Rules of thumb can be very useful for a relatively inexperienced programmer, and once you understand why they exist you can choose to ignore them when they would get in the way. Clean Code is totally unhinged though
is-number is a one-line function. (though it's debatable if a function that complex should be compressed to one line)
You may have heard of a similar if more extreme "microdependency" called is-even. When you use an NPM package, you also need all the dependencies of that package, and the dependencies of those dependencies recursively. Each package has some overhead, eventually leading to this moment in time.
I tried to edit the 'highlights' into a single image, the top is the description of the PR, the middle is a comment replying to another comment
even if you write in assembly, you still may not actually understand what is going on in the machine since processors convert the instructions to "micro-ops", and let's not forget hardware bugs like those caused by speculative execution
I managed to recreate almost the same screenshot in 5kb (and with much less compression artifacts!)
before adding the text and circles it was only 1.6kb
it's a case where jpeg compression ironically results in the picture getting 60x larger and more blurry because everyone recompresses the images and jpeg is designed for large photos and not pixel art
driver is john cena, who has the catchphrase "you can't see me"
To save even more data, replace every symbol with A. Then just store the amount of As.
I'm pretty sure that "motorcycle airbag vest" is not considered a standard piece of safety equipment by law
Harambe is dead. Harambe remains dead. And we have killed him.
I would guess that, after working on perfecting a song for weeks or months, it feels very weird to completely change it in 2 minutes by applying 2-3 transforms/filters and releasing that as a separate version
looking at wikipedia it seems that there's even been research about the concept:
Binghamton University did a study on undergraduates from a midsize university in the northeastern United States. There were 562 participants with 305 identified as female and 257 as male. Of the 562 participants, 427 were exclusively heterosexual while 113 were not exclusively heterosexual. The participants were asked "Have you ever friend-zoned someone else?" and "Have you ever been friend-zoned?" The study found that 65.7% of exclusively heterosexual males have friend-zoned someone while 92.6% of exclusively heterosexual females have friend-zoned someone. The study also found that 75.2% of exclusively heterosexual males have been friend-zoned before while only 41.2% of exclusively heterosexual females have been friend-zoned before
unless the participants got severely misled about what the term means, I think this shows the idea is not going away any time soon
(also I just noticed, this was posted to an "antique memes" community)
but sometimes "๐๐ฝ".reverse() == "๐ฝ๐"