The story of McDonalds in Denmark is a fun example of this if anyone wants to read. [1]

McDonalds decided not to follow the union agreement and thus set up its own pay levels and work rules instead. This was a departure, not just from what Danish companies did, but even from what other similar foreign companies did. For example, Burger King, which is identical to McDonalds in all relevant respects, decided to follow the union agreement when it came to Denmark a few years earlier.

In late 1988 and early 1989, the unions decided enough was enough and called sympathy strikes in adjacent industries in order to cripple McDonalds operations. Sixteen different sector unions participated in the sympathy strikes.

Dockworkers refused to unload containers that had McDonalds equipment in them. Printers refused to supply printed materials to the stores, such as menus and cups. Construction workers refused to build McDonalds stores and even stopped construction on a store that was already in progress but not yet complete. The typographers union refused to place McDonalds advertisements in publications, which eliminated the company’s print advertisement presence. Truckers refused to deliver food and beer to McDonalds. Food and beverage workers that worked at facilities that prepared food for the stores refused to work on McDonalds products.

Once the sympathy strikes got going, McDonalds folded pretty quickly and decided to start following the hotel and restaurant agreement in 1989.

This is why McDonalds workers in Denmark are paid $22 per hour.

[1] https://mattbruenig.com/2021/09/20/when-mcdonalds-came-to-denmark/

Tinfoil hat time: they do know. They are attempting to normalize the U.S. model in Europe to drive down labor costs.

Had that happen when working for Symantec in Argentina. They wouldn't do cost of living adjustments to account for the 30% inflation so the government forced a union on us. All they asked for was to give us the same salary, accommodating for inflation--in the end, this comes to the same dollar amount per employee. As best I can tell, the business bros couldn't understand inflation and exchange rates and they decided to simply lay off several hundred people and close their offices in the county entirely. Little did they know that you can't do that in Argentina and pretty much every single person sued, myself included, and won two year's salary, minus lawyer fees. If they had simply kept paying the same number of dollars to everyone, they'd have saved tens of millions of dollars.

So why work there in the first place? Why bother with a strike? Quit and work some place with better conditions.

Labor has a modicum of self respect in Sweden, it’s nice to see an example being set by a group other than the very most blatantly abused, such as our nurses and automotive in the states.

Are you suggesting that America use its Navy to enforce, by force, a resolution of the labor dispute in favor of Tesla?

This isn't the 1700s, you know.

To what end?

Well, if they don't play by Swedish rules they aren't going to be allowed at the table. And the Swedish unions are the ones enforcing that.

It's not insignificant. It's Tesla's 5th biggest in Europe and Tesla's were making up 60% of new car sales in Sweden.

Problem for Tesla is even if they pull out of the market all the cars they already sold will need servicing. So the mechanics union will strike and demand a collective bargaining agreement, then what choice does Tesla have?