669
submitted 10 months ago by boem@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 58 points 10 months ago

I haven't used Google for awhile now. It just became an ad-ridden hellhole.

[-] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

Do people not have ad blockers anymore?

[-] deweydecibel@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's not what we're talking about. Ad blockers don't do anything to fix Google's search algorithm

load more comments (11 replies)
[-] Steve@communick.news 11 points 10 months ago

That's why I like Kagi. I do almost anything to avoid ads

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 26 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] LWD@lemm.ee 8 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
[-] Steve@communick.news 8 points 10 months ago

Not really no.
Kagi has vastly more features. Most are extremely useful. Including privacy.
And the whole "funding a bigot" complaint strikes me as kind of silly. The "partnership" is just them using the Brave search API, no different than they do Google, Bing, and a few others. I even have Brave as one of my sanity check browsers when something doesn't work on Firefox.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] doublejay1999@lemmy.world 36 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Search engine are pretty much over. They ate themselves

[-] sighofannoyance@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

SEO destroyed the search providers, and now that search is useless, seo has become useless.

[-] refurbishedrefurbisher@lemmy.sdf.org 18 points 10 months ago

It's almost like greed/the need to step on others to get ahead ruins everything or something.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] northendtrooper@lemmy.ca 33 points 10 months ago

I'm finding that LLMs are doing a better job for searching for new things. If I have a question, instead of going to google or bing I'll goto chatGPT and ask some of that nature with some sources for further reading.

Never would I think that I would need to use AI to answer simple search and yet here we are because the sole purpose of a search engine doesn't really exist anymore.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 81 points 10 months ago

The problem is, you can't trust ChatGPT to not lie to you.

And since generative AI is now being used all over the place, you just can't trust anything unless you know damn well that a human entered the info, and then that's a coin flip.

[-] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 20 points 10 months ago

OTOH, you also can't trust humans not to lie to you.

[-] chaogomu@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

That's the coin flip.

[-] Lmaydev@programming.dev 11 points 10 months ago

The newer ones search the internet and generate from the results not their training and provide sources.

So that's not such a worry now.

Anyone who used ChatGPT for information and not text generation was always using it wrong.

[-] BakerBagel@midwest.social 15 points 10 months ago

Except people are using LLM to generate web pages on something to get clicks. Which means LLM's are training off of information generated by other LLM's. It's an ouroboros of fake information.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

plus search engines don't lecture me as much for typing naughty sex words

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] LWD@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Landless2029@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Oddly I prefer Bing because it'll cite the source!

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] werefreeatlast@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago

Here's my theory... Google wants to artificially fuck up it's search functionality. It wants to offer good performance for a fee. And it's going to be doing that by giving it's own AI the correct filters while at the same time tripping every other AI capable of searching the net such that the other AI results become garbage and only the Google one works correctly. Anyway that's my conspiracy theory, fuck Google with a bunch of sharp forks.

[-] Chadus_Maximus@lemm.ee 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Or they just cannot complete with literal millions of people attempting to optimize their webpages for discovery using Google.

[-] Mkengine@feddit.de 7 points 10 months ago

If other services like kagi can offer better results they should be able as well, right?

[-] ClassyHatter@sopuli.xyz 10 points 10 months ago

I think it's simply a question of what are Google's interests. Users doesn't pay anything to Google for the service, so that's not where Google's interests are. Advertisers pay Google, so that's where Google's interests are. Google has no interests to make the search better for users, they want to make it better for advertisers.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] dunz@feddit.nu 19 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I use Qwant for my searches. I find the results better than DDG. https://www.qwant.com/

[-] rdri@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Thanks for your visit
Unfortunately we are not yet available in your country.

And no way to set my country.

[-] affiliate@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

you could set your country with a vpn 😎

[-] rdri@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

That's less than optimal, for a website that is to be used as a search engine.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Got_Bent@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

Whoa. I did a search that would inevitably bring nothing but sponsored bullshit on Google - "best tires"

My results were cartalk, consumer reports, cnet, and the consumer insider.

Nary a national chain trying to sell me something in sight.

[-] slumberlust@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

Aren't all of those sites just more adverts masquerading as information?

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

That's the biggest problem, can't even get straight data and ads separately. Now the articles are the ads, and SEO/adspace has made search results even less useful.

[-] asteriskeverything@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

Comments are the ads now too.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] baseless_discourse@mander.xyz 6 points 10 months ago

I think they got removed from privacy guide unfortunately.

https://github.com/privacyguides/privacyguides.org/pull/342

I want to support a European based service, but unfortunately I have to stick with DDG for now.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] sinokon@feddit.de 13 points 10 months ago

I’m surprised in most posts I’ve read about this there wasn’t a mention of Yacy which is a P2P distributed indexer / search engine. It heavily focuses on privacy. I’ve used it in the past and it worked great for my use cases to bypass censorship. It’s still actively developed after all the years. Would definitely recommend it or try it out as an replacement. The installation and usage is fairy simply.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 11 points 10 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


No, it's not just you - search engine results really are getting worse as the internet is flooded with low-effort garbage from SEO farms and affiliate link sites, a group of German researchers has concluded.

After pouring over countless links for the past year, the team has concluded everyone complaining about Google's declining quality seems to be correct, and things are probably only going to get worse with the advent of generative AI - just like we predicted.

Along with that, the researchers determined that all three search engines are prone to being gamed by large-scale affiliate link spam campaigns, and their efforts to subvert such manipulation through algorithm updates have, at best, "a temporary positive effect."

Google even claimed in 2022 that it was updating its algorithm to prioritize "people-first content," but as the researchers found, those efforts have been in vain as SEO experts and spam factories have simply figured out how to game the newest tweaks to the system.

Janek Bevendorff, research assistant at Leipzig University and an author on the paper, told The Register that it's hard to say whether there's an easy way out of the current online search predicament in which we find ourselves.

"Affiliate marketing itself is in part responsible for what online content looks like now," Bevendorff said, but noted that "banning it entirely is probably not a solution," as many authentic sites use the tactic, and SEO optimization, as an important revenue stream.


The original article contains 748 words, the summary contains 242 words. Saved 68%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[-] lntl@lemmy.ml 9 points 10 months ago

FCC should impose regulations on search providers to make searching with Google's competition more cumbersome and less useful. You know, 'level the playing field'

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Kraiden@kbin.social 9 points 10 months ago

What is everyone else using instead?

[-] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 32 points 10 months ago

I use DuckDuckGo, you can configure it as your default search engine in Firefox.

[-] Z3k3@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

I find myself hitting the same issues with ddg as with Google. The 1st page trys to sell me the thing I want info on

[-] tiredofsametab@kbin.social 7 points 10 months ago

I find google better than ddg the vast majority of the time... and google sucks

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Kraiden@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I use DDG when coding and generally find it to be a bit nicer, but from the article it sounds like they're prone to the same issues. Anecdotally, I have noticed non-code queries do seem to be similarly crap

ETA: You can set it as default in Chrome too, under Settings -> Search Engine

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] gullible@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

Searx. That it doesn’t ignore operators legitimately arouses me slightly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] Steve@communick.news 7 points 10 months ago
[-] cozy_agent@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

I use DDG like others have mentioned, but I also like Perplexity, because it's not a chat like ChatGPT, it just answers queries without trying too hard to chat to you.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2024
669 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

59379 readers
2364 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS