272
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by SayJess to c/technology@lemmy.ml

Looking through the history looks a bit suspicious. Even if the questionable bids were removed, it’s still likely to be 100k+ for the username!

Edit: Closer to $15k right now lol.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 0oWow@lemmy.world 118 points 1 year ago

Look at that. An email address that will be instantly added to every spammers list. And they know the owner has money too.

[-] SayJess 41 points 1 year ago

Yikes! I hadn’t thought about that!

[-] moody@lemmings.world 32 points 1 year ago

And they know the owner has money too.

Not after spending 50 mil on it

[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

Anyone willing to spend $50m on an email address probably has more money than sense.

[-] moody@lemmings.world 7 points 1 year ago

Until they spend 50 mil on an email address, then they have an equal amount of both.

[-] DreadPotato@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If that person has a networth of...say, roughly 230 billions...that 50mil isn't even a noticeable change.

[-] gregorum@lemm.ee 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

if you’re wondering who this charity is supporting like I was, they, apparently, haven’t decided yet. but here’s their short list of nominees:

  • Privacy International
  • EPIC
  • Human Rights Foundation
  • Access Now
  • Fight for the Future
  • Tor Project
  • Women Who Code
  • Ranking Digital Rights
  • Qubes OS
  • GrapheneOS

source

[-] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 23 points 1 year ago

Women Who Code might not be a good choice... https://www.vice.com/en/article/g5v53w/girls-who-code-team-up-with-tomahawk-missile-maker-raytheon

But I'm definitely excited to see Tor and Fight for the Future on the list!

[-] hedgehog@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 year ago

Women Who Code and Girls Who Code are different nonprofit organizations.

They’re run by different people and have distinct goals (WWCode: supporting and empowering women who are in the tech industry; GWC is focused on getting more women into tech by providing opportunities to learn programming to girls).

[-] Supermariofan67@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago

Oh okay, my mistake. Thanks for pointing that out

[-] Kusimulkku@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Girlbossing a thirld world school with a tomahawk

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

How is that bad? The girls get a foot into Raytheon that they probably wouldn't anyway, because the industry is sexist. And Raytheon gets to pad their diversity numbers and still have high quality employees.

[-] sheogorath@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I don't want the money I donated to be used for the benefit of the MIC.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

We shouldn’t be glorifying weapons manufacturers. They make things to kill people.

[-] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It's like the hangman problem, but with skill involved... yes they make things that kill people. That's the entire point. Where else do people think their freedom comes from, other than others having to dream up death and destruction. I think broadening their workforce might lead to less damaging ideas, that's the hope usually with these initiatives.

[-] spacecowboy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah you can miss me with that freedom shit.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Qubes! Holy hell, that's a blast from my past. I didn't contribute or anything, to be clear, but I did use it and enjoy it while I did. It's a really interesting way to handle security.

[-] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Its an active project. Likely lots of improvements if you haven't used it for a while.

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 3 points 1 year ago

Past? Still my daily driver and I couldn't imagine anything else.

[-] drislands@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Hell yeah, I'm glad it's worked for you! I capitulated because I wanted to do VR gaming and I couldn't figure out a way to make that work.

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 2 points 1 year ago

Ah, yes. Gaming is something Qubes is not good for lol

I love at least half of those, haven't heard of the rest. Hopefully they donate to a few of them.

[-] treadful@lemmy.zip 64 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It's up to $100m. No shot those bids are legit.

EDIT: Looks like they cleaned up the fraudulent bids. Down to $15k which seems much more... possible.

[-] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago

You can just immediately resell it to Elon for $44B.

[-] theUnlikely@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago

I feel like he's the one bidding.

[-] tsonfeir@lemm.ee 7 points 1 year ago

I think at this point it’s safe to say he’d pay double.

[-] Aradia@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

I doubt he has more money for stuff like this.

Maybe we can have a fundraiser for ol Musky to buy x.

[-] Aradia@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I would prefer to get it for x.org before anything about Musk, he sucks, and I don't want to know anything more about him.

[-] SayJess 21 points 1 year ago

Could be the guy that has been the early adopter of everything, but was not fast enough for ProtonMail. CompuServe, AOL, Xanga—first to ‘x’. Now that he has made his $100,000,350, he can finally afford to get x@pm.me. Or it’s fake. It’s probably fake, but I choose to believe.

[-] PrinceWith999Enemies@lemmy.world 60 points 1 year ago

From their q&a:

gitspamdum is a bot, I just created a fake account and bid for 999 trillions, no verification were requested in the whole process and 1 nanosecond later gitspamdum bid after me, I tried this twice, my only purpose was to expose the absurdity of the whole thing, if Proton really take this thing seriously please just cancel all auctions and place them in a serious website

[-] Crow@lemmy.world 26 points 1 year ago

Personal email domains > generic email domains.

[-] USSEthernet@startrek.website 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I know right. I can go into Proton now and create an x@mydomain.com alias if I want...for free

[-] victron@programming.dev 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jesus, I received the mail just this morning, and I thought "who would bid for that? Lol". I'm actually impressed.

[-] Poppa_Mo@lemmy.world 21 points 1 year ago

Elon is bidding on it against his own alt accounts. There's no way anyone else gets it.

[-] jojo@toast.ooo 19 points 1 year ago

Even if I had enough money to buy this email, I wouldn't. Too many people would try to hack, steal, or buy the account from me. It would be a cool email tho.

Nah, just think of the spam you'd need to wade through.

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 4 points 1 year ago

With that money ($100 million) you could get a custom TLD, so you could own x@x.x

[-] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

I don't think .x is tld. But EM owns x.com, so he could (and may well already have) x@x.com. But I think paying for a name is silly.

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago

With just $185k the ICANN accepts registrations of custom TLDs

Weird that Elon didn't apply for that since he had 44 billion to burn

[-] jojo@toast.ooo 1 points 1 year ago

lol "just email me, my address is xxx"

[-] library_napper@monyet.cc 14 points 1 year ago
[-] eldoom@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago
[-] southsamurai@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago

Lmmfao! That's brilliant.

[-] JoMomma@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago
[-] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

It was about that time...

this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
272 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

35301 readers
127 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS