51
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

Correct, but Starbucks doesn't market to children, Logan Paul's demographic he is marketing to is kids 8-12 years old.

[-] CoderKat@lemm.ee 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Why do they compare it to coke as if coke has a lot of caffeine? It's apparently 200 mg total, which is the same as you'd get from a large coffee in many places (and also a common size for caffeine pills).

I think the risk simply depends on if people understand how much caffeine that is, since they have to regulate their consumption like you would with coffee. Which ironically isn't actually something you have to do with most energy drinks, cause most are significantly less caffeine than coffee.

Logan Paul sucks ass, but as long as it's very clearly labeled, I don't see how this is a problem. And honestly, even then, it's not like Starbucks clearly labels "tall coffee has 260 mg caffeine" (I mean, it's on their website, but I don't believe it's prominently on the menu or cups or anything).

[-] YoBuckStopsHere@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Paul is targeting it at children, that is the issue.

[-] themeatbridge@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I had never heard of Prime until a few weeks ago, but my son was at a 10 year old birthday party where the kids were all raving about how great it is.

There's a "sports drink" version that does not have caffeine, and is basically coconut water and sucralose. It tastes like shit, but kids will drink anything that's sweetened and trendy.

I had no idea there was also a caffeinated version, but the kids were talking about their favorite flavors and it wouldn't surprise me if some of the parents bought that shit without realizing what it is.

[-] zzzz@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

And a grande blonde roast from Starbucks contains more than 10 times the caffeine of a can of Coke.

[-] unicron@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Meanwhile the Cocaine energy drink is available on Amazon with 280mg of caffeine.

[-] HnuWETqkp4YG@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

For 8 years I was drinking 5-6 monster energy (160mg each) drinks per day. Then for 2 years 3-5 Bangs per day (300mg each). In an effort to reduce intake and save money, I switched to 200mg caffeine pills. 0-2 pills per day with plenty of water. Savings are about $200 per month and I feel better than before

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

If you ever quit cold turkey, your headache will probably last a week.

[-] HnuWETqkp4YG@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I haven't gotten any headaches in any of the 2-3 day abstinence spells. But I sleep nearly non stop on those days

[-] Tigbitties@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

My kid is constantly asking me for this swill. He's 10yo.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2023
51 points (100.0% liked)

politics

18894 readers
2876 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS