193
submitted 11 months ago by legend_sandworm@lemmy.cafe to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

Meta charges up to €251.88 per year to respect the fundamental right to privacy of EU users. This is a violation of the GDPR.

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 59 points 11 months ago

Are Meta even committing to stop tracking when users pay? Or are they simply not showing targeted ads but still totally tracking?

[-] LWD@lemm.ee 18 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)
[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 11 points 11 months ago

More notably, what it also does not mean is "we will stop collecting it"...

[-] RvTV95XBeo@sh.itjust.works 10 points 11 months ago

Follow-up question, does paying for Facebook do anything about tracking & ads run by Meta outside of their ecosystem?

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago

I literally cant believe them. And would not pay a cent. Meanwhile I donate all the time to peertube, lemmy, mastodon, etc

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 months ago

I think that, at least for users out of the EU, the only alternative will be to change to the i2p network or to use more extensions and scripts than bookmarks in the browser to avoid this surveillance crap of these data hogs "to make America great again" I only hope that in the future the EU becomes a little more alert in offering enough software and services to be on level eyes of those in the USA. There are very good products in the EU, but most of them little known and marginal, the few that have made a name for themselves are KDE, Proton, Tuta and Vivaldi, little else..

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 1 points 11 months ago

I was into i2p once. Poorly its like nearly not developed it seemy, there still is no install-and-run Browser like Torbrowser. And the lack of exit nodes makes it really impractical

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Well, it's still poorly used, but this can change in the future with logical improvements. Decentralized products are always poor if there are only few which use it, above with shabby servers. But a decentralized network is at the end the only way to escape the control of these surveillance companies. Tor in the Onion network isn't really free of this and controled with backdoors by the NSA and others (the Onion was developed by US Defense and Secrete services), entering only with TOR, without also using VPN with several server redirects (startet before starting TOR, to get the tunnel beginning from the VPN server and not from the one of your ISP. Because of this a VPN extension in the browser isn't a so good idea, only can start after the browser connect to your ISP server), expose you. very fast, not only by the gov services, also by the fauna maligna there. The TOR browser isn' specially secure, it is only a browser capable to access the TOR network. In the normal open network isn't more private as FF or any other browser, only slower and less compatible with the current web standarts, it is for what it is.

[-] Pantherina@feddit.de 2 points 11 months ago

Yes VPN browser extensins are BS just as Proxies just within the browser I would say. All that nice stuff Firefox offers should just be done on the OS level with systemd resolved.

But the Tor network is not controlled by the NSA. The NSA is in ways also just a security agency. Tor is open source. Its very likely that the NSA, China, Russia etc. run their own servers though.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 2 points 11 months ago

They are also in the Onion, more nowadays because of Terrorism and the current wars, its anyway a web which you must take with a grain of salt, not only because of its fauna.

[-] MrOxiMoron@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

They claim to not track you then, but just to be sure I finally took the step and deleted both Facebook and Instagram.

Kinda sucks, because those are the platformed I used mostly to keep informed about local events and businesses.

[-] TheHobbyist@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 months ago

Where do they claim that?

The article from Facebook I found about the subscriptions is this one: https://about.fb.com/news/2023/10/facebook-and-instagram-to-offer-subscription-for-no-ads-in-europe/

The only relevant thing I saw related to the topic was "while people are subscribed, their information will not be used for ads". It does not say that information will stop being collected. Just that it will not be used for ads.

So by all interpretations, there is in fact no suggestion that they will stop tracking paid users.

[-] phase@lemmy.8th.world 8 points 11 months ago

Given that the average phone has 35 apps installed, keeping your phone private could soon cost around € 8,815 a year.

Nice argument they found.

[-] Gooey0210@sh.itjust.works 2 points 11 months ago

Only I have like 100+ apps installed? 🫣

[-] phase@lemmy.8th.world 1 points 11 months ago

It's like math at school. You prove the minimum isn't sustainable. You don't care for how far things go. If the minimum isn't viable the rest isn't either.

this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2023
193 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

31921 readers
693 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS