yeah... I'm not going to blame nobody for not wanting to read that article...
That's rare, a triple negative. So, who are you going to blame for not wanting to read the article?
Graphic details about Donald Trump’s alleged “sexual proclivities” have emerged in the latest round of court documents containing details of late paedophile Jeffrey Epstein’s associates. The new documents contain “incendiary claims” about the former president, including accusations that he had sexual relations with “many girls”, made by one of Epstein’s alleged victims, Sarah Ransome. Mr Trump’s name has appeared a handful of times previously in the documents and, while not accusing him of wrongdoing, appears to illustrate the good relationship he had with the disgraced financier. In the newly unsealed documents, Ms Ransome testified that her unnamed friend “was one of the many girls that had sexual relations with Donald Trump” – including at Epstein’s New York townhouse. - TV-MA, 61 mins
SD, SHD, UHD, Dolby Vision; Dolby Stereo, Dolby Surround, Dolby Atmos
Mmh I'm pretty sure having sex with many girls will just be seen as a cool thing for the kind of people who vote for him.
I would clarify that the victims were trafficked and often children, but his supporters are notorious for cherry-picking, and their favorite book (allegedly) is full of that and more, anyhow. So, yeah, you're probably right. 🤦🏽♂️
Are we surprised?
Not really, it's been well known he's fucked kids for almost 30 years.
But how much weight dos the word of another dead pedo actually have?
That's why he's dead in the first place
Surprised? We've already had corroborating depositions for years that he violently raped preteens at Epstein's.
they're demonstrating again that nobody actually cares about this sort of thing
Speak for yourself
If I was in a room with Trump and a hammer...
They mean anybody that supports the guy isn't going to care about this. It's why people like him accuse his opponents of something he's guilty of doing so that when his scandal comes out, people think it's either old news or "a Dem witch hunt"
The men who support him also support this behavior. It's part of why they support him.
Now, let's tie him to Epstein's "suicide"...
I think if he got charged with murder, I might just dissolve into a puddle of happiness.
What about the pee?
If something like that happened he was probably tricked into being filmed cheering on hookers defiling a bed the Obamas slept in. Very common KGB tactic to hire hookers to lead on powerful people until they do something they don't want public. Doubt he actually has a pee fetish.
There's a lot more evidence he wanted to or actually did have sex with underage girls.
I mean, that's a CIA tactic too, at least if we learn anything from history
¿Por que no los dos?
I came for the pee (heh) and goddamit i want to read about the pee
Spoiler: the P just stands for Pedo
Meidas Touch found and produced a contemporaneous news article a few days back that Trump was "dating" one of Epstein's victims, Anouska De Georgiou in 1997. Seems more than a small coincidence.
Still a lot of so called Christians out there say he's God man with a straight face....
those people are sinners dude
Will anything happen to trumpy boy ? I doubt it. The rich and powerful can get away will anything. crying in middle class
I don't care if he likes to be peed on or whatever, but seriously try to imagine saying this to someone
she told me how he kept going on about how he liked her ‘pert nipples’,” she testified.
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.