997
Oh No, anyway (lemmy.world)
all 34 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 86 points 2 years ago

This is just "both sides are equally wrong/bad."

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 41 points 2 years ago

Idk about equally, but often enough, both sides are indeed wrong.

[-] Holzkohlen@feddit.de 32 points 2 years ago

"Enlightened centrists". I make fun of you people constantly.

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

Yes, because you're so blinded by your indoctrination that you can't accept the flaws of "your" side.

[-] ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

“Climate change exists”

“Religion shouldn’t allow governments to prevent basic healthcare needs”

“January 6 was a failed insurrection”

These are the things that the right calls indoctrination.

And the hard left calls not important enough to bother voting.

[-] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 9 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure what you're trying to say here

[-] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

There are leftists that get things wrong

[-] teichflamme@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago

It makes you look stupid tho

[-] SuperSaiyanSwag@lemmy.zip 12 points 2 years ago

Maybe I’m too naive, but I didn’t think they were referring to just politics. They were just referring to two people arguing.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

You know, I think you're right. I'm so used to the phrase "both sides" meaning a specific thing it didn't register as anything else. If it had been phrased "both sides of an argument" I would have understood.

[-] bartolomeo@suppo.fi 1 points 2 years ago

Does it normally refer to politics? Maybe for Americans, and they are responsible for a good deal of the English language content online. Right, and the 2 party system...

I'm with you, though, both sides means both sides of an argument. I think the news had something on that a while back- for every climate scientist they interviewed, they had to also interview a climate denier to present a "fair and balanced" view XD

[-] SuddenDownpour@sh.itjust.works 40 points 2 years ago

Why are y'all in the comments trying to act like one or another universalist position has to fit like a sock to all situations? There are debates where one side is blatantly wrong and the other is blatantly correct, debates where one side is wrong and the other has some points right, debates where both sides have some points right, debates where both sides would do well to return to school and debates where no side can be objetively correct because they're discussing something intrinsically subjective. The "enlightened centrist" meme is useful to mock the stupid position that "the truth is always in the middle", but if you think you're always going to find someone in any debate who has the right answer, you're going to find yourself siding with stupid shit all the time.

[-] rosymind@leminal.space 5 points 2 years ago

Yes! Can we pin this somewhere for new Lemmy users to read? I'm so over the right/wrong ONLY attitudes

[-] ieightpi@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

It would be better if we taught people to be critical thinkers

[-] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 1 points 2 years ago

Differing opinions is not the same thing as misinformation.

[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 26 points 2 years ago
[-] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Monke brain see "both sides"

Neuron fire

CENTRIST DETECTED

no further thought needed

[-] neptune@dmv.social 21 points 2 years ago

Learn about one religion and you may become faithful. Learn about many and you may become an atheist.

There's some truth and some idiocy behind this meme. Just because, for example, the US political system tends toward a two party system, does not mean you can always or always not find some amount of truth or good ideas based on what two parties tell you. In fact, the framing is irrelevant toward truth, and is even it's own type of bias. There are certainly some third rails neither side of a debate will touch, or some things both find the need to lie about. But in some cases someone is sort of right about something and sometimes people are just wrong.

[-] EatYouWell@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Except the right's platform no longer has any aspect of it that's correct. They abandoned the conservative platform ages ago and went full fascist.

[-] Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Be careful careful about arguing that on lemmy.world. I argued for a bit with a "both sides are bad", eventually called them out for being a Putin puppet, and got my post deleted by a Lemmy.world mod.

[-] OurToothbrush@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago

To say nothing of what the Republicans are up to.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 4 points 2 years ago

Not me. I learned about all of them and have accepted them all. It's exhausting.

[-] bstix@feddit.dk 3 points 2 years ago

When Orion aligns with cup noodle. Ramen, my brother. May Prince Phillip have mercy on your Chūnjié and bless your virgins in Ragnarok.

[-] sus@programming.dev 2 points 2 years ago

Or a syncretist.

[-] Bipta@kbin.social 17 points 2 years ago
[-] banneryear1868@lemmy.world 16 points 2 years ago

both sides

wtf did u just say to me u lil bishh

[-] hakunawazo@lemmy.world 13 points 2 years ago

Can't you just live normally in a filter bubble like the rest of us?

[-] Aabbcc@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago

Yup my current favorite combo is hexbear and the neolibs at /r/Destiny. Completely ideologically opposed on nearly all issues. I usually side more with the hexbear crowd but they also have their own bubble thing going on

[-] Fleur__@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Why limit yourself to two?

[-] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Fires up the grill

this post was submitted on 14 Dec 2023
997 points (100.0% liked)

Memes

51788 readers
1089 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS