527

To help contribute, here's the only meme I've ever done, which I did in response to news that Abrams was working on a new ST movie. And after seeing how well the franchise is going with SNW and LD, I feel it's even more appropriate.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

It was so insulting for him to come out and say he isn't a fan of the source material. Was it too much to ask to find someone who's passionate about Star Trek? I know they're out there.

[-] armus@startrek.website 45 points 1 year ago

Exactly! If he was not a fan of any of the 60 years of source material perhaps he should’ve stepped aside and let someone who cares about Star Trek contribute to it

[-] pancakes@sh.itjust.works 29 points 1 year ago

Imo, instead of asking why he didn't step aside, I think the fault is on the studio executives for wanting to go in that direction in the first place. They clearly wanted a different direction to classic Trek, otherwise JJ wouldn't have been their choice.

[-] BigBananaDealer@lemm.ee 19 points 1 year ago

the guy who directed rogue one and the andor tv series isnt much of a fan of star wars, and those are two of the most acclaimed star wars projects since disney bought star wars

[-] whofearsthenight@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

Although I do really like both of those and would probably put them at the top of the current generation of SW, they feel much less like SW properties and a lot more like they're wearing a SW skin. Which, you know, is fine since it's actually good and doesn't destroy the property. Even if you don't like Andor, they're still making a ton of just regular Star Wars shit.

JJ basically derailed Trek for those of us that actually like the type of thing Trek was doing for nearly a decade. Basically took until SNW to get an actual Trek show.

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Star Wars is samurai movies with a skin on it. The whole thing is borrowed, in space. So it’s okay to have stories like Andor, Rogue One and Mando, etc because they mesh well with the general design of the universe.

Lower Decks is as far as Star Trek as it can be, and yet it fits very well in the universe. Because it respects itself and respect the source material.

JJ never respected the source material and the universe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

It is, or at least was, a strangely popular thing n Hollywood for people working on franchises to claim they knew nothing about them. A kind of “too cool for all this” vanity they were trying to project.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Stamets@lemmy.world 49 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I don't mind the Kelvin movies too much. Actively enjoy them for the most part. But JJ was definitely the worst part of those movies by far and I completely agree with the meme. You can feel the love of everyone bleeding through despite him, not because of him. So many people worked on those movies who were huge fans of Trek and then he has the nerve to openly talk about how he isn't a fan of Star Trek.

Beyond is my favorite of the Kelvin movies and, what do you know, JJ didn't direct it. Funny that.

[-] FlatFootFox@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago

The man knows how to absolutely decimate a Starfleet vessel. I’m all for bringing him back if he’s just limited to 10 minutes of an unpowered ship tumbling in free fall towards a planet.

Strange New Worlds is much better modern Star Trek, but you can’t say JJ didn’t take advantage of the theatrical scale of things.

[-] Stamets@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Oh absolutely. Visually those movies are stunning. Like yeah, you can argue about plot and what not all you want but the shots of Into Darkness of the Vengeance sliding across San Francisco? Absolutely fucking amazing. And that shot of the Enterprise on a death spiral through the sky before the camera stops and you see the Enterprise slowly rise through the clouds? I have goosebumps thinking about it. I'm gonna need to rewatch that scene again.

Beyond has one of my favorite ship destruction sequences in all of Star Trek. Just the glory of the Enterprise cruising through space before having its throat unceremoniously slit was... Honestly it was a gut punch. Then seeing the saucer section bashing through mountains before crashing to a stop? FUCK! Not to mention the follow-up scene of reactivating the thrusters and causing the saucer to flip over.

Honestly the visuals are a huge reason as to why I enjoy the movie so much.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] porthos@startrek.website 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I didn't hate the Kelvin movies, aesthetically though they were trash in that they took a scifi franchise known for inspiring good UI design and expanded upon it with absolutely horrendous UI. Seriously the computers and interiors of those ships are so ugly it hurts.

Also, starfleet felt WAYYYYYYY too much like a military for me in those movies, there was no attempt to differentiate starfleet from a direct analog to the U.S. military and that just gives me that "kind of want to throw up" feeling every time I see it in star trek.

[-] Stamets@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

The part about the visuals of the ships is mostly opinion. I don't think they're that ugly.

I mean... there are a lot of differences that separate Starfleet from the US Military. That seems like a bit much. However the militaristic thing in general is completely explained in universe. It's not just a "Oh, Starfleet is more of a military now!" thing. The Kelvin was rocking along, doing it's typical stuff, and then suddenly a massive warship with unheard of weaponry shows up and proceeds to obliterate it, killing a massive amount of people and forcing over 800 other people to run for their lives. All in no time at all and within Federation borders. Prime Timeline Starfleet beefed up the military aspect after the Borg and only increased due to the Dominion. Makes a lot of sense to me that they'd step up the militaristic aspect in a universe where a random incursion within their own borders left them completely defenseless. Then 20ish years later, the fleet that was sitting at Earth and is responsible for Earths defense is completely wiped out in less than 10 minutes by that same ship. At that point it would be absolutely idiotic to not have Starfleet be more militaristic.

[-] SinningStromgald@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago

I love me some JJ Abrams hate. The man deserves it all and sooo much more.

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

What's annoying is that he's good at pacing and creating intrigue. He just never knows how stick the landing without turning the plot into swiss cheese.

[-] scytale@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He’s a great visual director, but he needs a good writer to keep him in check.

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago
[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Jorge is a fantastically creative guy. He needs limitations on that creativity, but he is undeniably a foundation of ideas.

JJ Abrams mostly regurgitates without having any truly unique ideas. Anything unique he does have is either a subversion or an unfinished mystery concept that’s film student tier. Especially in Star Wars and Trek, he took a bunch of the most surface level aspects from the franchises and threw them in without really doing anything with them.

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 year ago

His black box storytelling is garbage and the coincidence-based plot in that SW movie was unforgivable.

What's even funnier is when he tells how he came up with his "mystery box" method. He tries to play it off as some kind of profound insightful story from his childhood about magic shops. But then he explains it as the magic shops would package the junk that didn't sell into an unmarked "mystery box" to create intrigue which duped people into buying it. He outright admits he's selling junk

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Yeah. In that Jon Stewart interview he straight up says that he never liked Star Trek and that "Star Trek was always too philosophical for me."

He sucks so bad.

[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Not in that SW movie. In two of those SW movies.

Wait, is that what J. J. stands for?

[-] ahornsirup@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] semi_sentient@sh.itjust.works 14 points 1 year ago

Creating intrigue is relatively straightforward if you don’t worry about sticking the landing.

[-] morrowind@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

After seeing the rise of skywalker, I don't think I agree on the pacing bit.

[-] Hugin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Is he good at pacing? His movies are just go go go go without any room to breathe.

[-] sentient_loom@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 year ago

"Star Trek was too philosophical. So I fixed it." -JJ Abrams

[-] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 46 points 1 year ago

At least with Trek it was an alternate universe, rather than the canon he got his hands on with Wars.

Because of the nature of Trek, it was easy to retcon into an alternate universe. The world building in Star Wars didn't leave much room for that.

Maybe they can keep ignoring it for another decade, then write it off as a vision from the Dark Side.

[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Yeah, it's kinda funny how the supposedly more fantastical Star Wars has no really out there things like time travel or alternate universes.

It wasn't a retcon, though, it was conceived from the beginning as an alternate universe.

load more comments (2 replies)

...Somehow, Abrams has returned...

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] negativenull@lemm.ee 45 points 1 year ago
[-] samus12345@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Needs more lens flare:

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Underwaterbob@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago

I've hated him since Lost. Possibly even Alias. Stupid mystery box bullcrap, Yeah, some unresolved mystery is fine. Your entire show shouldn't revolve around boatloads of them being insufficiently explained.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] HotsauceHurricane@lemmy.one 15 points 1 year ago

I think if he had done ALL 3 sequel trilogy movies for starwars, it woukd have turned out much better.

[-] NoSpiritAnimal@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago

JJ Abrams can only begin narratives. He has no idea how to solve any of his own mystery boxes.

Look at anything he's ever done and you will probably not find a satisfying conclusion.

He can start a narrative better than most creators, he just has no idea what do to with it once it's running.

[-] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 16 points 1 year ago

Who knew throwing away your plans twice in a trilogy would backfire?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] stephfinitely@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

Eh I liked Star Trek 2009 and Force Awakens. I can get into how I dislike into darkness and episode 9 but not worth it.

[-] Riccosuave@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I also don't want Rian Johnson or Kathleen Kennedy anywhere near Star Wars or Star Trek anymore. Can we add them to the list as well.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 year ago

The films really weren't that bad

[-] hansl@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

They were very typical “J.J. Abram’s has no idea what a franchise is actually about”. He actually admitted not having seen any extra materials about the franchise before making the movies, and rehashed existing storylines because it’s safe.

JJ Abrams is loved by the studios for the very same reasons he’s dreaded by the fans.

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Yep. I liked them. Movie Trek has always been action anyways. He did some shit I really enjoyed honestly. Like Kirk being a rocker totally fucking fits.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

The validity of your comment really depends on which movie franchise you’re referencing

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] setsneedtofeed@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

I say give Zach Synder a wack at it.

[-] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I do need to see Picard snap Q's neck in cold blood.

Also it could be fun seeing Riker spend a whole film trying to kill Picard for no adequately explored reason.

Troi would be the saving grace of the film and end up with a separate stand-alone series of films that completely ignore all existing Trek canon.

The rest of the cast would also get solo movies, but ones forgotten either months after, or at worst, months before, their release dates.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
527 points (100.0% liked)

Risa

6943 readers
4 users here now

Star Trek memes and shitposts

Come on'n get your jamaharon on! There are no real rules—just don't break the weather control network.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS