143
Fucking nerds, man. Why can't we learn to work together!?
Probably autism for a solid portion of them. Some form of neurodivergence for nearly all of them.
Forking this comment because it didn't include a reference to me.
Oh gosh, the bickering.
I'm not sure I like your attitude, so I'm starting my own thread down below and everyone else is welcome to join me there.
๐๐
A core feature of any mature FOSS project.
Bonkers that its the default on many distros instead of qbittorrent
it's qbittorrent, not gbittorrent. that's really why.
transmission has been the default on so many gnome-based distributions for a very long time because of its gtk frontend.. it also has a qt frontend, curses cli, daemon, windows qt build, and native mac versions...
qbittorrent also runs on more than just linux, but is qt. only qt. how many qt-only applications find their way into the default package set for gnome or gtk desktops released by debian, ubuntu, mint, fedora, redhat, suse, etc, etc.
Yeah, I much prefer cli front ends over web ones as all my torrent boxes have been headless. I realize with most client server archs I could connect via gui but still I prefer cli.
It does what it used to do 15 years ago and it does it well. The arr-stack tried to make me use qBittorrent. I said no and did it with Transmission anyway.
Qbt likewise has been doing it for 20 years and doing it well ๐คท
Works great in my friends arr stack
Why does anyone use this over qbit?
Tried both, qBittorrent is much heavier on the CPU just sitting there idling. I do have a large amount of torrents, maybe over 200, and I didn't expect to notice such a difference.
It's lightweight, open source, and does exactly what it's supposed to.
I kind of legacyed my way into it. It was the first thing I grabbed after uTorrent went to hell decades ago.
What is the advantage of qbit over it?
I2p torrenting is supported by QBitTorrent not transmission. Transmission is simple, clean, lightweight and does the thing. QB is a million knobs dials and levers and comparatively heavier though not offensively so.
Qbittorrent feels a lot closer to what uTorrent used to be, while Transmission has more of a Mac-style simplicity to it.
My main point of concern is most of my indexes often ban versions of transmission but I never see that for qbit.
It works great headless on my server. It does what it is supposed to do without any bloat that I would not use anyway.
That is pretty good.
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
143 points (100.0% liked)
Linux
18635 readers
101 users here now
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS