323
submitted 2 years ago by ZeroCool@feddit.ch to c/news@lemmy.world
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stifle867@programming.dev 156 points 2 years ago

This could have been prevented if there was a good toddler with a gun.

[-] squaresinger@feddit.de 64 points 2 years ago

The toddlers need gun training. If every toddler had a gun, stuff like this wouldn't happen.

[-] Diplomjodler@feddit.de 27 points 2 years ago

The solution is obviously to try toddlers as adults.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Another opportunity to talk to your toddler about good trigger discipline.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] Artyom@lemm.ee 32 points 2 years ago

Or if we just had mental health programs for toddlers, we wouldn't have any issues with giving toddlers guns!

[-] the_q@lemmy.world 74 points 2 years ago

Another responsible gun owner!

[-] tetris11@lemmy.ml 29 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Sad thing is is that there are probably many responsible gun owners, but its the jackasses that get publicized and drawn into the public eye.

Though, that's how it should be. It just takes one reckless owner to ruin several people's lives. That's an incredibly low margin of error, and people should talk about it.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 7 points 2 years ago

Current estimates say there are 475 million guns in the US and around 330 million people. About 1.5 guns per person on average.

You just never hear about the responsible gun owners. ;)

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] marx2k@lemmy.world 60 points 2 years ago
[-] Buffalox@lemmy.world 35 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Since when did USA become so anti freedom?
The toddler is clearly part of a militia, to prevent government oppression.
So he has every right to carry and fire whatever weapon in whichever place and direction he chooses.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Meant something different back then.

[-] dangblingus@lemmy.world 6 points 2 years ago

Evidently. If this is what people call "well-regulated" these days....

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[-] randombullet@feddit.de 57 points 2 years ago

Needs to be changed to negligent discharge.

There are no accidents, just negligence.

Unless there is hardware failure, but that's a different story

[-] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Sorry... you think letting a toddler get ahold of your loaded gun isn't child endangerment?

[-] echodot@feddit.uk 34 points 2 years ago

that the 2-year-old boy took her Taurus 9mm firearm from her purse

Right, so the safety was off then, because there's no way that a two-year-old could release the safety on their own. The movies make it look like you just flick it with your finger but seriously that thing does not move without a reasonable around a force.

[-] jordanlund@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago

A Taurus 9mm likely has a trigger pull between 5 and 9 pounds and kiddo did that...

https://www.guns.com/news/reviews/taurus-g2c-best-seller

Of course mom could have modified it to reduce the trigger pull too...

[-] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 years ago

As a victim of a toddler pinch I have no doubt they can pull a trigger.

[-] theyoyomaster@lemmy.world 8 points 2 years ago

Many modern pistols don’t have safeties. Either way it shouldn’t have been loose in the purse and not in a holster.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Fedizen@lemmy.world 24 points 2 years ago

ohio, the florida of the northeast.

[-] Chainweasel@lemmy.world 14 points 2 years ago

As an Ohioan, I've been calling it "Cold Florida" for years.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] ShunkW@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago

Of course it was in Waverly. That Walmart is always full of insane people who shouldn't have weapons, but you know they do. Used to pass through on my way to my hometown and refused to stop there after a few incidents with good old boys because I'm a gay dude who had very long hair back then.

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 12 points 2 years ago

I'm not sure any of those things are unique to that particular Walmart.

[-] CmdrShepard@lemmy.one 8 points 2 years ago

I live on the other side of the country and this has been my experience with every Walmart I've ever visited.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] aeronmelon@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago

I understand, but you've described greater than half of all Walmarts.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 16 points 2 years ago

This sounds about right for a Taurus owner.

[-] negativeyoda@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Not a gun person. Is that the Karen gun or something?

[-] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 18 points 2 years ago

Taurus, and this model in particular, is known as a cheap piece of shit probably purchased and carried by someone lacking intellect and sophistication... You know, the type who would have the thing sloshing around unattended in a purse, with no holster.

[-] JAC@reddthat.com 12 points 2 years ago

I thought it was about the Ford Taurus. Lol

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 12 points 2 years ago

It's a good thing that Toddler had a gun! Imagine if a gunman had decided to shoot up that Wal Mart! The Toddler could Protect itself!

That boar population is outta control, huh?

[-] ivanafterall@kbin.social 11 points 2 years ago

"Accidentally."

[-] GreenMario@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2023
323 points (100.0% liked)

News

31447 readers
3003 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS