305
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf to c/196

From: “Red Rosa: A Graphic Biography of Rosa Luxemburg” by Kate Evans.

all 29 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The hexbears won't like this one.

But I do! Good post, OP.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Believe it or not, but hexbear has a variety of leftist ideologies, including those friendly to the work of Rosa Luxemburg and Emma Goldman

Yet somehow only the smelliest turds float to the top...

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 8 points 1 year ago

There’s a great episode of Rev Left Radio with the author, highly recommend!

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 26 points 1 year ago

This is going to make a lot of people from instances that end in .ml very angry.

Prepare for the textwalls!

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Not seeing a lot of textwalls.

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

I think a large part of the reason why is these guys defederated the riff-raff pretty early on.

[-] Val@lemm.ee 25 points 1 year ago

What's annoying is that we probably would be a whole lot closer to actual communism and anarchism if the bolsheviks never took power and destroy all the communism that was happening during the Russian revolution.

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

Yup, and for a deep dive into the history of how this happened in both the USSR and Maoist China, I'd recommend Anark's series The State is Counterrevolutionary.

[-] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 2 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s):

The State is Counterrevolutionary

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source; check me out at GitHub.

[-] Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

MLs: "The only way to socialism is through violent, top-down revolution."

Syndicalists, getting every W known to man: "Are we a joke to you??"

[-] onion@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

What on earth is a top-down revolution? Wouldn't that just be a coup?

[-] Excrubulent@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 year ago

Yup, also called a bourgeois revolution.

[-] seliaste 1 points 1 year ago

The idea is to reverse the pyramid of power, so that the working class, which is usually at the bottom, becomes the top and the ruling class gets at the bottom. That way it would break any hierarchies

[-] ComradeSpood@lemmyunchained.net 21 points 1 year ago

Rosa Luxemburg was based as hell. And that's coming from an anarchist.

[-] rockSlayer@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

Dr. Wolff made a great video today about this very topic! It essentially boiled down to saying that a socialist revolution can only succeed if there is also a revolution in the workplace. Workers need to elect their managers, and have a strong union to coordinate production between industries.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 3 points 1 year ago

That was a really great episode, thanks for the shoutout! I usually only catch Economic Update on my local Leftist radio, but with that description I just had to seek it out, and I’m glad I did.

[-] Funkwonker@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A tankie will tell you to "read theory" and then get miffed if you read Rosa Luxemburg.

[-] BartsBigBugBag@lemmy.tf 1 points 1 year ago

Not in my experience, but we’re all entitled to our own experiences, so I can’t fault you for yours.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 10 points 1 year ago

"Those who would give up Liberty, to purchase a little temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety" -- Benjamin Franklin

[-] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago

Trading liberty for safety is the entire point of a society, you absolute dunce.

[-] GrapesOfAss@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Toxic child

[-] AdmiralShat@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

Imagine being this dense

[-] germanatlas 6 points 1 year ago

You heard it first from old Ben, stop saving money for retirement, you’re just giving up on your current liberty to have some temporary safety later in life.

[-] Frigid@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The irony that in this quote he was supporting the authority of government specifically on taxation for long term defense. "Temporary" was kind of the whole point.

[-] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

Which is precisely why it works in this context. He was talking about the Pennsylvania governor's ability to levy a new tax which some Englanders who ruled from afar were trying to bribe him to veto. His argument was that if people gave up their ability to govern themselves and let some faraway Leviathan do it in the hopes that said Leviathan would keep them safe, they deserved whatever was coming to them. I think this translates nicely onto "Socialism is not some Christmas gift for those who accept a dictator now in the hopes of achieving freedom in the future."

this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2023
305 points (100.0% liked)

196

16411 readers
1798 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS