663
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by Squorlple@lemmy.world to c/memes@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] zanyllama52@infosec.pub 92 points 2 years ago

Confirmed Windows user, lol

[-] Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world 45 points 2 years ago

I’m a Mac user and let me tell you, it could easily be an osx device. Those friggin updates take forever, and can be forced on you with no warning.

[-] M500@lemmy.ml 15 points 2 years ago

Mac updates are weirdly slow.

[-] kautau@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Full Mac updates not only usually update the entirety of the system and then run an SIP check, but often are firmware updates for the hardware, that’s why they now have a separate setup for quick security updates, which often happen in the background, without a full update required: https://support.apple.com/en-us/102657

[-] M500@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 years ago

Thanks! I suspected they were doing something under the hood but they are not as overtly transparent in this process.

[-] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Good info, thanks.

Any idea why it takes so long to install the OS from a fast USB drive (around 45 minutes)? The same drive installs win10 in under 5 minutes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] theUnlikely@sopuli.xyz 4 points 2 years ago

I think you've got a setting wrong. I've got mine set to download only. So it just downloads the update in the background and notifies me. I have even left that notification sitting there for months before without it forcing or nagging me.

[-] Octopus1348@lemy.lol 3 points 2 years ago

You can turn off automatic updates, but it will still give you a notification when there is one so you can make it update at night.

Also, OS X? Is the OS 10.X or you're just referring to it as OS X. Because in newer macOS versions, I can confirm the automatic updates do it at night when you're not using the computer.

[-] Wermhatswormhat@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

Yeah sorry, just meant MacOS! It’s a work computer so I think the IT guys kind of force it sometimes.

[-] halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago

That ignore system messages. This post will be anecdotal, but I can't ever get my systems to suddenly restart or reinstall the bloatware apps like some people claim theirs do. It honestly seems like it's "power users" fucking with things that they don't actually understand, and then complaining that things aren't working the way they expect.

We have 5 Windows 11 systems in our household, and 2 family members that are terrible with computers. None of them act the way some randoms on the Internet claim Windows 11 does with updates all the time. And everyone I personally know doesn't seem to have these issues either. But we're also not installing random patches or messing with settings that don't have a natural and intentional UI element.

All of our systems I help with for family and friends update on their own, and prompt when a restart is needed, including a button to delay the restart. If ignored, it prompts after a day or so again and only if ignored or delayed for an extended period will eventually give a countdown to a forced restart. I only noticed the countdown because I was explicitly trying to reproduce what people online claim about it suddenly restarting while using it. And at that point it WILL restart even in use, but that's after an extended period, multiple days, of ignoring notifications about it.

I also don't have issues on my systems with those annoying bloatware app links (like Candy Crush) reinstalling, etc. on their own. I turned off the various advertising settings in the settings menus and uninstalled the app links like normal. They've never returned.

Since I've been completely unable to reproduce these relatively common complaints on multiple systems myself, I can only assume people are adjusting settings or installing various patches from the Internet that mess with things that aren't intended to be user-facing and that ends up causing issues. Like the infinite number of patches to remove telemetry, etc. that people don't know what's actually being changed by it, but install for privacy.

[-] Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Agreed.
I'm a professional IT tech and see a lot of desktops during the week including my own.
We have some Windows PCs that still had 1809 installed because Windows does not manage to update itself without being forced to search.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

I mostly agree with you. But something like 3 years ago, I remember letting my PC run while I was gathering seats over night. There was no previous "restart now" or even "update now". However, in the morning, I found the PC had restarted too install an update. And that was the standard setting back then. I changed it to only prompt that there are updates since, and AFAIR that setting was "reset" 1 or 2 times ever since in an update.

But seeing how absurdly niche what I do is, I doubt that random users will care. And sadly they need to be forced to update for the sake of all of us.

[-] Sir_Simon_Spamalot@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago

As a Linux user, I cannot relate

[-] Pharmacokinetics@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

As a Windows 10 user who only enabled security updates neither can I.

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 years ago

As an Amish person where am I and how did I get here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] AceTKen@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 years ago

As a Windows user who manually updates weekly and reads changelogs for what actually changes, neither do I.

But then again I don't leave 400,000 items open on my desktop for no reason whatsoever and get mad when I have to close them.

[-] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 54 points 2 years ago

I’m here to make sure most comments here have the word “Linux” in it.

[-] Huschke@lemmy.world 51 points 2 years ago

After switching to Linux a month ago, I can finally participate in the circle jerking:

Forced updates? Haha lol. That's such a Windows user thing to say.

[-] lemmesay@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 2 years ago

> chad GNU/Linux respecting my preferences.
> only updates when I do sudo apt update && sudo apt upgrade.
> finishes updating kernel and 150 packages in less than 5 minutes whilst I'm merging a pr.
> I close computer when I'm done, unaware of updates.
> open it up next day and it starts like nothing happened.
> mfw I read this post

[-] toastal@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

My update failed for some unforeseen bug in the software

nixos-rebuild switch --rollback

Back in business as if nothing happened

[-] xarexyouxmadx@lemmy.world 39 points 2 years ago

Maybe it's because I use Linux but I can't relate (anymore). So glad I'll never have to sit through another forced windows update 😌

[-] hondaguy97386@sh.itjust.works 33 points 2 years ago

Confused in linux?

[-] semnosao@lemmy.eco.br 18 points 2 years ago

linux user be like: loser

[-] Secret300@sh.itjust.works 17 points 2 years ago

I might be a Linux user but Nvidia makes sure it takes forever to boot when there's a new update. Fuck you Nvidia

[-] Sabre363@sh.itjust.works 15 points 2 years ago

Something something Linux user, btw

[-] frobeniusnorm@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

I use linux, but can somewhat relate because i have a weird AM5 motherboard that shows 0-4 minutes of "DRAM ERROR" before posting

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I'm pretty sure that's a bios option. Your ram is retraining for maximum overclock. Turn it off. Live with the 1% slower performance.

[-] frobeniusnorm@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Hate to break it to you, but no. I turned every option regarding cpu or ram overclocking off and it still won't post stable. Doesn't matter, i am a cs phd, so i pretty much start the system in the morning and shut it down before i go to bed, this way i just have to start it before getting coffee :)

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] NENathaniel@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 years ago

As a Windows user, I can't relate lol I don't have this happen to me

[-] VindictiveJudge@startrek.website 11 points 2 years ago

Seriously, does anyone know about the update settings? It's not hard to make Win10 not try to update while you're using it.

[-] hamburglar26@wilbo.tech 4 points 2 years ago

And at least since Win 10 the updates take maybe 5 minutes unless you have held them off for months.

[-] c0mbatbag3l@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's easier to never learn anything and complain that an OS has issues you didn't bother to learn how to overcome.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Trollception@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Never had an update take 2 hours. Maybe if your using a computer from 2005.

[-] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 16 points 2 years ago

I had an update take 3 and half hours on a 2019 laptop with a ryzen 5 3550h, 16gb of ddr4 ram and an nvme ssd.

So I moves to gentoo where if unlucky and qtwebengine needs to comiplie the update takes 5+ hours. 😌

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago

At least now, when you do "update and shut down", it will first restart to actually completely finish the update and then shut down again.

[-] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 years ago

Impressive!

[-] OpenStars@kbin.social 10 points 2 years ago

Computers mostly don't force software updates on you, unless you tell them to. (Caveat: IT routinely forces updates on people.) Find the setting where you specifically asked the machine to keep itself updated, and turn it off. If you can't find it, throw the machine away and get a better one where you can be in control:-P. This concludes my sermon for today, I hope you all have some Happy Holidays!:-P

[-] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 17 points 2 years ago

Windows by default forces updates upon you and makes itbhard to disable them. Or make them ask you for updates.

[-] Eheran@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

And for a good reason too. People need to be opt-out to do them automatically, we know how XP looked like.

[-] OpenStars@kbin.social 3 points 2 years ago

Makes sense - why allow people to administer their own machines? :-P

[-] ComradePedro@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

They do, you can opt-out if you want, but you don't, unless you like malware. Windows is just an unsafe proprietary mess of a system. :-P

[-] crony@lemmy.cronyakatsuki.xyz 2 points 2 years ago

Only way to opt out or chanhe the settings to be better isby either policy edutor or registry editing, both not user frkendly.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] OpenStars@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

I thought some of the older ones, like 2000, were more secure, with ability to access on-chip security features. So ofc they threw all that out in favor of 10, the final OS that would come as a subscription service, meaning that you'd never need to buy one again. And then they threw that out too, in favor of the next one... and on and on it goes:-P.

I absolutely hate Windows:-(.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Dec 2023
663 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

51827 readers
802 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS