599

Mike Johnson’s Wife Takes Down Website That Compared Being Gay To Bestiality, Incest (www.huffpost.com)

submitted 1 year ago by just_another_person@lemmy.world to c/politics@lemmy.world

46 comments fedilink hide all child comments

all 48 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] FoundTheVegan@kbin.social 141 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

disagreement with one’s biological sex, is sinful and offensive to God

"Intersex people don't exist. Stop making up words. If a baby has multiple sex charistics then OF COURSE surgical intervention is needed to force a binary choice. God doesn't make mistakes, but sometimes he does a whoopsie."

These people refuse to understand human biology because their goddamn Bible has already told them everything they want to know. Yet they have the gall to laughingly repeat "iT's bAsiC BiolOgY" without a clue to their ignorance.

[-] toasteecup@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure they haven't even read the Bible at this point.

[-] Drivebyhaiku@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago

Reading and comprehension are two different things. They have likely read the bible. If they believe in hell and quote Leviticus as though it represents Christian law then they have failed to comprend it.

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They had their stories preached to them by their pastor, they haven't read shit. 54% of American adults read below a 6th grade comprehension level. These people operate on their own fan fiction and head canon.

[-] ArtVandelay@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

Geez, that link is damning.

[-] killeronthecorner@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago

God doesn't make mistakes, but sometimes he does a whoopsie.

They think this sounds quippy like they're in a sitcom, whereas really they sound like an under-educated five year old

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 26 points 1 year ago

God doesn't shit, but sometimes he does a poo poo.

[-] CosmicTurtle@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

I want so badly what they mean by woopsie. Like....if God is capable of an woopsie, then he is not infallible.

So....is he God or not?

[-] LemmysMum@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

If God is infallible we'd all believe in him, ipso facto, he doesn't exist.

[-] NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can't tell if that intersex quote is real or not.

The crazy has become so normal i can't be sure.

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago

I actually doubt the Bible goes into gender identity. It’s all pure bigotry.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 39 points 1 year ago

It doesn't but Jesus does he's pretty clear he says

'be fuckin nice to people you shit heads"

i may be paraphrasing but that is what he's trying to get across

[-] moistclump@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

Jesus was based.

[-] deft@ttrpg.network 11 points 1 year ago

literally we gotta take him back tbh

dude was a highly sarcastic political activist who was mocking the roman emperor and got killed for it.

when he said drink my blood, eat my flesh. dude was tongue in cheek mocking the cults at the time being so dramatic and also embracing this identity that Jewish people are evil and use curses and blood magic shit.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

His mom was next level. Gets drunk, fucks around, gets pregnant. She tells people that the kid is actually the son of a god and people eat that shit right up. Joseph though.. That poor guy had to be in some serious denial. That dude was probably like Charlie from Me, Myself & Irene.

[-] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

I don't remember it being prominent but there are a shitload of bizarre rules.

[-] remotelove@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

“If your right hand causes you to sin, cut it off and throw it away.”

If masturbation is a sin, there should be a fuck ton of one handed christians out there.... Just sayin'.

[-] uphillbothways@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago

If they are going to believe in a god but then deny, abuse and destroy nature, which could only be thought of as their god's expression in physical form, doesn't that make these people blasphemous heretics by their own definition? Unfortunately, these "religious" fucks are just liars who in reality think they know better than whatever god they act like they believe in. They'll abuse and destroy anything in their path because to them noone and nothing has actual value. The only important thing to them is their own imagined version of the divine.

[-] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

People seem to think religious people do things because their religion demands them. That is not how this works.

Their id demands it. Their ego demands it. Then in the cold light of morning. They had to do it. For God.

[-] AlphaOmega@lemmy.world 71 points 1 year ago

The Internet never forgets.

https://web.archive.org/web/20230330184244/https://www.onwardchristiancounseling.org/

[-] buddhabound@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago

This is how you funnel money to people in government positions. Their spouses give "talks" across a "wide variety of timely topics" for money.

[-] SwingingTheLamp@midwest.social 38 points 1 year ago

TL;DR; I'll just fill in the punchline from all of the previous, similar news articles: Mike Johnson and his wife are self-loathing sexual deviants. Got it.

[-] eran_morad@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago

Bet you this guy gets caught in a wide stance at some point.

[-] charliespider@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

Like simultaneously pro-life AND pro-NRA?

😉

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago

"Wide Stance" is a reference to the long-time R senator from Idaho who was busted by a detective at the Minneapolis airport while apparently looking to have anonymous gay sex in a restroom. It seems the way guys would signal their interest to each other was by playing footsie between the stalls, and Craig's excuse was he is a 'wide guy' which somehow turned into 'wide stance'.

Also, check out the recipe he submitted to the Congress Cooks! cook book (which was really hilariously horrible, btw, it's gone now but used to be on a site called virtualcities):
https://dinnerisserved1972.com/2012/10/03/wiener-wednesday-super-tuber/

The Super Tuber. Most homoerotic entree I have ever imagined... you are supposed to take a potato, cut a hole through it, grease it up, then shove a hot dog through the middle.

[-] morphballganon@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

The show Boston Legal has a bit about this. William Shatner's character is trying to take a dump and gets accused of soliciting gay sex. This is also the episode where his phone makes the Star Trek communicator whistle.

[-] Dkarma@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

No like "just asking for some tp" under a stall divider.

[-] erranto@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Heads don't fall that easily.

[-] Overzeetop@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago

If you're going to be homo- or transphobic (por qué no los dos?) I way you need to own that shit. This conservative whitewashing of their closely held beliefs when the light suddenly shines on them is doubly disgusting.

[-] just_another_person@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I believe that's part of the Republican mantra though. Say a bunch of awful things, then immediately deny that you said it. To what effect, I have no clue.

[-] LillyPip@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago

They’re testing the fences. This is how fascism creeps in mostly under the radar.

They say something egregious and gauge the response. If it gets too much backlash, they dial it back a bit, but each outrageous move normalises fascism a bit more until people are unknowingly accepting things that would have been unthinkable a few years before.

By the time people notice, discourse is so broken it’s nearly impossible to go back without seismic (and often deadly) social change.

[-] AlwaysNowNeverNotMe@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Idiots with either opinion will flock to you to be contrarians.

[-] squiblet@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

They made the point to the people they wanted to (could it be one of their favorite accusations ....virtue signaling?) and then claim they removed it because they're being persecuted by WOKEys and the Bad Liberal Media.

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Somebody's hiding their light under a bushel!

[-] billiam0202@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Oh no!

[-] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Where do you buy these nonflammable bushels

[-] eestileib@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Right next to the bushes that burn but are not consumed; aisle 35B, third shelf.

[-] charonn0@startrek.website 13 points 1 year ago

If she actually believed her own bullshit then she would be GLAD that she has a more prominent platform from which to spread her beliefs.

[-] lingh0e@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 year ago

Seriously. Deeply held religions convictions my ass.

[-] andrew_bidlaw@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

Christians are animals lmao.

[-] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 8 points 1 year ago

Next up: Conservatives call Mike Johnson a groomer for his wife taking down site comparing homosexuality to bestiality, incest

[-] _number8_@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

well at least she took it down

edit: i was being ineffably sarcastic

[-] Perfide@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

This is arguably a bad thing. The damage her shitty website could do is nothing compared to the damage that her husband can do if they're successful in whitewashing his history. They haven't stopped believing these things, they just don't want the public to know they believe these things.

[-] maniclucky@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Oh Poe's Law...

[-] MagicShel@programming.dev 3 points 1 year ago

Why does this guy look like someone asked an AI to create a real life Alfred E. Neuman with glasses? It's uncanny.

https://images.app.goo.gl/5xnhDRg5XbjQ3n5L8

[-] Jaysyn@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Log Cabin Republican approved!

this post was submitted on 31 Oct 2023

599 points (100.0% liked)

politics

19126 readers

1946 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

• Register To Vote

• Citizenship Resource Center

• Congressional Awards Program

• Federal Government Agencies

• Library of Congress Legislative Resources

• The White House

• U.S. House of Representatives

• U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

• News