382
submitted 9 months ago by Rapidcreek@lemmy.world to c/world@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 257 points 9 months ago

There's a war going on right now in Ukraine, helping them win it will make Russia launching a next war less likely and further off.

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 137 points 9 months ago

This is exactly what I am thinking as well. Russia is clearly threatening the stability of the EU right now. If the EU wants to send a strong signal against aggression and meddling, it needs support Ukraine in a way that makes it clear to any would-be-adversary, that the EU is willing and capable to defend itself and its allies.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[-] thorcik@lemmy.world 54 points 9 months ago
[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 9 months ago
[-] Rapidcreek@lemmy.world 48 points 9 months ago

Article 5

“The Parties agree that an armed attack against one or more of them in Europe or North America shall be considered an attack against them all and consequently they agree that, if such an armed attack occurs, each of them, in exercise of the right of individual or collective self-defence recognized by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, will assist the Party or Parties so attacked by taking forthwith, individually and in concert with the other Parties, such action as it deems necessary, including the use of armed force, to restore and maintain the security of the North Atlantic area.

Any such armed attack and all measures taken as a result thereof shall immediately be reported to the Security Council. Such measures shall be terminated when the Security Council has taken the measures necessary to restore and maintain international peace and security.'

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] mrfriki@lemmy.world 45 points 9 months ago

My history teacher used to say that over the course of history every generation faces a full scale war that directly impact them. Looking through the last couple of centuries that seems about right. I haven't been in a war yet and I'm a45 years old so, yeah, I'm kinda scared.

This same teacher also used to say that the only "good" thing about a civil war is that the country that faces it nerves goes through another one ever again. Seeing how things are good in the United States now I'm starting to think that this teacher might be wrong.

[-] thedarkfly@feddit.nl 39 points 9 months ago

Yeah, your teacher seemed to deal in absolutes: "it always happens" or "it will never happen again". I think that events can always happen (again) but they don't have to.

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 32 points 9 months ago

Ah, so this history teacher was a Sith Lord!?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] BenadrylChunderHatch@lemmy.world 25 points 9 months ago

Plenty of countries have had multiple civil wars.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] piecat@lemmy.world 15 points 9 months ago

We won't have other one*

*While the generations affected are alive.

Once the living memories are gone it's much harder to prevent, since anyone can argue a stance from a history book.

[-] ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world 11 points 9 months ago

This reminds me of how WWI was at one point known as 'the war to end all wars'.

How fucking naive were the people who really thought that!

[-] thawed_caveman@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

they were hopeful...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Mysteriarch@slrpnk.net 28 points 9 months ago

More money for the death-machine and profits for the shareholders, hurray!

[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 85 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Pacifism is great and all, but Putin clearly shows that you need to be able to defend yourself, if you don't want your rights and your freedom eroded away by foreign interests. Granted, no military will help you defend against threats to your rights from within, but it makes it at least less likely that those threats from within get backing from foreign threats.

[-] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

While I really wish we would do more that Russia loses this war sooner rather than later and their economy is shattered, because that's the only way I see out of this with Putin losing power, I have to say that Putin only got into the powerful position he's in now due to mutual escalation for decades. This includes permanent provocations by NATO versus Russia. NATO is a bunch of warmongering pieces of shit, but Putin was so fucking stupid that he basically made the biggest PR campaign that NATO could ever have wished for, and now everyone wants to suck off Jens piece of shit Stoltenberg.

I despise NATO with every fibre of my being, yet I am fully aware that the stupid fucks have played their cards well enough that now even I see the need for a total econominal crushing of Russia. Only with a regime change we could then try to help the next Russian regime with humanitarian aid to prevent famines etc.

[-] Wodge@lemmy.world 51 points 9 months ago

I want bootlickers to leave. Putin got into power because he was behind a terrorist attack that was blamed on Chechens and he was already a hardline anti Chechnya candidate, it propelled him to power. It was nothing to do with NATO. Countries bordering Russia have chosen to join NATO because Russia is a fuckawful neighbour.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Quacksalber@sh.itjust.works 46 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Not only did Putin do excellent PR for NATO, Putin absolutely validated NATO's entire existence. Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania would not be free, indepedent countries today without NATO. They certainly wouldn't be supporting Ukraine as much as they have. And say what you will about individual countries, but NATO is proving itself once more a defensive pact. With people dying to rocket debris in Poland, russian drones going down in Romania, US drones being downed and UK planes being shot at over international waters, NATO would have plenty of reasons, if they wanted to escalate their rhetoric towards Putin. But they didn't, because NATO isn't interested in becoming an active participant in this war.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] digeridoo@lemmy.ml 29 points 9 months ago

That's bullshit and a cop-out. Every country in NATO joined willingly because every country should have some level of self-determination. NATO grew because decade after decade, the Russian government proved that they act in bad faith in nearly every interaction with the international community.

Maybe if Russia acted in good faith and was willing to be a partner in the region, neighboring countries wouldn't have felt the need to join NATO, but here we are.

Pacifism doesn't work. We've seen it time and time again that it just buys our adversaries time, and we end up where we're at today.

load more comments (6 replies)
[-] hungryphrog 14 points 9 months ago

You would join NATO too if you had Putler glued to your ass. We're fucking terrified here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 33 points 9 months ago

This is not Iraq. This is a dictatorship invading democracies. I protested the same as you did, we lost the conservatives won. That doesn't mean this is our second chance.

[-] fiah@discuss.tchncs.de 33 points 9 months ago

you're right, we should just let the aggressors take everything, that way nobody has to die

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] lurch@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 months ago

You could be a shareholder, too. I am.

[-] Mysteriarch@slrpnk.net 15 points 9 months ago

I don't have nor do I want shares in the arms industry. I'm not a fucking ghoul.

[-] 768@sh.itjust.works 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I bet your bank has though (likely not your fault).

[-] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 8 points 9 months ago

I don't know how you can say that. Own any index funds? Have a pension or 401k?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[-] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 9 months ago
[-] Suoko@feddit.it 13 points 9 months ago

The usual money flow. What future generation will be able to stop these should-be-retired chiefs?

[-] sebinspace@lemmy.world 24 points 9 months ago

And into the apocalypse we go

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 23 points 9 months ago

Oh no not again

[-] hungryphrog 14 points 9 months ago
[-] Ansis@iusearchlinux.fyi 11 points 9 months ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] pan_troglodytes@programming.dev 10 points 9 months ago

thanks Germany!

[-] SwarovskiYh78@futurology.today 7 points 9 months ago

We are already paying for 2 wars, nothing new

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
382 points (100.0% liked)

World News

38830 readers
1998 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS