140
submitted 10 months ago by Hegar@kbin.social to c/asklemmy@lemmy.world

Interpret improvements as you like. For me it's any large scale reforms or legislative packages designed to improve the country for all or see to the material interests of the majority without overly benefiting the elite.

Any big consumer protection, environmental, infrastructure, or other legislation from Clinton onwards that materially improved the lives of all?

Obamacare and the medicaid expansion comes to my mind. It has obviously improved people's lives but considering how broken the healthcare system remains, and that it was written by the insurance industry to undermine single-payer, it seems to me a mitigated win at best.

Gay marriage and marijuana legalisation but that was the courts and the states although i'm sure the federal government could've stood in the way had they chosen to.

I've only live here since the 2010s so that's all I can think of.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 79 points 10 months ago

The inflation reduction act is probably the most significant piece of climate change policy in American history and is expected to bring emissions to a little under half 2005 levels.

Also, I think it capped insulin prices at $35 a month? That was the hope anyway.

[-] murvillian@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago

I'll be paying 380 ish bucks for insulin this coming month, only using my "good, professional job" type insurance to cover some of the cost. It's around 200/mo. Cheaper to buy from Walmart directly without insurance than it is to process it through it at my required pharmacy. I don't know if the insulin caps have taken effect, or if I don't qualify, all I know is I'm getting screwed because I'm alive and want to stay that way.

The rest of the policy seems cool, but won't be if it pans out like the insulin crap.

[-] Lauchs@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago

Goddamn, America you never cease to find new ways to disappoint me.

It seems to vary state by state, though also for anyone on medicaid/medicare. You might be screwed by that professional job insurance!

I dunno if it helps but some googling took me to this diabetes resource Which seemed pretty good. Might be worth checking as this seems like stuff you have to look into vs having it happen automatically because why not screw us one more time?

[-] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Americans just won't help them goddamn selves. The same people who piss and moan about socialized medicine are chapping at the bit to install the orange shitbag as a dictator. These people are dead set on being rotten to the core.

[-] gothic_lemons@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Not all of us! But yeah.. idk what some of are thinking

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

Not all of us!

Not even MOST of us. Trump lost the popular vote in both Presidential elections he was in.

[-] Toes@ani.social 10 points 10 months ago

Someone tried to explain this to me once. They said that the original formulas for insulin are really cheap, it's just the manufacturers have all agreed to only make the expensive formulas to maximize profits since it's not in their best interest otherwise.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 6 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

It only applies to Medicare recipients ... which is better than nothing I suppose.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The $35/month in the IRA goes into effect for Medicare part D jan 1st. So at the moment, it has not kicked in and you apprently do not qualify.

However, it spurred the biggest insulin producers to cap insulin prices to $35 for most everyone, including people on private insurance, starting Jan 1st.. This is undoubtedly to prevent regulation forcing them to reduce prices, but it will likely stick due to that threat.

So congrats, you should be saving $165/month starting in a few days.

[-] MightEnlightenYou@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Here in Sweden insulin is free. Although we have universal healthcare most medical things cost a little, up to about $230/year then any medication or procedure is free.

Insulin, and related equipment and so on, doesn't even cost a little for the patient here and is completely free. It does of course cost our government and taxpayers money, our government pays about $0.09 per person per day for insulin.

[-] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 68 points 10 months ago

Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (2010) - which among other things created the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and put in place the Volcker Rule which forbids banks from making certain risky investments with depositors money. To give you an idea of the power of the Volcker Rule, when it went in place banks begged (and got) a 5 year delay to divest for investments that violate the rule. Yeah, banks were playing fast-and-loose with with the money you deposited in your checking and savings accounts for their own gain. The Volcker Rule stopped (most) of that.

[-] ringwraithfish@startrek.website 32 points 10 months ago

Didn't Dodd-Frank get gutted a bit in recent years?

[-] Odelay42@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Parts of it were repealed in 2018 under trump and the Republicans.

I don't know what the effects of the rollback were.

[-] Hegar@kbin.social 4 points 10 months ago

Yeah, Dodd occurred to me but I had vague recollections of a recent gutting as well.

[-] PatFussy@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

This is such a cope, we had glass steagall.. we had everything from this dodd frank already but decided only parts of it were worthwhile. It only took the fucking 2008 crash to decide we need 'some' oversight of banking speculation. We STILL dont have something to replace glass steagall. To say that dodd frank is good is like having diharhea in your bed wiped off and calling it clean.

[-] krakenx@lemmy.world 67 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

SOPA/PIPA

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stop_Online_Piracy_Act

That bill would have completely destroyed the internet. Democrats and republicans alongside Hollywood faught the American people and lost. It's the only time I've seen the people actually win, and pretty much every individual regardless of their other politics was united against it. It's debatable if we could have done it without Google and the rest of big tech helping though. But still, it sent a clear message across the entire political spectrum that there was a line they couldn't cross.

We also briefly won Net Neutrality ( https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality ), and although it's no longer in effect, the ISPs would have probably done a lot worse if they didn't know we cared and are watching.

Honestly though, I don't know if stopping things from getting a lot worse should even count as an "improvement".

[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

Honestly though, I don't know if stopping things from getting a lot worse should even count as an "improvement".

It shouldn't. It's a very low bar for a modern country.

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 10 months ago

And by now we have so many worse threats to free communication on the Internet than the copyright industry, yet the Internet is nowhere near as united against any of them as in 2012. On the contrary, everyone now calls for censorship of the other side's "misinformation", "hate speech", content "harmful to minors", etc etc.

[-] Agrivar@lemmy.world 5 points 10 months ago

the other side's "misinformation", "hate speech", content "harmful to minors"

I hate to be "that guy," but c'mon! Only ONE side is responsible for 99.999% of that.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 40 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

HIPAA

The legalization of gay marriage

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

I’d add Americans With Disabilities Act — though I don’t think it’s enforced enough.

[-] Drusas@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

I think that was passed in 1990.

[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago

Requiring nutritional information on food

[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago

That was an EU thing.

It was also cheaper for manufacturers to use the same design in both USA and Europe, which made it an easy implementation for the States.

[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

Food companies actually fought the law

[-] themurphy@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Yeah, companies always fight for themselves, and never the customers!

With that change they had to measure what they actually put into the products. That cost money, which is a great reason to discard people's health.

[-] TheGalacticVoid@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago

In terms of visual design, the US labels are so much easier to understand than the EU labels. The EU/international way of labeling food seems like they just copied an Excel spreadsheet.

[-] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 8 points 10 months ago

?? Nutrition labels have been on food my entire life, and I'm almost 50. Has something about them changed in the last 30 years?

[-] Hikermick@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago

It wasn't law until the mid 90's. Ingredients have been around as long as I can remember but not nutritional information

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 23 points 10 months ago

When minimum wage was increased to $7.25/hour (although it should be increased again).

Affordable Care Act

Funding for covid tests and vaccines

Don't know if these count, since they only come from SCOTUS decisions however Congress has not written a law stripping these rights. Right to have a same-sex relationship (2003) Right to marry a same-sex partner (2015) Right to employment while LGBT (2020)

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago

Affordable Care Act is a mixed bag. It brings insurance to the masses, but insurance is a rip off for the most part. ACA is very half baked without providing a Medicare plan buy in (public option) or forcing everyone to purchase their insurance from the exchange to increase benefits and drive prices down.

Personally I wish we just had universal healthcare/Medicare for all in the US. Hopefully I live long enough to see it.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

The ACA isn't the end goal for sure, but it's better than where we were before. Hopefully as people get used to it, we will be more likely to pass a universal healthcare system.

[-] Mathazzar@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago

The problem with the ACA was that it had to make a lot of compromises to get it through with support by Republicans. While the ACA was initially very unpopular, it's become more popular in time (if you discount rebranding efforts like Kentucky Connect being the name of the ACA marketplace there.. Then Kentucky politicians calling ACA broken but Connect good causing Connect to be popular but ACA not in that state).

It was a good effort at getting the foot in the door for universal Healthcare one day, imo.

[-] GlendatheGayWitch@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago

There were also Cash for Clubker programs (although that could've just been state level) that gave people money to buy a newer car with better gas milage to help the environment and keep people from using as much gas.

Stimulus checks at the end of Bush presidency and during covid. As far as I know, those were the first, creating a precedent that the government could sometimes provide financial relief directly to citizens.

[-] krakenx@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Cash for clunkers harmed buyers in the used car market, especially the poor.

[-] Jagger2097@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago

The cares act listed 18 million people out of poverty. When it ended 4 million of them did not fall back into poverty.

[-] Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

I'm hoping that the repeal of Roe vs Wade seals the fate of the republican party. With continued legal action against gerrymandered states, a solidified stance against women's reproductive rights, along with the overt racism I'm optimisticly hoping to see a functional dissolvement of the republican party in it's current form by 2028. The pessimistic side of me is worried about strategic division of the democrats "not wanting Biden" or other short sighted horeshit driving us straight into a hate filled fascist government we can never recover from.

[-] verdantbanana@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

seals the fate of the republican party? the repeal of Roe vs Wade happened on a democrat's watch and on a Catholic one

when was it you saw and heard Biden on tv defending abortion rights and saying is fighting for us? maybe a few times shit is so real he should be on the tv or streaming or something everyday

Biden has rode "I am not Trump." into the ground but people are still supporting him on that fact alone

and Obama who Biden was in the White with wrote policies that harmed the health of the citizens and Trump and then Biden both expanded on while in office https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Family_Smoking_Prevention_and_Tobacco_Control_Act

when has Biden been a champion of healthcare or for cannabis or for gay marriage? dude is Catholic for God's sake and very public about it and his policies and actions in office have reflected this he chose a prosecutor for a vice who openly opposed what he promised on the campaign trail the ones he has went back on like cannabis when he fired all those staffers

and everyone still thinks he is a cannabis champion

being not trump does not make someone a better more qualified candidate

Biden took my right to vote away so this is one of the only outlets

know in this next election it will most likely be Biden vs Trump same as before how could it go differently remember what happened when we were going to have more options

Obama and Biden chained the Green Party candidate to a chair so she could not debate with them and the other major politicians how is that not fascist

[-] Beemoe@sh.itjust.works 12 points 10 months ago

This is one of the dumbest comments I've ever read.

[-] tastysnacks@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago

Its not so much that the comment is dumb, but Verdant Banana thinks we're dumb.

[-] AdamBomb@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 10 months ago

the repeal of Roe vs Wade happened on a democrat's watch and on a Catholic one

The actions of the Supreme Court are completely unrelated to which party occupies the presidency at the time. The two branches are independent of one another.

[-] Dark_Arc@social.packetloss.gg 12 points 10 months ago

The Infrastructure Bill, the CHIPS Act, and the Inflation Reduction Act are huge examples from the Biden presidency.

From those we're getting tons of bridges fixed, Internet upgrades, public transit improvements, research funded for climate change (including locally, Akron received finding for researching alternative polymers that don't rely on oil), domestic security improvements from domestic chip manufacturing, port and airport upgrades, funding to increase the size of EV charging networks, power grid upgrades to help with all of that, labor got a huge boon as all of these bills encourage or require domestic manufacturing, medicare drug negotiation, we're replacing ALL the lead pipes in public water supply lines, more fixes to tax cheats from corporations and rich people, and funds to cleanup superfund sites.

People really don't realize how much Biden has gotten done; especially when compared to other recent presidents ... like Mr. Build A Wall.

The affordable care act while controversial was also very big as you said.

[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

Consumer solar and EV rebates.

[-] xantoxis@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago

i’m sure the federal government could’ve stood in the way had they chosen to.

In fact, they're still trying to, for all three of these things.

But, uh, yeah, it's pretty much those three. The only other big one I can even think of is the crime bill, which is a net evil by a huge margin.

[-] NegativeLookBehind@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

…Have there been any?

this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2023
140 points (100.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

26778 readers
1097 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions

Please don't post about US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS