42
submitted 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) by Wurzl@lemmy.zip to c/politics@lemmy.world
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 21 points 1 hour ago

There's a non-zero chance that Jeffries doesn't understand how bad this looks and was just thinking that going to it might make republicans more pliable.

There's a much larger chance that he a fucking collaborator.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 20 points 1 hour ago

There’s a much larger chance that he a fucking collaborator.

He's not interested in the ascendant DSA wing of the party. He's said that as much.

People like Jefferies see the parties as theirs not a thing of the peoples.

[-] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago

Even without the DSA... he's still trying to work with fucking nazis. He's a collaborator. With. Nazis.

it's entirely possible he was trying to get whatever he could out of kushner, but, that's very unlikely.

[-] TropicalDingdong@lemmy.world 4 points 58 minutes ago

Well who else is he going to work with? The voters hate him. Democrats, as a party, will happily disenfranchise their own voters, and cede ruling to the other party, so long as they get to stay in place as managers. Its the one consistent thing about Democrats. They care less about winning elections than they doing maintaining personal control of the party.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 40 minutes ago

There's a much larger chance that he a fucking collaborator.

He was chosen by Nancy Pelosi to be her replacement for a reason

[-] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 2 points 16 minutes ago

These are some of the biggest Zionist pieces of shit in office on either party.

Whatever they met about, it was definitely to push Israel's agenda. My worry is they're specifically working to get enough votes for the senate to agree to merge the military with Israel's using Jefferies's influence in the DNC.

this post was submitted on 23 Aug 2026
42 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30893 readers
1684 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS