131
submitted 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) by GlacialTurtle@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml

For years now, executives at companies that are pouring hundreds of billions of dollars a year into developing various artificial intelligence tools have insisted that the technology will ultimately mean people will spend less of their time working.

An engineering director at Google said four years ago that AI would deliver a four-day work week by 2025.

Earlier this year, and just one year after that engineering director's prediction, OpenAI took up the challenge, in a manner of speaking. It formally urged companies to start testing out a four-day work week (with no change in pay), claiming that AI will soon be able to speed up so much human labour that the corporate world should prepare itself.

However, a former OpenAI technical employee who left the company last year told the BBC the firm never actually trialled the four-day work week it suggested others should try while they were there.

Instead, the person described what was often a gruelling work culture marked by frequent "crisis meetings", working on weekends, and "super cut-throat" performance reviews that would see colleagues suddenly let go.

"You go in on Saturday or Sunday just to catch up or make sure things aren't broken," the person said.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 2 hours ago

Tech ~~leaders~~ bros

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 9 points 13 hours ago

Increased productivity from better tooling has never equated to less working time. Increased productivity from better tooling always results in more working time, because now you can "produce more". The only exception is farm stuff for small producers. The big land owners can now use more land thanks to better tools.

[-] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 11 points 16 hours ago

As with all inventions, the 40 hour workweek lie remains while 60+ hour weeks continue. I do more work, get paid the same, and am expected to work even harder. The machine must grow

[-] Snapz@lemmy.world 32 points 22 hours ago

Know this without ambiguity, it will never be enough for them. The point is to always push you to broken and then replace you without remorse.

[-] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago

it'll never be enough because they're only focused on themselves, like both red and blue magas do.

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 20 points 21 hours ago

It is not the normal maintenance of the labour-power which is to determine the limits of the working-day; it is the greatest possible daily expenditure of labour-power, no matter how diseased, compulsory, and painful it may be, which is to determine the limits of the labourers’ period of repose. Capital cares nothing for the length of life of labour-power. All that concerns it is simply and solely the maximum of labour-power, that can be rendered fluent in a working-day.

Kar Marx, Capital, vol 1, chapter 10, section 5

[-] muhyb@programming.dev 22 points 21 hours ago

Haha, that's not how it works. One of my teachers used to say "Computers made our jobs easy but then they started to give more work to us."

[-] FluidBeef@quokk.au 6 points 18 hours ago

It takes a lot of man hours to achieve the AI productivity boost the CEO told us we’re getting.

[-] illi@sh.itjust.works 10 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Oh they meant less work for them. Not for us peons, that would be silly.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 13 hours ago

How do you get less work from zero work? Does it underflow and rolls back to maximum work?

[-] PeroBasta@lemmy.world 2 points 11 hours ago

No, they sabotage other's work. Which many top manager already do

[-] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Anyone who isn't clearly working 2 physical jobs claiming to do 90h is a liar 99.9+% of the time.

This is also 2 discreet issues. I'm tired of this propaganda boss.

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 2 points 18 hours ago

In my current project Copilot saved extreme amounts of work for knowledge transfer session planning and creating documentation, technical role description, interview questions for staffing, RAID notices, drafting complex emails, and so on.

[-] SmokeInFog@midwest.social 5 points 15 hours ago

And did you get to go home early because of the saved time?

[-] eleitl@lemmy.zip 1 points 10 hours ago

I work in home office, so I enjoyed the couch a lot.

[-] thanksforreading@lemmy.ml 3 points 22 hours ago

I don't believe for one second that tech leaders have never heard of the lump of labour fallacy

this post was submitted on 10 Aug 2026
131 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

43062 readers
306 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS