132
Yes, Ubuntu Is Withholding Security Patches for Some Software (www.flu0r1ne.net)
submitted 10 months ago by pnutzh4x0r@lemmy.ndlug.org to c/linux@lemmy.ml
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] stealthnerd@lemmy.world 96 points 10 months ago

TLDR: Ubuntu Pro offers additional security patches to packages found in the universe repo. Universe is community maintained so Ubuntu is essentially stepping in to provide critical CVE patches to some popular software in this repo that the community has not addressed.

I suppose it depends on how you look at it but I don't really see this as withholding patches. Software in this repo would otherwise be missing these patches and it's a ton of work for Ubuntu to provide these patches themselves.

Now is they move glibc to universe and tell me to subscribe to get updates I'll feel differently.

[-] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 47 points 10 months ago

Yeah, I think Canonical is full of crap, but in this context, what they're doing is justified.

This article is clickbait.

[-] Bitrot@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 10 months ago

The title is. The article itself is pretty generous.

[-] GenderNeutralBro@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 10 months ago

How does this compare to other distros?

Debian includes ffmpeg, for example, in the main stable repo. Given Debian's reputation, I would think they are including these security patches in a timely manner, though I'm not entirely sure how to compare specific patches to verify this.

Of course, everything changes when you are selling support contracts. Canonical and Red Hat are the big two for enterprise because they provide support.

When I was last running Ubuntu on desktop, I signed up for an account and enabled these extra security updates. Yeah, it's "free", but it requires jumping through hoops. Requiring an account to get patches is the kind of user-hostile design pattern I expect from Apple or Google, but not in the desktop Linux world.

[-] AProfessional@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Nobody else has this hybrid model. RHEL is a paid distro in general. Most others are just free entirely. They all patch CVEs when they can. Ubuntu doesn’t write all of their patches or anything.

[-] dan@upvote.au 7 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Ubuntu and Debian are essentially the same here.

Debian's contrib repo, which is the equivalent of Ubuntu's universe repo, doesn't get security updates from the Debian security team, as it's not considered an official part of Debian. Package maintianers have to provide security updates. https://www.debian.org/security/faq#contrib

The difference is that Ubuntu provide paid support for contrib packages, including patches. Debian doesn't have any official paid support options.

[-] aev@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 10 months ago

No, they aren't. You can switch to their Universe patches anytime, at your own risk. If you want Canonical to mitigate that risk for you, you pay. Simple, really.

[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 20 points 10 months ago

Frankly this isn't terrible. I'm sure there was a valid reason.

Oh snap

[-] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 14 points 10 months ago

JFC, this misinformation again...

[-] GustavoM@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

You guys 'member when security patches were (freely) given away, for free, without asking nothing back?

I 'member.

Looks like the "Windowsfied Linux" era is upon us.

[-] Dirk@lemmy.ml 5 points 10 months ago

That's the problem with "corporate Linux"[^1]. They see their users as customers only.

[^1]: Directly or indirectly owned by a for-profit organization of any type or directly or indirectly dependent on such an organization.

[-] ares35@kbin.social 8 points 10 months ago

do they also lock their sources behind a subscriber agreement that prohibits redistribution of source like ibm's redhat has done?

[-] Ganbat@lemmyonline.com 9 points 10 months ago

RHL: We're locking down our source because people are using it without contributing!

Also RHL: Thanks for your contribution, but we're not interested until we have someone ready to pay us for your labor.

[-] Cwilliams@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

Even if Ubuntu does start doing slightly sketchy things, they'll still be a million times better than Windows or MacOS

[-] ares35@kbin.social 5 points 10 months ago

canonical has already crossed that 'slightly sketchy' line.

[-] drwho@beehaw.org 2 points 10 months ago

And how many respins of Ubuntu are out there that just have their own repos? Quite a few, as I recall.

this post was submitted on 14 Nov 2023
132 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

47409 readers
741 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml
nooter692@lemmy.ml
MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml
cypherpunks@lemmy.ml
cyclohexane@lemmy.ml
d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz