for democrats is bad.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Yeah, Letting the far right get voted in does not push the Democrats to the left, if anything it pulls them right. Fight like hell but protest abstaining does not achieve anything.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] deft@lemmy.wtf 32 points 1 year ago

Voters =/= DNC though

We got Trump because Clinton was largely uninspiring. She made herself this bland neolib that nobody actually wanted to vote for and then mocked Trump as a non threat.

Everything you said is true but I personally think the real reason it happened was because Clinton was a bad pitch and she would've lost to most Republicans at the time.

They should've gone with Bernie just that simple

[-] Seraph@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago

But the DNC didn't care about the primary votes and shoved her in because "we need a female president" or some shit.

I genuinely believe your average person both wants a female president and badly does not want it to be Hillary.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] SnotFlickerman 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

She literally ran the same year as Jeb "Please Clap" Bush, and this was after a stint at Secretary of State where she had to do an "apology tour" for spying on other nations.

People were fed up with political dynasties that year, and the fact that the Democrats couldn't read the room is why they lost.

The DNC literally hid behind being a private club to justify putting their finger on the scale for Clinton.

What's that old saying? "If you have the facts on your side, pound the facts; if you have the law on your side, pound the law; if you have neither the facts nor the law, pound the table."

https://observer.com/2017/05/dnc-lawsuit-presidential-primaries-bernie-sanders-supporters/

But here, where you have a party that's saying, We're gonna, you know, choose our standard bearer, and we're gonna follow these general rules of the road, which we are voluntarily deciding, we could have -- and we could have voluntarily decided that, look, we're gonna go into back rooms like they used to and smoke cigars and pick the candidate that way. That's not the way it was done. But they could have. And that would have also been their right, and it would drag the COurt well into party politics, internal party politics to answer those questions.

Here is the Democrats pounding the law that the DNC is a private club, so nobody can say their own rules are fair but them. They never argued the facts about whether or not it was rigged, because they didn't have facts to support that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] YeetPics@mander.xyz 30 points 1 year ago

Yes!

Next up; How I spilled my Pepsi and why I blame coke.

[-] archomrade@midwest.social 28 points 1 year ago

If we keep trump out but do nothing else, we've only delayed a fascistic movement reaching the white house, not defeated it.

Biden needs to put forward actual policies that address the conditions that are fostering the violent fascistic rhetoric, not just so that he can win in November but so that we aren't dealing with a growing nationalism problem for the next cycle.

The people who are criticizing Biden now desperately want him to succeed by these measures, but don't believe he's yet done enough. Maybe if we were having this debate a month out from election day, then we should be panicked about the electoral calculus; but he has ample (or at least some) time to address the concerns being raised here. In a non-incumbent cycle, a primary would help refine the policy agenda for the general. So far all we've gotten is "we have to keep trump out".

That is not a winning agenda (no matter how true it is). It didn't work in 2016, and it likely won't work now. Biden needs something tangible to campaign on, and right now it's not clear that he has one.

[-] SnotFlickerman 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They plan on doing the same thing they did in 2016. Beat voters over the head with "how great of a job we're doing" while ignoring voters real concerns, talking down to them, and generally leaning on "if you don't vote for us, you'll end up with a fascist who wants to kill you." Which in itself certainly feels like a threat. "We can skip the country to escape, you can't, better vote for us!" It's downright abusive and it has an unfortunately good chance at catching up with them this election and the only people who will pay are the US citizens.

Still voting for Biden anway. Don't really have a choice if I don't want fascism. Just don't like being bullied into it by the people I'm voting for while they smugly ignore my legitimate concerns.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Spiralvortexisalie@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

The worst part for me is I literally see the hubris playing out again with Joe Biden’s stance of only running because he is the only one who can beat Trump. Polling keeps showing he is literally the only possible candidate on Dem side that could lose against him. It seems most Dems are either hoping Trump won’t win and those who think he will are shouting any and every other name including the former first lady Michelle Obama, over Biden or even his VP Harris. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/01/19/us/politics/trump-biden-voters-2024-election.html https://www.nbcnews.com/meet-the-press/first-read/biden-trump-both-underperform-generic-opponents-poll-finds-rcna126098 https://www.cbsnews.com/news/trump-national-lead-grows-opinion-poll-republican-primary/

[-] SnotFlickerman 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

This whole "we have to beat Trump at the ballot box" shit also shows how truly toothless the Democrats are. This guy started a fucking insurrection and they're letting him run for President. They waited two years until he started selling nuclear secrets to start any criminal proceedings against him. I've said plenty of times our reluctance to punish Bush for war crimes is a direct line to Trump. They weren't willing to stand up for war crimes, and they won't stand up for this.

They literally are signaling loud and clear that if Trump wins again, even illegitimately, they will not be the defenders of democracy and they will step aside and let Trump be a dictator.

Hell, they'll probably pull a Ray Nagin and run off to Europe to cry on CNN Europe about how sad they are for all of us still stuck here under Trump's authoritarian thumb.

[-] Orbituary@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Waiting 2 years was political. Nothing more. They're to blame again if Trump gets in. I'm so tired of their stupid milquetoast candidates.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Delta_V@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

Critiquing Democrats is not an endorsement of Republicans

OK.
Just be aware that doing so publicly, especially around election time, increases the probability of Republicans getting elected. So ask yourself if its the right time and place - regardless of what your intentions are, what sort of effects will your actions actually cause in the world?

IMO, the best time and place to make your opinion on Democratic policy known is the Democratic primary election and who you choose to help campaign for the primaries.

[-] SnotFlickerman 25 points 1 year ago

As I pointed out to someone else: So valid critiques of the Democrats are what depress and demotivate voters, not... *checks notes... the things that the Democrats failed at themselves? No, it only rises to upsetting people when people talk about it. Do you realize that's what you're arguing here, that Democratic failures don't demotivate people, only people talking about them.

I'm sorry but I'm pretty sure the failures are demotivating on their own, and folks like me are demotivated by being told we're not allowed to talk about them.

Also, we have elections every two years. My entire life, I've been told it's "too close to an election to for that kind of critique."

As I asked others (with no good answers) when are we going to be allowed to critique them, then? Because I'm pushing fifty and I've dealt with this bullshit "you can't critique them NOW" for over twenty fucking years of voting.

[-] Delta_V@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago
[-] SnotFlickerman 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you might be the woosh since you don't think actions demotivate people, only people talking about those things.

Also, assumptions that we don't take part in the process has been going on for over twenty years as well. But I guess you don't give a shit enough to find out if I'm actually involved, do you? Easier to just assume I'm not, right? Than to have to actually engage with the point?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago

IMO, the best time and place to make your opinion on Democratic policy known is the Democratic primary election and who you choose to help campaign for the primaries

No, because Superdelegates. It’s not a real vote if the party apparatus can force the result they want by blunting a challenger’s momentum/stopping their win.

Besides, airing complaints at the primary only gets them heard by the hyper-engaged of the electorate. I.e. not your typical voter. “Go vote in the primary” is the correct messages, yes. But you’ll never be heard by a bigger crowd who might agree and also agitate for change(s).

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] robocall@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

The dnc should have let Bernie Sanders become the nominatee like the voters wanted, instead of rigging the primary for Hillary.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] Empricorn@feddit.nl 22 points 1 year ago

Okay. Blame them all you want, just don't stay home on Election Day. VOTE against Donald Trump as he's the more immediate problem, then we demand voting reform...

load more comments (16 replies)
[-] Arthur_Leywin@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Critiquing Democrats is not endorsing Republicans but constantly saying Biden is bad over and over and making sure that's the only thing that is said is endorsing Republicans. You really think people who hate Biden also say "but remember, the Republicans are worse."

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Some More News made a really good point: If we can't call out our own guy without being told we're helping the other guy, how is that... good?

load more comments (19 replies)
[-] Nougat@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago

I literally do blame the Democrats for Trump, and if you don’t, you weren’t paying attention.

I wasn't paying attention?

The structure of government in the US, federal and state, has always been unfairly tilted in favor of "land" over "people." The electoral college is the most glaring example, but even the concept of giving each state two Senators regardless of population, and then requiring bills to pass the Senate to become law, makes everything that happens in the federal government require the approval of people who have more political power than their number warrants. State governments are organized in the exact same way. The Three-Fifths Compromise did even more, giving slave states far more representation in the House than their free citizens warranted. The power and influence that comes with wealth tips the scales, too - again, in so many places where that wealth was extracted from human bondage and handed over to the slaveowners. Sprinkle some gerrymandering on top of that.

This was all in place well before any well-organized political parties existed in the United States.

The US has always, and by design, been arranged to benefit assholes. Trump and his supporters are just today's assholes, and nobody else in the world is responsible for that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Xanis@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

In this thread:

People reminding the rest of us how much they don't remember shit. Also in this thread: See how propaganda works! More at 11.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jan 2024
920 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7966 readers
2351 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

No AI generated content.Content posted must not be created by AI with the intent to mimic the style of existing images

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS